NewKerala.com

Key Points

Rahul Gandhi has stirred a political storm by criticizing India's Election Commission during his US visit. Senior BJP leaders, including Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and Union Minister Prahlad Joshi, have strongly condemned his remarks as anti-national and disrespectful. Gandhi claims the Election Commission is compromised, particularly referencing the Maharashtra Assembly elections. The controversy highlights the ongoing tension between the Congress and BJP, with accusations of undermining democratic institutions.

Key Points: Rahul Gandhi Attacks EC in US Amid BJP Criticism

  • Rahul Gandhi alleges Election Commission compromise during US trip
  • BJP leaders call his remarks anti-national and disgraceful
  • Gandhi claims voter turnout irregularities in Maharashtra elections
  • Criticism comes amid ongoing political tensions
2 min read

Rahul Gandhi faces criticism for 'attacking' EC in US

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi faces strong backlash for criticizing India's Election Commission during US visit, with BJP leaders condemning his remarks.

"His actions reflect the frustration of repeatedly losing elections - Devendra Fadnavis, Maharashtra CM"

Boston, April 21

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's attacks on India's election system came under harsh criticism on Monday.

Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said that Gandhi's repeated attempts to malign India's democracy and spread false statements on foreign land deserve strong condemnation.

"His actions reflect the frustration of repeatedly losing elections", he said in a post X while reacting to Gandhi's remarks in Boston against the Election Commission.

Gandhi, whose party was soundly rejected by voters in last year's Maharashtra election, winning just 16 seats, said, "It is very clear to us that the Election Commission is compromised, and it is very clear that there is something wrong with the system."

The BJP posted on X, "Every foreign trip of Rahul Gandhi follows the same script: land, defame India, question democracy, return. His tours have become nothing more than anti-India events."

Repeating his party's alibi for its defeat, Gandhi claimed, "More people voted in the Maharashtra Assembly elections than there are adults in Maharashtra."

He asserted that the high voter turnout was impossible and that the Election Commission refused to share videos or information with his party.

Union Minister Prahlad Joshi said on X, "Such repeated attacks clearly reflect his deep-rooted anti-India mindset. No responsible leader maligns their own country on global platforms. Rahul Gandhi's obsession with criticising India overseas is disgraceful. He owes an apology to the nation."

Gandhi's criticism of the Indian election system is selective. The Election Commission has demonstrated its credibility with the victory of the Congress Party in Karnataka, where Gandhi's party formed the government.

Gandhi did not criticise the election machinery in Karnataka or in Haryana, even though the Congress lost that state, but less drastically than in Maharashtra.

He arrived in Boston on Saturday and met with supporters and the Overseas Indian Congress on Sunday.

He is scheduled to speak at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, at an event billed as 'Conversation with Rahul Gandhi' at the Saxena Centre for Contemporary South Asia.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
It's disappointing to see a leader constantly criticizing our institutions abroad. If there are issues, they should be addressed through proper channels in India. This just gives ammunition to those who want to portray India negatively. 🇮🇳
R
Rahul S.
While I don't always agree with Rahul Gandhi, he does raise valid concerns about election transparency. The EC should be more open with data to maintain public trust. Criticism ≠ anti-national.
A
Anjali M.
The timing of these comments is interesting - right before elections in Karnataka. Feels more like political strategy than genuine concern. 🤔
S
Sanjay P.
If voter turnout was really higher than eligible voters, that would be serious! But where's the evidence? Just making claims without proof hurts his credibility.
M
Meena R.
I attended his talk at Brown. The context is being misrepresented - he was answering a question about democratic backsliding globally. His full remarks were more nuanced than these soundbites suggest.
V
Vikram J.
The selective criticism angle is valid. If EC was truly compromised, Congress wouldn't have won Karnataka. Leaders should be consistent in their principles, not just when it suits them.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50