Key Points

Manipur's Naga groups met with Ministry of Home Affairs officials to oppose the scrapping of the Free Movement Regime and border fencing along the India-Myanmar border. The United Naga Council described the meeting as inconclusive and will decide their next steps after returning to Imphal. This follows their 20-day ultimatum to the central government regarding what they call the "unilateral abrogation" of border agreements. Nagaland Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio has also expressed concern, stating these changes would affect historical and cultural ties of Nagas living on both sides of the border.

Key Points: Manipur Naga Groups Oppose India Myanmar Border Fencing FMR Scrapping

  • MHA advisor A.K. Mishra led talks with 11-member Naga delegation in New Delhi
  • UNC President Ng. Lorho headed the group representing three Naga bodies
  • Meeting held after 20-day ultimatum to Centre over FMR abrogation expired
  • Nagaland CM Neiphiu Rio urges government to review sensitive border movement issue
3 min read

Manipur Naga bodies meet MHA officials, oppose scrapping of old FMR, India-Myanmar border fencing

United Naga Council meets MHA officials in Delhi, demands reinstatement of Free Movement Regime and halting of border fencing along India-Myanmar frontier.

"After returning to Imphal on Wednesday, we would discuss the outcome... and decide the next course of action - UNC Spokesman"

New Delhi/Imphal, Aug 26

Officials of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) and leaders of three Naga groups in Manipur held a meeting over the demand for reinstatement of the old Free Movement Regime (FMR) and stoppage of the ongoing fencing along the India-Myanmar border.

The MHA official team was led by A. K. Mishra, advisor to the MHA on Northeast Affairs, while the 11-member Naga delegation was headed by United Naga Council (UNC) President Ng. Lorho and comprised representatives of the UNC, the All Naga Students' Association, Manipur (ANSAM), and the Naga Women's Union (NWU).

A spokesman of the UNC said that Tuesday’s New Delhi meeting was "inconclusive".

"After returning to Imphal on Wednesday, we would discuss the outcome of the meeting with the MHA and decide the next course of action," he said.

The UNC had previously issued an ultimatum to the Central government and held a meeting with Manipur Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla on August 16 to discuss the reinstatement of the old FMR and stoppage of border fencing along 398 km India-Myanmar border with Manipur.

The UNC and other Naga bodies have been agitating in support of their demands since last year, opposing the "unilateral abrogation of FMR and construction of border fencing along the India-Myanmar border".

Tuesday’s meeting with MHA officials in New Delhi and the UNC-Governor meeting on August 16 in Imphal came against the backdrop of the expiry of the 20-day ultimatum served by the UNC to both the Centre and the state government regarding what it described as the "unilateral abrogation" of the FMR and the ongoing border fencing works.

Nagaland Chief Minister Neiphiu Rio, in his Independence Day speech in Kohima, expressed his concern over the Centre’s decision to trim down the FMR along the India-Myanmar border from the earlier 16 km to 10 km and limit movement to nine crossing points.

He had urged the Union government to be flexible and review the sensitive issue.

The MHA last year announced that the FMR, which earlier allowed people residing along the India-Myanmar border to travel 16 km into each other’s territory without a visa, would be scrapped soon. Instead, it had decided to adopt a new scheme to issue a pass to the border residents of both India and Myanmar living within 10 km on either side of the frontier to regulate cross-border movements.

The Nagaland Assembly earlier unanimously decided that an all-party delegation would meet the Union Home Minister to explain to him the "sentiment and resentment of the Naga people" against the MHA’s decision to cancel the FMR between India and Myanmar.

Participating in the discussion on the issue, the Chief Minister had told the house that the border movement restriction would affect the long-standing historical, ethnic, social, cultural, traditional and economic ties of Nagas living on both sides of the India-Myanmar border.

The Nagaland and Mizoram governments and a large number of political parties and civil societies in the two northeastern states have been opposing both border fencing and the scrapping of the old FMR.

Four northeastern states -- Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Nagaland, and Mizoram -- share a 1,643-km unfenced border with Myanmar. The MHA had earlier decided to erect fencing on the entire porous border, known for the smuggling of arms, ammunition, narcotics and various other contrabands, at a cost of Rs 31,000 crore.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I understand security concerns, we must respect the cultural and familial bonds that cross borders. There should be a balanced approach that addresses both security and the needs of local communities. 🤝
A
Aditya G
National security must come first. The porous border has been misused for smuggling and illegal activities for too long. The government is right to take measures to secure our borders.
M
Meera T
As someone from the Northeast, I can tell you that these decisions are made in Delhi without understanding ground realities. The government should consult local communities more before implementing such changes.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see how India is balancing security concerns with regional ethnic ties. This seems like a complex issue that requires careful handling. Hope they find a solution that works for everyone.
V
Vikram M
The government should have had proper consultations before making such decisions. Now they're meeting after issuing ultimatums - this is not how governance should work. Better dialogue is needed.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50