Sabarimala Gold Theft: Why Vasu's Handcuffing Breached Legal Protocol

The investigation into former TDB president N. Vasu's handcuffing has concluded without recommending disciplinary action. Police claimed they acted with Vasu's consent and followed jail authority instructions for security. However, the report acknowledged the handcuffing violated legal norms under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The incident has caused embarrassment to the government despite no punitive measures being taken.

Key Points: Sabarimala Gold Theft Accused Vasu Handcuffing Probe Concludes

  • Police claimed handcuffing was done with Vasu's consent for security reasons
  • Officers cited jail authority instructions to prevent escape attempts
  • Separate report found violation of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions
  • State Police chief expressed dissatisfaction with legal guideline handling
  • Incident caused government embarrassment despite no disciplinary action
  • Vasu maintains close political ties with Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan
2 min read

'Handcuffing of Sabarimala gold theft accused breached legal protocol'

Investigation finds police violated legal norms by handcuffing former TDB president N. Vasu in Sabarimala gold theft case, causing government embarrassment.

"The action was not deliberate misconduct - AR Commandant's enquiry report"

Thiruvananthapuram, Nov 26

The investigation into the handcuffing of former Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) president and Devaswom Commissioner N. Vasu, an accused in the Sabarimala gold theft case, during his court appearance early this week has concluded without recommending disciplinary action against the police officers. However, the report acknowledged that the act contravened legal norms and caused embarrassment to the government.

Vasu was taken from Poojappura Central Jail, here to the Kollam Vigilance Court in handcuffs by officers from the Thiruvananthapuram Armed Reserve (AR) Camp.

The police maintained that only one hand was cuffed, and that too with the consent of the accused.

They claimed the step was taken in compliance with instructions from the jail authorities, who had directed that strict security protocols be followed to prevent any escape.

The police also stated that Special Investigation Team (SIT) officials were present at the time.

The escort team comprised an SI and four constables from the AR camp.

They informed investigators that Vasu had been notified beforehand, and that the handcuffing was not intended to humiliate or disrespect him.

The enquiry, led by the AR Commandant, concluded that the action was not deliberate misconduct.

However, a separate report submitted to the Special Branch DGP observed that the officers violated provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which clearly specifies the categories of offenders who may be handcuffed.

It noted that Vasu’s age and the nature of his alleged offences did not warrant handcuffing.

Incidentally the State Police chief expressed dissatisfaction with the handling of the situation, stating that the police failed to consider key legal guidelines.

The incident, according to the report, not only breached procedural norms but also reflected poorly on the government.

Although no punitive action has been recommended, the report underscores the need for stricter adherence to legal protocols in handling accused persons, particularly in sensitive cases involving public figures.

Vasu a former CPI-M backed president of a village council in his early days, later went on to become the Commissioner of the TDB and then the president too and all along he has been a loyal aide to Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
Sabarimala gold theft is a serious crime involving temple funds. While procedures should be followed, let's not forget the main issue - someone allegedly stole from a sacred temple! The focus should be on recovering the gold and ensuring justice.
A
Arjun K
Typical Kerala politics! When it's someone connected to the ruling party, suddenly procedures matter. What about ordinary citizens who face much worse? The system should be equal for everyone, not just VIPs. 😐
S
Sarah B
The police claim he consented to handcuffing? That sounds suspicious. Who would voluntarily agree to be handcuffed in public? This seems like an attempt to cover up procedural lapses. The investigation should have been more thorough.
V
Vikram M
As a lawyer, I can confirm that handcuffing norms are very specific under Indian law. Age, nature of offense, and escape risk are all factors. The police clearly overstepped here. No disciplinary action sends the wrong message to law enforcement. 👨‍⚖️
M
Michael C
While the procedural violation is concerning, I appreciate that the report at least acknowledged the mistake. Sometimes police officers need better training on legal protocols. Hopefully this incident leads to improved guidelines and training.
A
Ananya R

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50