Key Points

A fresh FIR has been filed against Vivek Agnihotri over the portrayal of freedom fighter Gopal Mukherjee in 'The Bengal Files'. The FIR was lodged by Mukherjee’s grandson, who objects to his grandfather being called a "butcher" in the film. This comes after Agnihotri sought dismissal of two earlier FIRs related to the movie. The Calcutta High Court has imposed an interim stay on the previous cases.

Key Points: Vivek Agnihotri Faces FIR Over Gopal Patha Portrayal in The Bengal Files

  • FIR alleges wrongful portrayal of freedom fighter Gopal Mukherjee
  • Grandson claims family permission was not sought
  • Agnihotri previously sought dismissal of two other FIRs
  • Calcutta HC imposed interim stay on earlier cases
2 min read

Fresh FIR filed against Vivek Agnihotri for 'wrongly' portraying character in 'The Bengal Files'

Freedom fighter’s grandson files FIR against Vivek Agnihotri for allegedly misrepresenting Gopal Mukherjee in 'The Bengal Files'.

"We take strong objection to describing our grandfather as ‘a butcher’ in the movie. – Santana Mukherjee"

Kolkata, Aug 18

Fresh trouble seems to be brewing for 'The Bengal Files' Director Vivek Agnihotri, as a new FIR has been registered against him on charges of "wrongfully" describing freedom fighter Gopal Mukherjee a.k.a Gopal Patha "as a butcher", in the movie, the trailer of which has been released recently.

Gopal Mukherjee’s grandson, Santana Mukherjee, who has registered the fresh FIR, said they have taken exception to portraying his grandfather in the movie without the prior permission of the family members.

“Secondly, we take strong objection to describing our grandfather as ‘a butcher’ in the movie. Besides being a part of the freedom-fighters' group, 'Anushilon Samity', my grandfather owned two goat-meat shops. He was a wrestler. He took to arms to protect people from the communal violence unleashed by the Muslim League in Kolkata in 1946,” Santana Mukherjee said.

On July 31, Agnihotri and his wife Pallavi Joshi approached a single-judge bench of the Calcutta High Court seeking dismissal of two other FIRs filed against 'The Bengal Files'.

An FIR was registered against the movie in Murshidabad district soon after the teaser campaign for the movie was released.

Later, another FIR was also registered at Lake Town Police in Kolkata. The main accusation in the FIR was that the movie might contain some sensitive matter that may hamper the communal harmony in the state.

On August 4, a single-judge bench of Justice Jay Sengupta imposed an interim stay on the FIRs filed against the upcoming movie.

'The Bengal Files' is perceived to be the third part of the 'Files' trilogy -- the first being 'The Tashkent Files', which was released in 2019, and the second was the much-controversial 'The Kashmir Files' released in 2022.

Previously, the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government had been accused of issuing gag orders against the feature films on allegedly “flimsy” grounds.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Shreya B
As a Bengali, I'm deeply hurt by this portrayal of our freedom fighters. Gopal Patha was a hero who protected Hindus during Direct Action Day. Calling him 'butcher' is disrespectful to his legacy. 😠 Films should be responsible with history.
A
Aman W
Another FIR? Seriously? This is becoming a pattern - anyone makes a film about real history and suddenly there are legal cases. Let the movie release first, then criticize if needed. Preemptive FIRs just show intolerance.
P
Priyanka N
I watched The Kashmir Files and felt it was one-sided. Hope The Bengal Files presents a more balanced view. Historical films shouldn't become propaganda tools for any side. We need nuanced storytelling in India.
K
Karan T
The grandson has every right to be upset if his grandfather is being misrepresented. But let's wait for the full movie before jumping to conclusions. Trailers often take things out of context for dramatic effect.
N
Nisha Z
Why is Mamata government always so quick to ban films? First Taslima Nasreen's books, now this. Either believe in freedom of expression or don't. This selective outrage is hypocritical. 🙄
V
Varun X
The 1946 Calcutta killings were brutal on both sides. If the

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50