NewKerala.com

Key Points

The Supreme Court has intervened in a contentious film release dispute between Kamal Haasan and Karnataka authorities. A writ petition challenges the state's alleged "extra-judicial ban" on screening 'Thug Life' following controversial remarks about Kannada language origins. The case highlights complex tensions between artistic expression and regional sentiments. The SC has issued notices to Karnataka's top officials and scheduled further hearings to examine the constitutional implications of the film's suppression.

Key Points: Supreme Court Challenges Karnataka's Ban on Kamal Haasan Film

  • SC seeks responses from Karnataka government over film screening ban
  • Petition claims unconstitutional restriction on free speech
  • Controversy stems from Haasan's linguistic origin comments
  • Threats of theatre arson complicate film's release
2 min read

SC issues notice to Karnataka for 'ban' on screening Kamal Haasan-starrer 'Thug Life'

SC issues notice challenging Karnataka's ban on 'Thug Life', examining free speech and linguistic tensions in film release controversy

"Kannada is born out of Tamil - Kamal Haasan"

New Delhi, June 13

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice on a plea challenging Karnataka’s "extra-judicial ban" on the screening of ‘Thug Life’ -- a film by veteran filmmaker Mani Ratnam and superstar Kamal Haasan.

A bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan sought responses of Karnataka’s Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary (Home) and Director General of Police in the matter and posted the petition for further hearing on Tuesday (June 17).

During the film’s audio launch, Kamal Haasan claimed that “Kannada is born out of Tamil”, sparking strong reactions in Karnataka.

The writ petition filed by Bengaluru's M. Mahesh Reddy claimed that despite certification by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), the Karnataka government has prevented Thug Life’s theatrical release through oral instructions and police interference.

Advocate A. Velan, representing the petitioner, contended that such actions amounted to an unconstitutional restriction on free speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

The Karnataka government has completely "capitulated" to extremist elements, who were attacking linguistic minorities and calling for the burning of theatres, submitted Velan.

As per the petition, the ban stems from a deliberate campaign of terror, including explicit threats of arson against cinema halls, incitement to large-scale communal violence targeting linguistic minorities, and a chilling call for a repeat of past anti-Tamil riots.

“This reign of intimidation is a direct, flagrant violation of the Fundamental Rights to Freedom of Speech and Expression (Article 19(1)(a)) and to Practice any Profession (Article 19(1)(g)). More seriously, it is a calculated attack on the secular fabric and public order of the State,” stated the petition.

Following the row over Haasan’s remarks on the origins of the Kannada language, the film's producer, Raaj Kamal Films International, had petitioned the Karnataka High Court seeking protection. However, the Karnataka HC suggested that Kamal Haasan issue an apology, but the actor-politician has refused to do so. As a result of the actor's refusal to issue an outright apology, the film’s release in Karnataka has been postponed indefinitely.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajesh K.
This is ridiculous! A state government banning a certified film because of political pressure sets a dangerous precedent. What next - banning books, music? Karnataka should respect constitutional rights. Kamal Haasan's comments may be controversial, but banning art isn't the solution.
P
Priya M.
As a Kannadiga, I'm disappointed by both sides. Kamal sir should have been more careful with his words about language origins, but banning the film is too much. Let people watch and decide! 🤦‍♀️ This political drama is taking attention away from the actual movie which looks amazing.
S
Suresh V.
Good that SC has taken notice. No state should have veto power over CBFC decisions. But I wish Kamal Haasan had shown some statesmanship - a simple clarification could have cooled tempers. Now innocent theatre owners are suffering because of this ego clash.
A
Ananya T.
Why are we still fighting over language origins in 2024? All Indian languages are beautiful and have rich histories. The government should focus on protecting theatres from vandalism instead of banning films. This isn't the India I want for my children 😔
K
Karthik N.
I support creative freedom but artists must also be responsible. When you're a public figure speaking about sensitive issues, words matter. That said, the ban is wrong - two wrongs don't make a right. Hope SC resolves this quickly!
M
Meena R.
This controversy is saddening. As someone who loves both Tamil and Kannada cinema, I just want to enjoy good films without politics. Mani Ratnam's movies always have great messages about unity - ironic that this is happening to his film! 😅

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50