SC Collegium Recommends 10 Judges for Punjab & Haryana, 3 for AP High Courts

The Supreme Court Collegium, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, has recommended 10 advocates as judges for the Punjab and Haryana High Court. In a separate decision, three judicial officers have been recommended for the Andhra Pradesh High Court. The appointments follow the memorandum of procedure governing High Court judge selections. The recommendations will now be forwarded to the central government for further processing.

Key Points: SC Collegium Recommends 13 Judges for High Courts

  • SC Collegium recommends 10 advocates as judges for Punjab & Haryana High Court
  • Three judicial officers recommended for Andhra Pradesh High Court
  • Appointments follow constitutional process under memorandum of procedure
  • Chief Justice Surya Kant headed the Collegium meeting on May 4
3 min read

SC Collegium recommends appointment of permanent judges in P&H, AP High Courts

Supreme Court Collegium recommends appointment of 10 advocates as judges for Punjab & Haryana High Court and 3 judicial officers for Andhra Pradesh High Court.

"The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 4th May, 2026, has approved the proposal for appointment of the following Advocates as Judges of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana - SC Collegium"

New Delhi, May 5

The Supreme Court Collegium, headed by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, has recommended the appointment of advocates and judicial officers as judges in the High Courts of Punjab and Haryana, and Andhra Pradesh.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, the apex court Collegium said that in its meeting held on May 4, it approved the proposal for the appointment of three advocates - Pravindra Singh Chauhan, Rajesh Gaur, and Minderjeet Yadav - as judges of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

"The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 4th May, 2026, has approved the proposal for appointment of the following Advocates as Judges of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana: (i) Shri Pravindra Singh Chauhan, (ii) Shri Rajesh Gaur, and (iii) Shri Minderjeet Yadav," the statement said.

In a separate statement, the Collegium also approved the appointment of seven more advocates as judges of the P&H High Court.

These include Monica Chhibber Sharma, Harmeet Singh Deol, Puja Chopra, Sunish Bindlish, Navdeep Singh, Divya Sharma, and Ravinder Malik.

"The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 4th May, 2026, has approved the proposal for appointment of the following Advocates as Judges of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana: (i) Ms. Monica Chhibber Sharma, (ii) Shri Harmeet Singh Deol, (iii) Ms. Puja Chopra, (iv) Shri Sunish Bindlish, (v) Shri Navdeep Singh, (vi) Ms. Divya Sharma, and (vii) Shri Ravinder Malik," it added.

Further, the Collegium approved the proposal for the appointment of three judicial officers - Sunitha Gandham, Alapati Giridhar, and Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi (also known as Ch. Purushottama Kumar) - as judges of the Andhra Pradesh High Court.

"The Supreme Court Collegium, in its meeting held on 4th May, 2026, has approved the proposal for appointment of the following Judicial Officers as Judges of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh: (i) Smt. Sunitha Gandham, (ii) Shri Alapati Giridhar, and (iii) Shri Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi @ Ch. Purushottama Kumar," the statement said.

As per the memorandum of procedure (MoP) governing the appointment of High Court judges, the proposal for appointment is initiated by the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned. If the Chief Minister wishes to recommend any name, it must be forwarded to the Chief Justice for consideration. The Governor, acting on the advice of the Chief Minister, forwards the recommendation along with the complete set of papers to the Union Minister of Law and Justice as early as possible and preferably within six weeks from receipt of the proposal.

The proposal is then examined by the Centre along with relevant background inputs before being sent to the CJI, who consults the two senior-most judges of the Supreme Court before finalising the recommendation.

Following these consultations, the CJI forwards his recommendation to the Union Minister of Law and Justice, ordinarily within four weeks. Once the warrant of appointment is signed by the President, the Secretary of the Department of Justice informs the Chief Justice, with a copy to the Chief Minister, and the appointment is subsequently notified in the Gazette of India.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Ten new judges for P&H High Court and three for Andhra Pradesh! That's a good boost for clearing pendency. With 4 crore cases pending across high courts, we need more judges like this. Hope these appointments happen quickly without delay from the Centre.
A
Arun Y
Finally some appointments for Andhra Pradesh! The state has been badly needing judges since bifurcation. But I wish more women were included - only three out of thirteen appointments. Judiciary needs to reflect our society better.
M
Michael C
Interesting to see the process detailed in the memorandum of procedure. It's quite intricate - involves the Chief Justice, Chief Minister, Governor, and the Centre. No wonder appointments take so long. But I appreciate the thoroughness, even if we want faster justice.
N
Neha E
Good step, but what about the pending vacancies in other high courts? The Allahabad High Court alone needs 50 more judges! Hope the Collegium looks at all states equitably instead of focusing only on some. Fingers crossed for more appointments soon. 🤞
J
James A
Impressive that advocates from private practice are being appointed as judges. It brings practical experience to the bench. However, I'm curious about the criteria for selection - is it based on merit, seniority, or connections? The system needs more accountability.
S
Suresh O
As a

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50