Amid Polls and Protests: Maharashtra's Curtailed Winter Session Sparks Fury

The winter session of the Maharashtra Legislature has been finalized for December 8 to 14 in Nagpur, a shorter duration than initially planned. This curtailment is due to the second phase of Nagar Parishad and Nagar Panchayat elections scheduled for December 20. Opposition parties are fiercely criticizing the short session and the delay in appointing official Leaders of the Opposition in both houses. The ruling BJP has dismissed these criticisms, leading to a heated political clash ahead of the session.

Key Points: Maharashtra Winter Session Dates Set Amid Opposition Criticism

  • Winter session shortened to one week due to upcoming local body elections on December 20
  • Opposition parties demand three-week session and immediate appointment of opposition leaders
  • BJP legislator counters, accusing opposition of hypocrisy over session duration
  • Shiv Sena (UBT) alleges government fears facing tough questions from a united opposition
3 min read

Maha Legislature's winter session from December 8 to 14

Maharashtra's winter session is cut to Dec 8-14 in Nagpur, sparking opposition protests over duration and delayed leadership appointments.

"It is unconstitutional to hold winter session of the state legislature in the absence of the leaders of the opposition. - Anil Parab, Shiv Sena (UBT) legislator"

Mumbai, Dec 3

Amid local body polls, the winter session of the Maharashtra Legislature will be held from December 8 to 14 in Nagpur.

The schedule was finalised on Wednesday at the meetings of the Business Advisory Committee (BAC) of the state Assembly and Council held at Vidhan Bhavan.

The winter session duration was earlier announced from December 8 to 19, when both Houses were prorogued after the conclusion of the monsoon session held in July.

However, the winter session duration has been curtailed as polling during the second phase of the Nagar Parishad and Nagar Panchayat elections is slated for December 20 and counting on December 21.

Speaker Rahul Narwekar chaired the BAC meeting of the state Assembly, while state council Chairman Ram Shinde presided over the BAC meeting of the upper house.

The opposition parties, including Shiv Sena (UBT), Congress and NCP(SP), during the BAC meetings strongly demanded that the duration of the winter session should be not less than three weeks.

They also demanded that the appointment of leaders of the opposition in the state council and Assembly, respectively, should be done without further delays.

Shiv Sena (UBT) legislator Anil Parab confirmed that he and Congress legislator Satej Patil met Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, demanding the appointment of leaders of the opposition.

"It is unconstitutional to hold winter session of the state legislature in the absence of the leaders of the opposition," he said.

He added that the Chief Minister assured them they would "consider the matter positively."

Shiv Sena (UBT) legislator Bhaskar Jadhav criticised the government's "dilly-dallying" over the appointment of leaders of the opposition in the state Council and Assembly, saying that the government fears the opposition's presence.

"They (ministers) are not brave enough to face the opposition's barrage of questions," he claimed. Jadhav slammed the state government for "curtailing" the winter session, demanding that its duration should have been three weeks.

Shiv Sena (UBT) legislator Anil Parab attributed the short duration of the winter session to the impending Municipal Corporation elections in Mumbai, Pune, Nashik, and other major cities, suggesting the government is reluctant to address issues comprehensively before the polls.

"A one-week session is not enough to raise all of Maharashtra's issues. We only hope that at least Vidarbha's core issues can be addressed since the session is in Nagpur," he remarked.

Bhaskar Jadhav argued that the government is "not prepared to extend the session" because, despite having a large majority, "they do not have answers to the torrent of questions from the opposition".

Bhaskar Jadhav launched a scathing attack on the State Election Commission (SEC) for its alleged inaction on pre-election financial schemes.

"The current State Election Commission seems to be blind, mute, and deaf and working for a political party. Previously, the SEC used to immediately stay financial schemes announced just before elections. But this commission is watching with open eyes while government money is being distributed to buy people's votes," he commented.

In a sharp counterattack, BJP legislator Ram Kadam dismissed the opposition's criticism of the session duration.

"These are the same people who used to wrap up the session in two or three days when they were in power. They are now teaching us how long a session should be," he retorted.

"These frustrated people need medical treatment," he said.

Kadam affirmed that the Chief Minister and both Deputy Chief Ministers, Eknath Shinde and Ajit Pawar, were fully prepared to answer all the opposition's questions and that the BJP does not work based on election schedules, as elections are a matter for the State Election Commission.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rahul R
Ram Kadam has a point. When Uddhav Thackeray was CM, sessions were even shorter. The opposition is just creating noise because they have no real issues. Let the government work, elections or no elections.
S
Suresh O
Holding the session without appointing LoP is indeed questionable. The opposition's voice needs to be properly structured in the house. This delay doesn't look good for our democracy, regardless of which party you support.
A
Anjali F
All this drama just before Mumbai and Pune civic polls! Clearly, the shortened session is to avoid tough questions on infrastructure, flooding, and unemployment. Our politicians always put elections before governance. 😒
M
Michael C
Interesting to see the dynamics here. The criticism about the State Election Commission is serious. If pre-election schemes are being used to influence voters, that undermines the entire process. Needs proper investigation.
K
Karthik V
At least the session is happening in Nagpur. Usually everything is Mumbai-centric. Hope they discuss the orange farmer issues and the slow pace of the Samruddhi Mahamarg. Nagpur deserves this attention.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50