NewKerala.com

Pakistan Docked WTC Points for Slow Over-Rate in 1st Test

Pakistan have been penalized eight points in the ICC World Test Championship 2025-27 cycle for a slow over-rate in the first Test against Bangladesh. The team was also fined 40% of their match fee after being found eight overs short of the required rate. Skipper Shan Masood accepted the charge, avoiding a formal hearing. Following the penalty, Pakistan sit eighth in the WTC standings with a points percentage of 11.110.

Key Points: Pakistan Penalized 8 WTC Points for Slow Over-Rate

  • Pakistan docked 8 WTC points for slow over-rate
  • Fined 40% of match fee for being 8 overs short
  • Shan Masood accepted the penalty without formal hearing
  • Pakistan now 8th in WTC standings with 11.110 PCT
  • Bangladesh won 1st Test by 104 runs
2 min read

Pakistan docked WTC points for slow over-rate in 1st Test of Pakistan series

Pakistan lose 8 WTC points and fined 40% match fee for slow over-rate in 1st Test vs Bangladesh. Shan Masood accepts penalty.

"Pakistan skipper Shan Masood accepted the offence and the proposed punishment - ICC"

New Delhi, May 15

Pakistan have been docked eight points in the ongoing ICC World Test Championship 2025-27 cycle and fined 40 per cent of their match fee after being found eight overs short of the required rate once time allowances were considered, in the first Test of the two-match series against Bangladesh, according to the ICC website.

The penalty was handed down by Jeff Crowe of the ICC Elite Panel of Match Referees.

According to Article 2.22 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to minimum over-rate violations, players are fined five per cent of their match fee for every over their team fails to complete in the stipulated time.

In addition, Article 16.11.2 of the World Test Championship playing conditions states that a team loses one championship point for each over short, which resulted in Pakistan being penalised eight points in the WTC standings.

Pakistan skipper Shan Masood accepted the offence and the proposed punishment, meaning there was no requirement for a formal hearing. The charge was brought forward by on-field umpires Richard Kettleborough and Kumar Dharmasena, along with third umpire Allahuddien Palekar and fourth umpire Gazi Sohel.

Following the penalty, Pakistan now have four points in the WTC standings and sit eighth on the points table with the Points Percentage (PCT) of 11.110, just ahead of the West Indies.

Coming to the first Test, Bangladesh secured the match with a remarkable bowling performance on the final day, clinching a 104-run victory courtesy of Nahid Rana's outstanding five-wicket haul.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

M
Michael C
As a cricket fan, this is frustrating to see. The WTC points system is already confusing enough, and now Pakistan lose 8 points for over-rate violations? The rules are clear though - teams need to bowl their overs in time. Pakistan have only themselves to blame. Nahid Rana is a gem for Bangladesh though!
P
Priya S
Honestly, India-Pakistan cricket rivalry aside, this kind of penalty hurts Test cricket. Pakistan were already struggling in the WTC, and now they're almost out of contention. The real story here is Bangladesh's rise - they're playing proper Test cricket now. Well done to Nahid Rana and co. 🇧🇩
V
Vikram M
I've been saying this for years - ICC needs to be stricter with over-rates. These points deductions are good, but they should also look at on-field umpires being more proactive. Pakistan were 8 overs short? That's nearly an hour of lost play. Shan Masood accepting the punishment was the right move, but team management needs to fix this.
S
Sarah B
It's almost poetic that Pakistan lose points for slow over-rate when their own team is slow in everything these days - batting, bowling, and now fielding! All jokes aside, this is a big wake-up call for them. Bangladesh are no longer minnows - they're consistently beating teams and playing smart cricket. Respect where it's due.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50