NewKerala.com Logo

Nadda reflected official position of BJP: Kerala BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar on Nishikant Dubey's SC remark

ANI April 20, 2025 298 views

Kerala BJP president Rajeev Chandrasekhar affirmed that JP Nadda's statement represents the party's official position on Nishikant Dubey's controversial Supreme Court remarks. The BJP has distanced itself from Dubey's comments, calling them personal opinions. Nadda emphasized the party's respect for the judiciary while instructing members to avoid such statements. The controversy stems from Dubey's allegations that the Supreme Court is exceeding its constitutional limits.

"JP Nadda has already spoken about the issue...what he tweeted reflects the official position of the BJP" - Rajeev Chandrasekhar"
Thiruvananthapuram, India, April 20: Kerala BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar on Sunday stated that BJP National President JP Nadda had clarified the party's official position on BJP MP Nishikant Dubey's controversial remarks about the Supreme Court.

Key Points

1

Nadda clarified BJP's rejection of Dubey's judiciary remarks

2

Kerala BJP chief aligns with party's official stance

3

Dubey accused SC of overreach in Parliament matters

4

BJP leaders instructed to avoid such statements

Speaking to ANI, Kerala BJP president Rajeev Chandrasekhar said, "JP Nadda has already spoken about the issue. He is our National President, and what he tweeted yesterday reflects the official position of the BJP. That is also my position."

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had "completely rejected" and distanced itself from controversial remarks made by the party MP Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma on the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of India.

The two MPs have also been asked to refrain from making such remarks.

In a post on X on Saturday, BJP National President JP Nadda said, "The Bharatiya Janata Party has nothing to do with the statements made by BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma on the judiciary and the Chief Justice of the country. These are their personal statements, but the BJP neither agrees with nor supports such statements. The BJP completely rejects these statements.

"Nadda added, "Bharatiya Janata Party has always respected the judiciary and gladly accepted its orders and suggestions because, as a party, we believe that all the courts of the country, including the Supreme Court, are an integral part of our democracy and are a strong pillar of the protection of the Constitution."

He further said that both MPs and others in the party have been instructed against making similar remarks in the future. "I have instructed both of them and everyone else not to make such statements," he wrote.

Earlier, BJP MP Nishikant Dubey alleged that the Supreme Court was "inciting religious wars" and questioned its authority, suggesting that the Parliament building should be closed if the apex court was to make laws.

"The top court has only one aim: 'Show me the face, and I will show you the law'. The Supreme Court is going beyond its limits. If one has to go to the Supreme Court for everything, then Parliament and State Assembly should be shut," Dubey told ANI.

Referring to past court decisions, Dubey criticised the judiciary for its handling of issues like the decriminalisation of homosexuality and religious disputes.

"There was an Article 377 in which homosexuality was a big crime. The Trump administration has said that there are only two sexes in this world, either male or female...Whether it is Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist, Jain or Sikh, all believe that homosexuality is a crime. One fine morning, the Supreme Court said that we abolish this case...Article 141 says that the laws we make, the judgments we give, are applicable from the lower court to the Supreme Court. Article 368 states that Parliament has the authority to enact all laws, and the Supreme Court has the power to interpret the law. The top court is asking the President and Governor to tell what they have to do regarding the Bills. When the Ram Mandir, Krishna Janmabhoomi, or Gyanvapi issue arises, you (SC) say, 'Show us the paper'. Mughals ke aane ke baad jo Masjid banne hai unke liye keh raho ho paper kaha se dikhao," he added.

Dubey further alleged that the Supreme Court wants to take this country towards "anarchy."

"How can you give direction to the appointing authority? The President appoints the Chief Justice of India. The Parliament makes the law of this country. You will dictate that Parliament?... How did you make a new law? In which law is it written that the President has to make a decision within three months? This means that you want to take this country towards anarchy. When the Parliament sits, there will be a detailed discussion on this," he said.

Meanwhile, BJP leader Dinesh Sharma stated that no one can "challenge" the President, as the President is "supreme." "There is an apprehension among the public that when Dr BR Ambedkar wrote the Constitution, the rights of the Legislative and Judiciary were clearly written...According to the Constitution of India, no one can direct the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The President has already given her assent to it. No one can challenge the President, as the President is supreme," Sharma told ANI.

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
Glad to see the BJP leadership taking a clear stand on this. Respect for judiciary is fundamental to our democracy. The party's quick response shows discipline. 👍
R
Rahul S.
While I appreciate Nadda's clarification, this isn't the first time BJP MPs have made controversial remarks. The party needs stronger internal mechanisms to prevent such incidents.
A
Anjali M.
The separation of powers is so important! Judges interpret laws, Parliament makes them. Both should respect each other's domains. Dubey's comments were really concerning 😕
V
Vikram P.
Interesting how this plays out in Kerala politics. Chandrasekhar is walking a tightrope between local sentiments and central leadership. Wonder if this will affect BJP's prospects in the state.
S
Sunita R.
The speed at which Nadda responded shows how seriously they take this issue. Judiciary is the guardian of our constitution - no elected representative should undermine it.
K
Karthik N.
While I don't agree with Dubey's tone, he raises some valid questions about judicial overreach. The balance between legislature and judiciary needs constant attention in a vibrant democracy like ours.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published

Disclaimer: Comments are the opinions of users and not of this website or it's staff. News stories are provided by news agencies. We do not guarantee their accuracy. Inappropriate content may be removed. By posting, you agree to our terms.

You May Like!