Trump Signals Possible Military Action Against Iran, Says No Rush for Deal

US President Donald Trump signalled possible military action against Iran if negotiations fail, claiming US forces have hit 75% of targets. He insisted he is in "no rush" for a deal and wants an "everlasting" agreement. Trump said the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed to pressure Iran economically. He ruled out US use of nuclear weapons and highlighted a humanitarian intervention freeing eight Iranian women.

Key Points: Trump Warns Iran: Military Action Possible if Talks Fail

  • Trump signals possible military action if Iran talks fail
  • US has hit 75% of military targets
  • Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed
  • Trump rules out US use of nuclear weapons
2 min read

Trump signals possible military action against Iran, says no rush for deal

US President Donald Trump signals possible military action against Iran if negotiations fail, says he is in "no rush" for a deal after recent strikes.

Trump signals possible military action against Iran, says no rush for deal
"I could make a deal right now... but I want to have an everlasting - Donald Trump"

Washington, April 24

US President Donald Trump signalled that the United States could resume military action against Iran if negotiations fail, while insisting he is in "no rush" to conclude a deal after weeks of conflict.

"I could make a deal right now... but I want to have an everlasting," Trump said, adding that he would "finish it up militarily with the other 25 per cent of the targets" if Tehran refuses to agree.

The remarks come amid a fragile pause in hostilities following a US-led military campaign that Trump said had already "totally defeated their military" within weeks.

"We've hit about 75 per cent of our targets," he said, describing damage to Iran's naval, air and missile capabilities.

Trump said Washington retains "total control" over the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz and has kept it effectively closed to pressure Iran economically. "If we open the strait, that means they're going to make $500 million a day. I don't want them to make $500 million a day until they settle this thing," he said.

The President indicated that Tehran's leadership remains unstable following sustained strikes. "They don't even know who is leading the country... they're fighting like cats and dogs for who's going to control," he said.

Despite earlier suggesting the conflict could end within four to six weeks, Trump declined to set a timeline for a resolution. "I don't want to rush it... we have plenty of time," he said, arguing that Iran is under greater pressure due to economic strain and disrupted oil flows.

He acknowledged short-term economic impact on Americans, including fuel prices. "For a little while," he said when asked if costs would rise, but framed it as necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

"This is all about a nuclear weapon. They cannot have the nuclear bomb, and they're not going to have the nuclear bomb," Trump said.

At the same time, Trump ruled out the use of nuclear weapons by the United States. "No, I wouldn't use it. A nuclear weapon should never be allowed to be used by anybody," he said.

He also highlighted a humanitarian intervention, saying eight women facing execution in Iran would instead be released following a US appeal.

The remarks reflect a dual-track approach combining military pressure with conditional diplomacy, with Trump emphasising that any agreement must permanently block Iran's nuclear ambitions.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an American who has worked in India, I find Trump's approach alarming. He's essentially threatening to bomb Iran while claiming he's not rushing - that's not diplomacy, it's coercion. The part about keeping the Strait of Hormuz closed to squeeze Iran economically is practically an act of war against global shipping. India should definitely prepare contingency plans.
V
Vikram M
Honestly, I feel bad for the Iranian people caught in this power game. One superpower threatening to finish them off, leaders who can't even agree among themselves - it's the common man who suffers. Trump talking about saving eight women from execution is nice, but what about the thousands of civilians who might die if he bombs the remaining 25% targets? 😠
M
Michael C
From a security perspective, Trump's strategy makes some sense - combine overwhelming force with an offer to negotiate. The nuclear aspect is the key; no one wants a nuclear Iran. But his casual talk of "militarily finishing it" is reckless. India should use its diplomatic channels to urge restraint and push for a negotiated settlement. War benefits no one except arms dealers.
P
Priya S
Yaar, main toh kehti hoon ki yeh sab unnecessary tension hai. India should focus on diversifying energy sources and reducing dependence on Gulf oil. Also, we need to be ready to evacuate our citizens if things go bad. Trump is just playing games - ek din kehta hai deal karo, doosre din bomb dhamaka karo. Very unstable approach for such a sensitive region.
R
Robert G
The humanitarian angle

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50