Key Points

BJP MP Sanjay Jaiswal has strongly rebutted allegations made by Prashant Kishor regarding diesel theft and infrastructure project manipulation. He presented RTI documents from Indian Railways and NHAI to counter the claims, challenging the investigation's competence. Jaiswal warned of a massive Rs 132.24 crore defamation suit if Kishor does not issue a public apology. The controversy highlights the ongoing political tensions between the two prominent political figures in Bihar.

Key Points: Sanjay Jaiswal Warns Prashant Kishor of Rs 132 Crore Defamation Suit

  • BJP MP counters Kishor's diesel theft allegations with official RTI documents
  • Jaiswal reveals criminal case already filed against Prashant Kishor
  • Urban Development Department inquiry questioned for technical errors
  • Defamation suit of Rs 132.24 crore threatened if no public apology
2 min read

Sanjay Jaiswal threatens Rs 132.24 crore defamation suit against Prashant Kishor

BJP MP Sanjay Jaiswal challenges Prashant Kishor's allegations with RTI documents, threatens massive legal action over diesel theft claims

"If he does not apologise publicly for his baseless allegations, I will proceed with a defamation suit - Dr. Sanjay Jaiswal"

Patna, Sep 29

BJP MP from Bihar's West Champaran, Dr Sanjay Jaiswal, on Monday strongly rebutted the allegations of diesel theft and changes in the alignment of the Cantonment Overbridge levelled by Jan Suraj Party founder Prashant Kishor, warning of a Rs 132.24 crore defamation suit if he does not issue a public apology.

Addressing the media in Bettiah, Jaiswal presented Right to Information (RTI) reports obtained from the Indian Railways and National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to counter the charges.

"Both departments have clearly stated that the alignment of the Cantonment Overbridge has not been altered and no changes have been made to the design of the National Highway," he said.

On the allegation of diesel theft, Jaiswal said Kishor based his claim on a letter written by Municipal Corporation Mayor Garima Devi Sikaria, despite admitting in his own response that the petrol pump in question does not belong to Jaiswal.

To probe the matter, the Urban Development Department had ordered an eight-point investigation in Patna. The inquiry examined the petrol pump's records and cited the absence of GST on diesel bills for 15 vehicles.

Countering this, Jaiswal pointed out that petrol and diesel are not subject to GST anywhere in India, questioning the competence of the investigating officer.

"How could the official raise such a point when GST does not apply to fuel? This shows the report was part of a conspiracy and needs an independent investigation," he asserted.

The MP further revealed that a criminal case has already been filed against Prashant Kishor in court.

"If he does not apologise publicly for his baseless allegations, I will proceed with a defamation suit of Rs 132.24 crore," Jaiswal warned.

The controversy erupted after Kishor accused Jaiswal of involvement in diesel theft and alleged manipulation of the Cantonment Overbridge project in West Champaran -- claims that the MP has now dismissed as politically motivated.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The GST point is crucial - how can an investigating officer not know that diesel doesn't attract GST? This shows the inquiry was biased from the beginning. Hope truth prevails in this case.
A
Arjun K
₹132 crore defamation suit seems excessive though. While false allegations are wrong, such huge amounts might discourage legitimate criticism of public figures. The amount should be reasonable.
S
Sarah B
As someone who follows Bihar politics closely, this looks like another political drama before elections. Both sides should focus on development work rather than trading allegations.
V
Vikram M
The fact that Kishor admitted the petrol pump doesn't belong to Jaiswal but still made allegations shows poor research. Public figures should be more responsible with their statements.
M
Michael C
Interesting to see RTI being used effectively here. This is how transparency should work in our democracy - using official documents to counter false narratives. 👍

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50