Key Points

The Himachal Pradesh High Court is scrutinizing the six-month extension given to Chief Secretary Prabodh Saxena. A PIL challenges the move citing violation of service rules and his involvement in the INX Media corruption case. Separately, the court redirected a Rs 5 lakh fine towards a disaster relief initiative. The matter has been adjourned to September 22 for further hearing.

Key Points: Himachal HC Questions Chief Secretary Saxena Extension and Rs 5 Lakh Fine

  • Court questions if Saxena's extension violates DoPT guidelines and service rules
  • Petitioner argues vigilance clearance invalid due to INX Media chargesheet
  • Rs 5 lakh fine redirected to High Court-administered disaster relief fund
  • Chief Minister Sukhu sought a one-year extension but Centre approved only six months
3 min read

Himachal Pradesh HC questions six-month extension to chief secretary; Rs 5 lakh fine redirected to disaster relief fund

Himachal Pradesh High Court examines the six-month extension of Chief Secretary Prabodh Saxena amid corruption charges and redirects a Rs 5 lakh fine to disaster relief.

"The proposal is that the Secretaries of the DLSA of all districts will identify certain spots... which may go a long way to ameliorate the affected people of the state. - High Court Order"

Shimla, September 6

The Himachal Pradesh High Court has deferred to September 22 the hearing on a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the six-month extension granted to Chief Secretary Prabodh Saxena, while also allowing the state government to redirect a previously imposed fine of Rs 5 lakh towards a High Court-administered disaster relief fund.

A division bench of Chief Justice GS Sandhawalia and Justice Ranjan Sharma is examining whether the March 28 order granting Saxena an extension was in violation of Central Service Rules and Department of Personnel & Training (DoPT) guidelines.

The Union of India, in its reply, confirmed that Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu had sought a one-year extension, citing Saxena's role in key public-interest projects. However, the competent authority approved only six months, citing the cap under Rule 16(1) of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefit) Rules, 1958.

Petitioner Atul Sharma has sought the quashing of the extension, arguing that vigilance clearance cannot be granted to an officer facing a corruption case under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Saxena, a 1990-batch IAS officer, is chargesheeted in the INX Media scam and had earlier been granted exemption from personal appearance in the case.

On August 13, the court summoned the entire record from the Centre and the State regarding the extension, which was produced on September 4 in a sealed cover and retained by the court. The matter will be heard next on September 22, after counsel for Saxena sought more time.

In a separate order, the High Court modified its June 20 direction imposing a Rs 5 lakh cost on the state government for the delay in appointing the Himachal Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HP RERA) chairman and member. The bench directed that the amount be deposited with the Registrar (Accounts) within a week for use in a relief initiative for victims of this year's severe weather.

The court's disaster relief drive mirrors a similar effort in 2023, calling for voluntary contributions in cash, clothing, medicines, and utensils from judges, court staff, and advocates. The Secretaries of the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA) will identify affected areas for distribution, with funds disbursed via the State Legal Services Authority.

"The proposal is that the Secretaries of the DLSA of all districts will identify certain spots in their respective districts for distribution of the relief amount from voluntary donations... which may go a long way to ameliorate the affected people of the state," the order stated.

The Registrar (Accounts) has been appointed as the nodal officer for receiving cash contributions, while DLSA secretaries will oversee on-ground delivery to those most in need.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Good decision to redirect the fine to disaster relief. Our state suffered so much in recent floods - every rupee counts for affected families ❤️
A
Aman W
The CM should explain why he wanted one-year extension for an officer involved in INX Media case. Transparency is needed in such appointments.
S
Sarah B
Appreciate the court's practical approach - instead of just penalizing, they're ensuring the money actually helps people in need. More institutions should think like this!
V
Vikram M
The disaster relief initiative by judiciary is commendable. Last year's efforts helped many families in remote areas. Hope this year's contribution reaches the most vulnerable.
K
Karthik V
While I support scrutiny of extensions, let's not forget that experienced officers are needed for disaster management in hilly states like HP. Balance is important.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50