Key Points

Pakistan is covertly funding terror groups like LeT and JeM through NGOs to dodge FATF scrutiny. State-backed terror financing has surged post-Operation Sindoor to rebuild destroyed infrastructure. The FATF may reinstate Pakistan’s Grey List status due to these brazen violations. India is closely tracking these activities to expose Pakistan’s terror financing network globally.

Key Points: Pakistan Uses NGOs to Fund Terror Groups and Evade FATF Scrutiny

  • Pakistan channels state funds to LeT and JeM via NGOs to avoid FATF detection
  • Post-Operation Sindoor, terror financing surged to rebuild lost infrastructure
  • FATF loopholes exploited as NGOs receive foreign funding for attacks
  • India monitors Pakistan’s terror financing to push for FATF action
3 min read

NGOs fronting Pakistan's terror financing network to evade FATF scrutiny

Pakistan funnels state funds to terror outfits via NGOs to bypass FATF oversight, risking a return to the Grey List amid rising terror financing.

NGOs fronting Pakistan's terror financing network to evade FATF scrutiny
"Around 10% of Pakistan’s developmental funds are being given to terror groups. – Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman"

New Delhi, Aug 18

Pakistan might well be pushed back into the Grey List by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). While the country may have claimed a moral victory after signing an alleged minerals deal with the United States, reports currently state that terror funding by the establishment has only increased.

Unchecked terror, extortion, and money laundering to benefit terror organisations are the norm in Pakistan. However, post Operation Sindoor, during which several infrastructures were wiped out, the establishment has been heavily funding outfits such as the Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammad.

More evidence of this was given by Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman, the chief of the Jamaat Ulema-e-Islam. Rehman said that a considerable amount of funds was being passed on to terror groups in the name of developmental funds. Around 10 per cent of Pakistan’s developmental funds are being given to terror groups, Rehman also alleged.

The Indian agencies have learnt that the funding for terror groups from the government’s coffers has increased after Operation Sindoor. The increase is related to these terror groups having to rebuild the infrastructure that was destroyed by the Indian armed forces.

The funds from the government’s coffers, however, do not reach these terror groups directly. There are scores of NGOs that these terror groups have formed, which have not yet come under the radar of the international agencies. Since these groups are not banned, the Pakistan establishment transfers the funds to such NGOs to make it look like a legitimate transaction.

Even if the FATF were to look into this funding, it would look legitimate, and this is Pakistan’s way of avoiding getting back into the Grey List.

Such funding gives terror groups a lifeline, which in turn makes them carry on with their operations. Pakistan’s spending is also to do with the fact that the army is facing losses in huge numbers due to the Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) and the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). The two groups have hit the army in Pakistan significantly over the past couple of years.

In such an event, the Pakistan establishment would need friendly terror groups such as the Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba to fight the battle against the TTP and BLA.

Pakistan is inventing newer strategies so that its terror funding does not catch the eye of the FATF. The FATF, in a recent report, had said that when an organisation is not designated at the multilateral level, it is more likely to engage in financial activities, including fundraising.

In past couple of months, several dormant accounts of these NGOs, which are run by terror groups, have been reactivated. These accounts in Pakistan also receive foreign funding, which in turn is used to carry out terror attacks.

India is keeping a close watch on these activities and would use them to corner Pakistan at the FATF.

Rehman, while pointing out the issue of state-funded terrorism, said that the practice today has become institutionalised. It has been undermining governance and security.

He also highlighted that for these terror groups, which have the backing of the establishment, extortion and ransom for kidnapping has become a parallel economy in Pakistan. The Pakistan establishment has taken a great risk in trying to institutionalise terror. These developments come in the wake of a scheduled visit by the team of the FATF, which would monitor and evaluate the situation.

Pakistan has got out of the Grey List with a lot of difficulty, but it would be no surprise if it is back on that, considering the kind of brazen activity that is going on in the country today.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Not surprised at all. Pakistan's establishment has mastered the art of deception. Their so-called "developmental funds" going to terror groups shows their priorities are completely messed up. 😡
A
Aman W
While I agree Pakistan's actions are condemnable, we should also focus on strengthening our own systems to prevent any such funding from reaching Indian soil. Vigilance is key!
S
Sarah B
The international community needs to wake up! If 10% of developmental funds are going to terror groups, it means less for actual development. Pakistani citizens are the real victims here.
K
Karthik V
Operation Sindoor showed Pakistan's true colors. Now they're trying to rebuild what we destroyed - good job by our armed forces! 🇮🇳 We need more such surgical strikes to keep them in check.
N
Nisha Z
The fact that even their own leaders like Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman are exposing this shows how deep the rot goes. Pakistan is literally funding the enemies of peace. Shameful!
D
David E
As someone working in international finance, I can confirm that tracking such disguised funding is extremely challenging. FATF needs better tools and more transparency requirements for NGOs operating in high-risk regions.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50