NewKerala.com

Political Firestorm: Leaders Condemn Madani's Jihad Remarks Amid Constitutional Debate

Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind chief Mahmood Madani has stirred a major controversy with his comments on jihad. He suggested the concept should be taught in schools, arguing it's been misunderstood and linked to violence. Leaders from the BJP, Congress, and Shiv Sena have united in sharp criticism of his remarks. They are all emphasizing that India is governed strictly by its Constitution and law, not by any religious interpretation.

Key Points: Leaders Condemn Mahmood Madani Jihad Remarks Uphold Constitution

  • Maulana Mahmood Madani suggests introducing jihad in school curricula for clarity
  • BJP leaders accuse Madani of reviving Muslim League ideology
  • Congress MP Imran Masood says jihad is for national crisis, not distortion
  • Shiv Sena MP calls it a polarizing tactic to divert from real issues
3 min read

'India will be guided only by Constitution': Leaders condemn Mahmood Madani's jihad remarks

Leaders across parties slam Jamiat chief Mahmood Madani's call to teach jihad in schools, asserting India is governed solely by the Constitution, not religious ideology.

"India runs by the Constitution. Anyone who carries out jihad in India will not be spared by the law. - Union Minister Giriraj Singh"

New Delhi, Dec 3

Leaders across party lines on Wednesday sharply criticised Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind (JUH) President Maulana Mahmood Madani for his recent comments on 'jihad', stressing that India functions strictly under the Constitution and will not accept any statement that contradicts it.

Madani, in an exclusive interview with IANS, had said that the idea of 'jihad' holds relevance not just for Muslims but for the entire nation, and suggested that it should be introduced in school curricula so children can understand its essence.

He said 'jihad' (a term traditionally used for a struggle or fight against the enemies of Islam or to safeguard the Muslim community) has been repeatedly misinterpreted and deliberately linked with violence.

His remarks triggered strong political reactions, with several leaders calling the statements "unfortunate".

Union Minister Giriraj Singh told reporters, "India runs by the Constitution. Anyone who carries out jihad in India will not be spared by the law."

BJP National General Secretary Tarun Chugh also hit out at the JUH chief, telling IANS, "Madani's remarks are an attempt to revive the ideology of the Muslim League in India, and it is extremely unfortunate. The country will be run by the Constitution and the law, not by 'jihad'. Some people are supporting soft terrorism and trying to spread urban terrorism. India does not accept this. The country is run by the Constitution and law, not terrorism or jihad."

BJP MP Shashank Mani Tripathi said the public will "teach a lesson to such Maulanas".

"I believe the entire country will stand against such people. What does jihad mean? Talking about jihad with open intentions is completely against our Constitution," he told IANS.

Congress MP Imran Masood said Madani appeared to be presenting a distorted version of the concept.

Speaking to IANS, he said, "Yes, jihad is a term that should be taught. Look, jihad is for the country, for the nation. It is meant for times when the country faces a crisis. However, I don't know where he (Madani) is taking the concept of jihad."

Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi described the remarks as a deliberate effort to polarise and divert public attention from real issues.

"I reiterate that a well-thought-out strategy is being carried out. When the BJP and its B-team speakers raise certain issues, on one side, Rajnath Singh speaks about the Babri Masjid, and on the other, Mahmood Madani talks about jihad; there is again an attempt to push the Hindu-Muslim narrative, but the main issues of the nation -- be it corruption or terrorism -- remain ignored, and people get distracted," Chaturvedi told IANS.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
While I understand the Maulana's point about misinterpretation, introducing 'jihad' in school curriculum is a terrible idea. Our education should focus on science, maths, and civic sense, not on religious concepts that can be easily misunderstood. Let's keep religion at home and in places of worship.
A
Arun Y
Priyanka Chaturvedi makes a valid point about distraction from real issues. Every time elections are near, these polarizing topics emerge. What about inflation, unemployment, and farmers' issues? That's what we should be discussing, not this. 🙄
S
Sarah B
As someone living in India for 5 years, I find this debate fascinating. In Western contexts, religious education is often separate from state curriculum. India's secular framework seems strong, but these debates test its boundaries. The constitutional focus is the right approach.
K
Karthik V
The term 'jihad' has been so heavily politicized and associated with violence globally that it's naive to think it can be taught neutrally in schools. Our teachers have enough on their plates. Constitution, national integration, and scientific temper should be the pillars of education. Jai Hind!
M
Meera T
I respectfully disagree with the harsh tone against Madani sahab. If he's talking about jihad as a spiritual struggle for self-improvement, which is its primary meaning in Islam, then what's wrong with teaching that? But maybe schools aren't the right place. Community centers could do it better.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50