Security Tightened in Dhar Ahead of High Court Verdict on Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Dispute

Police have tightened security in Dhar district ahead of the Madhya Pradesh High Court's verdict on the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex dispute. District Collector Rajiv Ranjan Meena appealed for peace and warned against spreading rumours or misinformation. The dispute centers on whether the ASI-protected monument is a Hindu temple dedicated to Goddess Vagdevi or a Muslim mosque. The court heard arguments for 25 days and reserved its decision after the ASI submitted a detailed survey report.

Key Points: Dhar Security Tightened Ahead of Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Verdict

  • Security tightened in Dhar ahead of MP HC verdict on Bhojshala-Kamal Maula dispute
  • District collector appeals for peace, warns against rumours
  • Hindus claim site is Vagdevi temple, Muslims say it's Kamal Maula mosque
  • ASI survey report submitted after 25 days of hearings
3 min read

Security tightened in Dhar ahead of Madhya Pradesh HC verdict on Bhojshala-Kamal Maula dispute

Police tighten security in Dhar as MP High Court prepares to deliver verdict on Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex dispute. District collector appeals for peace.

"We appeal to all citizens to maintain peace in the district and not to pay attention to misleading information or rumours. - Rajiv Ranjan Meena"

Dhar, May 15

Police have tightened security in the Dhar district as the Madhya Pradesh High Court is expected to deliver a verdict on the dispute in connection with the Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque complex.

The legal conflict involves determining the religious character of the monument in the Dhar district.

Dhar District Collector Rajiv Ranjan Meena appealed to people to maintain the peace in the district and avoid spreading misleading information or rumours.

"A court decision is expected regarding the ancient structure protected by the ASI in Dhar district. We appeal to all citizens to maintain peace in the district and not to pay attention to misleading information or rumours. The district administration is monitoring such misinformation and rumours, and strict action will be taken against any untoward information received in this regard," he said in a video released by the Public Relations Office.

Later, speaking with ANI, he informed that additional police forces have been deployed to maintain peace in the areas.

"The executive magistrate and police force have been deployed, and we are keeping a watch on all the significant aspects," he said.

Hindus have argued that the Bhojshala complex, situated in Madhya Pradesh's Dhar district, is a temple dedicated to Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati), while Muslims believe that it is the site of the Kamal Maula mosque.

On May 12, the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court reserved its decision following final arguments. A division bench of Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla and Justice Alok Awasthi was hearing the matter regularly from April 6 and heard all the parties concerned, including petitioners, respondents, interveners and the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

"Since April 6, 2026, regular hearings have been taking place in the matter and the case has been heard for nearly 25 days. During this period, the court heard all parties, which include petitioners, respondents, interveners and the ASI for around 60 hours. After hearing all sides, the proceedings in the matter concluded today," said Shreesh Dubey, Lawyer of Bhoj Utsav Samiti.

He also said that the counsel representing the ASI responded to all the deficiencies pointed out in the ASI survey and the questions raised over it.

"The final argument in the matter has now concluded, and the next hearing will be for the judgement. I believe the verdict will come after the court vacation," Dubey said.

On the other hand, counsel for ASI, Aviral Khare, said that during the final argument, they responded to all the objections that were raised regarding the ASI survey report.

"We informed the court that the survey conducted at Bhojshala complex was carried out strictly in accordance with the court's directions and with complete impartiality and transparency. The ASI survey report runs into more than 2,000 pages and contains detailed descriptions of every aspect, including the methods used, the court's directions, how and where the survey was conducted, what findings were made at various locations, and the conclusions drawn by the ASI after analytical study and investigation," Khare said.

He added that final arguments from all parties were concluded on Tuesday and the court has reserved the matter for its decision. No further arguments will take place in the case now; only the judgement remains, which the court will pronounce in due course.

According to an arrangement in 2003, Hindus perform puja at the complex on Tuesdays from sunrise to sunset, while Muslims offer namaz on Fridays from 1 pm to 3 pm.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Honestly, I wish courts would settle these disputes faster—not leave everyone anxious. The history is so mixed here; it's not black and white. Both sides have genuine feelings, and we need unity, not division. I hope the ruling emphasizes coexistence instead of victory for one side. 🙌
R
Rahul R
I am a secular Indian and I believe both sides should sit together like they did in 2003. That arrangement was practical. ASI's survey should be transparent too—let the evidence speak, not emotions. Peace is more valuable than any monument. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
S
Sneha F
Why can't we just keep it as a shared heritage site? It's like many places in India where both communities pray together. The 2003 setup worked fine—breaking that would only create tension. I hope the HC considers harmony over division. 🕊️
V
Vikram M
I appreciate the district administration's proactive measures. Dhar is a sensitive zone, and strict action against misinformation is the need of the hour. But I worry—are we becoming too litigious over places of worship? Shouldn't we focus on education and development instead? Sometimes we fight over stones while our children lack schools. 🤔
A
Ananya R
As a history buff, I find the interwoven Hindu-Muslim past fascinating. But it's sad seeing communal coloring dominate. The ASI survey ran 2000+ pages—let's hope it's thorough. Courts must prioritize facts over sentiments. If there's strong evidence, accept it; if not, preserve the status quo. Let's not weaponize faith.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50