Key Points

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has stirred controversy by revealing details of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, alleging that Jawaharlal Nehru provided significant financial support to Pakistan. The treaty not only allocated water rights but also committed India to pay 62 million pounds for Pakistan's infrastructure development. Dubey claims this demonstrates the Gandhi family's alleged bias, though the treaty was suspended in 2025 due to terrorism concerns. The revelation highlights ongoing debates about historical diplomatic decisions and their long-term strategic implications.

Key Points: Nehru's Indus Treaty Gift Exposed by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey

  • BJP MP exposes financial provisions in 1960 Indus Waters Treaty
  • India paid 62 million pounds to Pakistan for infrastructure
  • Nehru's agreement criticized as strategic compromise
  • Treaty suspended in 2025 due to terrorism concerns
3 min read

Nehru's Rs 14,000 cr gift to Pakistan? Nishikant Dubey cites IWT clause to back claim

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey reveals Nehru's controversial Indus Waters Treaty, alleging Rs 14,000 cr financial support to Pakistan

"The Gandhi family fed the snake called Pakistan with both water and blood for 77 years - Nishikant Dubey"

New Delhi, June 6

BJP Lok Sabha MP Nishikant Dubey has once again targeted the Gandhi family, accusing them of favouring Pakistan at India's expense concerning the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT).

In a post on X, Dubey highlighted India's financial contributions to Pakistan under the treaty, suggesting that the Gandhi family's policies have been detrimental to India's interests.

Dubey, in a post on X, wrote in Hindi (translated in English): "The Gandhi family fed the snake called Pakistan with both water and blood for 77 years. But read this document carefully— in return for attacks on Indian lives, the Congress icon, Prime Minister Nehru, not only gave away 80 per cent of India’s water under the Indus Waters Treaty but also gave Pakistan what is today worth around Rs 14,000 crore for building dams and canals. Sell the country, fatten Pakistan by feeding it water, and die taking bullets and abuse—this is the India the Gandhi family created."

To support his claim, Dubey attached Article V (Financial Provisions) of the Indus Waters Treaty in his post, which confirms that India agreed to pay 62.06 million pounds (a massive sum at the time) as financial assistance to Pakistan for building replacement infrastructure. The payment was to be made in 10 equal annual instalments and was non-refundable, regardless of any provocations or hostilities.

The IWT, signed in 1960, allocated the three western rivers—the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab—to Pakistan, and the three eastern rivers—the Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej—to India. Despite this allocation, Article V of the treaty stipulates that India agreed to make a fixed contribution of 62,060,000 pounds towards the cost of constructing new headworks and canal systems for irrigation from the western rivers in Pakistan's Punjab province. This financial commitment was to be paid in 10 equal annual instalments, starting on November 1, 1960.

Dubey's criticism centres on this provision, questioning the rationale behind India's financial support to Pakistan, especially when the country was facing challenges related to terrorism and border security from there. He contends that such agreements, made during the tenure of the Congress-led government, have compromised India's strategic interests.

In April 2025, following a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, India suspended the treaty, citing national security concerns and asserting Pakistan's involvement in supporting terrorism. Prime Minister Narendra Modi assertively said that Pakistan would no longer receive water over which India holds rights, signalling a shift in India's approach to the treaty.

While the suspension of the treaty has been a significant development, the financial provisions under Article V remain a point of contention. Critics argue that India's contributions to Pakistan under the treaty were excessive, given the geopolitical dynamics and security challenges.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul K.
Nehru's decision must be seen in historical context - we were a young nation trying to establish peaceful relations. But looking back, was it wise to give both water AND money? 🤔 Pakistan has consistently used terrorism as state policy. Maybe it's time to renegotiate terms.
P
Priya M.
Why are we still debating decisions from 60+ years ago? Today's government has taken strong steps by suspending the treaty. Let's focus on current solutions rather than playing blame games. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
A
Arjun S.
The Rs 14,000 crore figure seems exaggerated when adjusted for inflation. But no denying that Pakistan has been an ungrateful neighbor. Water is becoming scarce - we must prioritize our farmers first. PM Modi is right to take tough stance now.
S
Sunita R.
As someone from Punjab, I've seen how water disputes affect farmers. The treaty did bring stability for decades, but Pakistan's actions forced India to reconsider. Hope the new approach brings better water security for our states!
V
Vikram D.
Dubey ji makes valid points but his language is too harsh. Diplomacy requires give-and-take. That said, in today's context, we must be firm - no freebies to nations supporting terrorism. Water is national security issue now.
N
Neha P.
The real issue isn't past decisions but how we manage water resources today. Our cities face shortages while we debate treaties. Let's invest in better water management and stop politicizing every issue! 💧

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50