Sabarimala Gold Heist: How a Temple Scandal Threatens Kerala's Ruling Party

The Sabarimala gold heist investigation is intensifying as the SIT prepares to question more individuals. Former Devaswom Board president Padmakumar's testimony suggests collective responsibility among officials. The CPI(M) is cautiously watching the probe, delaying disciplinary action against Padmakumar. With local elections approaching, the political fallout could significantly impact the ruling party.

Key Points: Sabarimala Gold Heist SIT Probe CPI(M) Political Fallout

  • SIT seizes crucial documents during 12-hour search at Padmakumar's residence
  • Actor Jayaram to be questioned as witness in Chennai ritual case
  • CPI(M) delays disciplinary action fearing senior leader implications
  • Investigation examines misleading "copper sheets" entry in official minutes
3 min read

Sabarimala gold heist: SIT treads cautiously as CPI(M) watches closely

Kerala SIT expands Sabarimala gold heist probe amid political tensions. CPI(M) delays action as ex-legislator Padmakumar's testimony implicates senior leaders before elections.

"The controversial decision was inserted into the board's minutes without their consent - Former board members"

Thiruvananthapuram, Nov 22

The Sabarimala gold heist controversy has intensified, with the Kerala High Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) preparing to question more individuals based on the statement of arrested former Devaswom Board president and ex-CPI(M) legislator A. Padmakumar.

Padmakumar has alleged that prime accused Unnikrishnan Potti -- who is accused of conducting rituals using the gold-plated temple door panels -- had approached former Devaswom Minister Kadakampally Surendran and others seeking sponsorship.

During a 12-hour search at Padmakumar’s Aranmula residence, investigators seized crucial documents that the SIT believes will play a significant role in the probe.

Actor Jayaram, who took part in a ritual in Chennai involving the gold-plated panels, will be questioned as a witness. Jayaram has maintained that he attended the event solely as an Ayyappa devotee, did not pay or receive any money, and clarified that the puja took place at a company facility in Ambattur -- not at his home. Singer Veeramani Raju, who performed at the ceremony, will also have his statement recorded.

Padmakumar’s testimony reportedly suggests that the decision to hand over the dismantled sanctum door panels to Potti was not taken by him alone, hinting at collective responsibility among Devaswom Board officials. Former board members K.P. Sankaradas (CPI) and N. Vijayakumar (CPI-M) have claimed innocence, alleging that the controversial decision was inserted into the board’s minutes without their consent.

Meanwhile, the CPI(M) has decided not to take disciplinary action against Padmakumar at this stage, wary that he may implicate senior leaders. The party leadership -- reportedly acting on Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan’s advice -- has chosen to wait for the SIT’s final report before moving forward.

With local body elections scheduled for December 9 and 11, the ruling party is concerned about the political fallout, especially as both the Congress and BJP have turned the gold heist into a major campaign issue. Padmakumar remains influential at the grassroots, making the situation more delicate for the CPI(M).

The SIT is also likely to summon more former Devaswom officials, including ex-administrative officer Rajendran. Investigators are examining key evidence indicating that Padmakumar personally wrote in the official minutes to transfer the temple panels -- described misleadingly as “copper sheets” -- to Potti.

Currently in judicial custody, Padmakumar is expected to be taken back into SIT custody for further interrogation, a move that could widen the probe to include higher-level political and administrative figures. The coming days will be crucial for Surendran and the CPI(M) as the investigation tightens its focus amidst an election-charged atmosphere.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Typical political drama before elections! CPI(M) protecting their own while pretending to be clean. Why wait for SIT report to take action? If Padmakumar is guilty, he should be expelled immediately. Sabarimala is above politics!
A
Arjun K
As a devotee who visits Sabarimala every year, this news makes me very angry. Temple properties should be handled with utmost care and transparency. Calling gold-plated panels as "copper sheets" shows deliberate deception. Shameful!
S
Sarah B
I appreciate that the investigation is being thorough, but I hope they don't drag innocent people like Jayaram unnecessarily. Many celebrities attend religious events as devotees. Let's not mix devotion with criminal investigation.
K
Karthik V
This case shows why we need complete transparency in temple administration. Devaswom Boards should have public audits and live streaming of important decisions. Swamiye Saranam Ayyappa! 🙏
M
Michael C
While the investigation is important, I hope it doesn't become a political tool for opposition parties. Let the SIT do its work without pressure from any side. The truth should prevail, regardless of political consequences.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50