Key Points

The Supreme Court is set to hear a critical Public Interest Litigation addressing tourist safety in remote areas following the tragic Pahalgam terror attack. The PIL highlights the urgent need for comprehensive security guidelines and protection strategies for travelers in vulnerable regions. Justice Surya Kant's bench will examine the petition's demands for enhanced security measures and immediate help protocols during potential terrorist incidents. The case underscores the growing concern about protecting civilians in geographically challenging and high-risk tourist destinations.

Key Points: SC Hearing Pahalgam Attack PIL for Tourist Safety in J&K

  • SC to hear PIL on tourist security in hilly regions
  • Pahalgam attack highlighted vulnerability of travelers
  • Petition seeks comprehensive safety guidelines
  • Government urged to enhance protection in remote areas
3 min read

Pahalgam attack: SC to hear on Monday PIL seeking more security for tourists in hilly and remote areas

Supreme Court to address critical security concerns for tourists in remote areas following deadly Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians

"Recent terrorist attacks have raised questions of the security of tourists visiting such remote places - PIL Petition"

New Delhi, May 4

The Supreme Court is slated to hear, on Monday, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking enhanced safety and security measures for tourists in hilly areas and remote destinations, filed in the aftermath of the deadly April 22 terror attack in Jammu & Kashmir's (J&K) Pahalgam, which claimed lives of 26 civilians, including 25 tourists and a local.

As per the causelist published on the website of the apex court, a bench of Justices Surya Kant and N.K. Singh will hear the matter on May 5.

The petition said that there exists a lack of safety programmes and guidelines for tourists and the general public on how to save themselves when there is a terrorist attack, how to get immediate help, and how to hide themselves when attacked.

It added that tourists in Pahalgam were an easy target for the terrorists as those innocent people were unarmed and without any security.

"It is for the first time that the tourists have been targeted and in such large numbers they have been killed and injured. Now it has raised the question of safety and security of the people of the country who visit as tourists, mostly in hilly areas and valleys like Jammu and Kashmir," the plea said.

"Recent terrorist attacks have raised questions of the security of tourists visiting such remote places. In urban areas, it is difficult to attack as there is regular movement of police force,s but tourist destinations are geographically different where people can be targeted easily," it added.

The PIL stressed that the Centre and State governments will have to take steps to deploy adequate security for the tourists who visit remote hilly areas and valleys, especially during the summer season.

"The VIPs always remain under protection throughout the clock in our country. When they pass, roads are blocked for citizens. A lot of security personnel are deployed in their security, but the common people always suffer," it further said.

The top court, on Thursday, declined to entertain a plea seeking the formation of a probe panel headed by a retired apex court judge to investigate the deadly Pahalgam attack.

Slamming the PIL litigant, the Justice Surya Kant-led Bench said that it would not entertain any plea which could demoralise the country's armed forces.

"Be responsible before filing such a PIL. Since when have retired High Court or Supreme Court judges become experts in investigation? Since when have we (judges) gained the expertise of investigation? We only decide disputes. Please do not ask for these prayers (for investigation under supervision of a retired SC judge)," the apex court said.

"This is the crucial hour when each and every citizen of the country has joined hands to fight terrorism. Don't make any prayers which could demoralise our forces. It is not acceptable to us! Look at the sensitivity of the issue," it added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rajiv K.
This PIL is much needed! Our beautiful Kashmir valley deserves better security for tourists. Terrorism has no place in Bharat. But we must also trust our armed forces - they're doing their best in difficult terrain. More CCTV cameras and tourist police booths could help. 🇮🇳
P
Priya M.
Heartbreaking incident. My family had visited Pahalgam last year - it's such a peaceful place. The government should create tourist safety apps with SOS features and emergency contacts. Also need better coordination between local police and CRPF in these areas.
A
Amit S.
While security is important, we must not turn Kashmir into a military zone. Balance is needed - too much armed presence can scare away tourists too. Maybe discreet plainclothes security at major tourist spots? The SC is right about not demoralizing our forces though.
N
Neha T.
Why only hilly areas? Terrorists can strike anywhere! We need nationwide safety protocols. The VIP security comment hits home - why can't some of those resources be diverted to protect common citizens? 😔
S
Sanjay R.
The court made a good point - retired judges aren't investigators. Let's leave security matters to professionals. But yes, need better tourist safety measures. Maybe mandatory registration of tourist itineraries with local police when visiting sensitive areas?
K
Kavita P.
As someone from Jammu, this hurts deeply. Tourism is our lifeline. Instead of panic, we need smart solutions - better intelligence, community policing involving locals, and tourist awareness programs. The world must see Kashmir's beauty, not just headlines of violence.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50