Key Points

The Kerala High Court scrapped the KEAM rank list after a CBSE student challenged the mark consolidation method. Justice D K Singh noted the revised formula disadvantaged CBSE students compared to state syllabus peers. The government has appealed the verdict while students await fresh evaluation. This marks another chapter in Kerala's long-running exam fairness debate.

Key Points: Kerala HC Cancels KEAM Rank List Orders Fresh Evaluation

  • Kerala HC cancels KEAM rank list citing unfair mark consolidation
  • CBSE student Hana Fathima challenged revised evaluation formula
  • Court ruled prospectus changes at admission stage were improper
  • State government appeals decision as Division Bench hearing set
2 min read

Kerala HC cancels KEAM rank list, orders fresh evaluation

Kerala High Court quashes KEAM rank list, directs fresh evaluation following CBSE student's petition against mark consolidation formula.

"The revised method of calculating ranks adversely affected CBSE students - Justice D K Singh"

Kochi, July 9

The Kerala government has filed an appeal against the High Court single bench order quashing the KEAM rank list. The appeal will be considered by the Division Bench on Thursday.

The High Court quashed the Kerala Engineering, Architecture, and Medical (KEAM) exam results announced by the government after consolidating marks in the new formula. The single bench of the High Court also ordered that the KEAM rank list be revised.

The state government announced the KEAM results last week based on the new formula, considering the long-standing complaint of Kerala syllabus students that marks were being reduced due to mark consolidation.

Hana Fathima, a student who passed Plus Two in the CBSE syllabus, filed the petition, questioning the consolidation of marks in the rank list. The state government announced the results last week based on the new formula, considering the long-standing complaint of Kerala syllabus students that marks were reduced due to the consolidation of marks.

The Plus Two student approached the High Court challenging this. The High Court's action accepted the student's argument that the prospectus was changed at the final stage of the admission process.

The High Court's verdict also took into account the argument that CBSE students had lost the weightage they had earlier due to the new equation for consolidation of marks. The government had announced yesterday that the rank list was prepared by considering the marks obtained in the entrance exam and Plus Two together. There were complaints that when the previous equation was prepared, Kerala syllabus students scored 15 to 20 marks less than CBSE students.

Justice D K Singh delivered the ruling, observing that the revised method of calculating engineering entrance ranks adversely affected students from the CBSE syllabus.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
As a Kerala syllabus student, I understand both sides. The previous system was unfair to us, but changing rules last minute isn't solution. Government should have consulted education experts before implementing new formula. This back-and-forth is causing unnecessary stress for all students 😔
R
Rahul R
Typical Kerala government mess! Every year there's some controversy with KEAM. Why can't they have a stable evaluation system like other states? Students' futures are at stake here, not some political game.
A
Ananya R
Kudos to Hana Fathima for standing up against this injustice! It takes courage to fight the system. Hope this sets a precedent for fair evaluation across all education boards in India. #EqualOpportunity
N
Nikhil C
The real issue is our obsession with marks and ranks. When will we focus on actual learning rather than these complicated evaluation systems? Both CBSE and state boards have their merits - this competition helps no one.
P
Priya S
As a parent, this uncertainty is terrifying. My daughter couldn't sleep for days worrying about her college admission. Government should compensate affected students for this mental trauma. At least HC intervened on time!

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50