Key Points

The Jharkhand High Court has granted significant relief to Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case related to his 2018 remarks about Amit Shah. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary quashed the lower court's order and sent the matter back for reconsideration. The case originated from Gandhi's statement calling Amit Shah a "murderer" during a Congress convention. The High Court's decision highlights potential procedural irregularities in the original court proceedings.

Key Points: Rahul Gandhi Wins Jharkhand HC Relief in Amit Shah Defamation Case

  • Jharkhand HC sets aside criminal defamation case against Rahul Gandhi
  • Court finds lower court's cognizance order problematic
  • Original complaint stemmed from 2018 Congress convention remarks
  • High Court directs fresh consideration of the case
2 min read

Jharkhand HC grants relief to Rahul Gandhi in defamation case over remarks on HM Amit Shah

Jharkhand High Court quashes defamation case against Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Amit Shah, sending matter back to lower court

"No murderer can become the national president of the Congress - Rahul Gandhi"

Ranchi, Oct 9

The Jharkhand High Court has granted temporary relief to Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, in a criminal defamation case linked to his alleged derogatory remarks against Union Home Minister Amit Shah.

A single-judge bench of Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary on Thursday quashed the Chaibasa MP-MLA court's order taking cognisance of the case and issuing summons to LoP Rahul Gandhi.

The High Court also sent the matter back to the lower court for fresh consideration. The court observed that the magistrate appeared to have been influenced by the directions of the Sessions Court while taking cognisance.

The case stems from a statement LoP Rahul Gandhi made during a Congress convention in 2018, where he allegedly referred to then-BJP national president Amit Shah as a "murderer." The remark sparked controversy and prompted BJP leader Pratap Katiyar of Chaibasa to file a criminal defamation complaint.

According to the complaint, LoP Rahul Gandhi said, "No murderer can become the national president of the Congress. Congressmen cannot accept a murderer as their president -- this is possible only in the BJP."

Following the complaint, the Chaibasa MP-MLA Court had first issued a bailable warrant against Gandhi in April 2022, and later a non-bailable warrant in February 2024.

LoP Rahul Gandhi's plea for exemption from personal appearance under Section 205 of the CrPC was also rejected by the trial court, prompting him to approach the High Court.

In March 2024, the High Court granted him temporary relief and disposed of his petition.

However, the Chaibasa court issued another non-bailable warrant on May 22, 2025, after which LoP Rahul Gandhi appeared before the court on August 6, 2025, and was granted conditional bail.

Subsequently, LoP Rahul Gandhi again challenged the MP-MLA Court's decision to take cognisance and issue summons, arguing that the lower court had failed to apply its independent judicial mind.

The High Court accepted this argument and set aside the cognisance order, directing the lower court to reconsider the matter in accordance with the law.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I'm glad the High Court intervened, I wish Rahul Gandhi would focus more on constructive politics rather than personal attacks. Our country needs mature leadership from both sides 🤔
A
Aditya G
The judiciary is doing its job properly. If the magistrate was indeed influenced by higher courts, then the High Court was absolutely right to send it back. Justice must be impartial, not politically motivated.
S
Sarah B
This case has been going on since 2018? That's 7 years of legal battles over one statement! Our courts have more important matters to handle than political squabbles. Both parties should focus on governance instead.
N
Nikhil C
Calling someone a murderer without evidence is crossing the line, no matter which party you belong to. Political discourse in India needs to maintain basic dignity. The High Court's decision shows our legal system works to maintain balance.
M
Meera T
As a law student, I find this judgment very interesting. The High Court emphasizing that magistrates must apply independent judicial mind is crucial for our democracy. This sets an important precedent! 📚⚖️

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50