Key Points

Former Chief Election Commissioner OP Rawat has robustly defended the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision process for voter rolls. He dismissed concerns about the revision's legitimacy and criticized Rahul Gandhi's vote theft allegations. Rawat emphasized that SIR is a routine process essential for maintaining electoral integrity. His comments come amid ongoing controversy surrounding voter list updates, particularly in states like Bihar.

Key Points: OP Rawat Defends Election Commission Voter Roll Revision

  • Former CEC strongly backs Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
  • Rejects claims of vote manipulation by Election Commission
  • Challenges Rahul Gandhi's accusations of vote theft
  • Emphasizes routine nature of voter list purification
2 min read

Former CEC OP Rawat defends SIR, rejects doubts over elections mandate

Former CEC OP Rawat responds to election mandate criticism, supports Special Intensive Revision of voter lists

"Before every election, a revision is conducted, and it is the duty of the Election Commission to ensure it happens. - OP Rawat"

New Delhi, Sep 16

Former Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) O.P. Rawat on Tuesday strongly backed the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral roll carried out by the Election Commission and added that such an exercise “purifies” the voter list.

Speaking to IANS in Bhopal, Rawat said SIR is a routine and essential process undertaken by the Election Commission.

"Before every election, a revision is conducted, and it is the duty of the Election Commission to ensure it happens. The outcomes of these revisions have always been positive, as they purify the electoral rolls. Elections are then conducted on that basis," Rawat stated.

He clarified that the question of SIR being unnecessary had never arisen earlier.

"In the past, this was never made into an issue, as the need for questioning SIR was not felt," he said.

Responding to Rahul Gandhi's charge of vote theft under the Commission's watch, Rawat remarked, "That question should be directed to Rahul Gandhi himself."

He further underlined that the matter of SIR had no link with governments, past or present. "This is entirely between voters and the Election Commission," he said.

Rejecting doubts over the legitimacy of election mandates, Rawat asserted, "In all elections conducted so far, there can be no scope for doubt. Mistakes do happen, but whenever complaints are raised, the Election Commission promptly investigates."

When asked to comment on the presence of opposition-led governments in several states and the Congress's own gain in other states and in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, even as they question the credibility of the poll panel, he said, "These outcomes are not connected to the Election Commission and hence cannot be commented upon," Rawat concluded.

His comments come weeks after the issue of SIR in Bihar became a controversial issue, wherein the opposition blamed the poll panel for acting at the behest of the BJP, while the ruling party lauded the Commission for purifying the voter list.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
But why is SIR becoming controversial only now? If it's routine as Mr. Rawat says, why are opposition parties raising concerns? Something doesn't add up 🤔
A
Aman W
EC has always been impartial in our country. Political parties should stop questioning institutions when they don't get favorable results. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
N
Nisha Z
As someone who works in election duty, I can confirm that voter list purification is necessary. Many people move houses or pass away but their names remain. Regular updates are crucial for fair elections.
M
Michael C
While I appreciate the former CEC's perspective, transparency in the process is key. The EC should make the SIR process more visible to build public trust. Healthy skepticism is good for democracy.
S
Siddharth J
Rawat sahab is absolutely right! Election Commission is one institution that has maintained its credibility over decades. Political parties should respect constitutional bodies instead of questioning them after every loss.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50