Key Points

Tensions continue in Manipur as five tribal organizations offer support to government movement initiatives. The groups have jointly demanded a comprehensive approach to identifying immigrants and addressing ethnic complexities. They specifically challenge the use of 'Kuki' terminology and seek clarity in tribal identifications. The statement reflects ongoing efforts to restore peace and unity in the multi-ethnic state.

Key Points: Meitei Tribal Groups Back MHA's Manipur Movement Plan

  • Five tribal groups support Central government's free movement initiative
  • Organizations demand NRC-like immigrant identification process
  • Groups challenge 'Kuki' terminology as colonial construct
  • Seek deletion of ambiguous tribal category designations
3 min read

Five organisations offer support to MHA's efforts for ensuring free movement in Manipur

Five Manipur organizations support free movement efforts, demand NRC-like process and challenge 'Kuki' terminology

"We reaffirmed to safeguard the integrity, unity, and interests of Manipur - Joint Organizational Statement"

Imphal, May 4

Five organisations of Manipur's Meitei and Thadou tribal communities have offered support for the Ministry of Home Affairs' efforts to ensure free movement of all communities across Manipur, including the National Highways in both the valley and hills.

The five organisations, including Meitei Heritage Society and Thadou Inpi Manipur, also demanded firm action against any entities that block the free movement of all communities, as this is a constitutional right of all people and groups.

The Manipur government recommenced bus services on March 8 on four routes connecting five districts -- Imphal, Senapati, Kangpokpi, Bishnupur and Churachandpur. A large contingent of Central Armed Police Force (CAPF) personnel escorted the vehicles belonging to the government-owned Manipur State Transport Corporation (MSTC).

Though the buses were escorted by the CAPF, activists of the tribal organisations attacked the buses in different places, including in Kangpokpi district, leading to massive violence.

On March 8, at least 43 people, including 27 security personnel, were injured, and a protester identified as Lalgouthang Singsit was killed during the clashes in Kangpokpi and a few other districts as the Kuki-Zo tribal organisations protested against the resumption of the bus services between Imphal and the hill districts to alleviate public inconvenience and as an initiative to bring back normalcy in the state.

These organisations in a joint statement have also demanded to introduce an Assam-like National Register of Citizens (NRC) exercise to identify "illegal immigrants" through an updated process.

"We reaffirmed to safeguard the integrity, unity, and interests of Manipur as a multi-ethnic state. All parties also recognised the significant roles and contributions of the Thadou people for the protection of the collective interest of Manipur people and the state's integrity," the statement said.

The statement said that all parties jointly resolved to appeal to the competent authorities for the deletion of the "unconstitutional and ambiguous category Any Kuki Tribes (AKT)" from the Scheduled Tribes' list of Manipur.

This unclear designation is being exploited by illegal immigrants to obtain undeserved Scheduled Tribe (ST) status, propagating a deadly ideology of "Kuki Supremacism" that endangers communal unity in Manipur and poses a direct threat to national security, the statement said.

These organisations claimed that AKT was incorrectly added to the list of ST of Manipur in 2003 for political reasons, paving the way for the (mass) influx and legalisation of illegal immigrants.

"The parties agreed that the term 'Kuki' is neither an ethnic nor a cultural identity, but rather a faulty colonial construct that was later exploited by the power-hungry activists and vested interests with separatist and political ideologies to gain control over local indigenous communities and separate from Manipur. None of the 29 originally recognised tribes of Manipur identify as Kuki or AKT. Therefore, the use or reference to the term 'Kuki' must be discontinued in all academic, research, and official settings."

The statement said that to preserve and protect the authentic identities of the indigenous people of Manipur, the names of the recognised ST listed under Article 342 of the Constitution of India, each with its own distinct and independent ethnic identity, should be used only when referring to that specific tribe or community and not under any blanket, colonial, or imposed label.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

Here are 6 diverse Indian perspective comments for the article:
P
Priya K.
Good initiative by these organizations! Free movement is everyone's right. But the violence is worrying - we need dialogue, not attacks on buses. Hope the central forces can maintain peace 🤞 Manipur deserves normalcy after so much tension.
R
Rahul S.
The NRC demand makes sense - illegal immigration is a serious issue in Northeast. But deleting 'Kuki' from ST list needs careful consideration. Constitutional protections shouldn't be removed hastily. Govt must consult all stakeholders properly.
A
Anjali M.
As someone from Assam, I understand the Manipur situation. Ethnic identities are complex in Northeast. But attacking buses? That's unacceptable! All communities must work together for peace. Violence only hurts common people who just want to live normally.
S
Sanjay P.
The statement about 'Kuki' being a colonial construct is interesting. Many tribal identities in India were shaped by British policies. But after 75 years of independence, we can't keep blaming colonizers - we need to find our own solutions now.
N
Neha T.
Why is this issue not getting national attention? Northeast problems are always treated as 'local issues'. This affects India's unity! Central government must take stronger action - both for security and for development in Manipur.
V
Vikram J.
The bus service is a good confidence-building measure. Small steps like this can rebuild trust between communities. But security forces alone can't solve this - civil society and local leaders need to come forward for lasting peace.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50