Key Points

The Election Commission has taken strong action against inactive political parties. They've removed 474 registered unrecognized parties for not contesting any elections over six years. Another 359 parties are under scrutiny for failing to submit mandatory financial documents. This cleanup drive aims to maintain the integrity of India's political party system.

Key Points: ECI Delists 474 Political Parties for Not Contesting Elections

  • ECI removes 474 parties for not contesting any elections for six years
  • 359 more parties face action for failing to submit financial accounts
  • Total delistings reach 808 RUPPs in the last two months
  • Parties must explain their position in state-level hearings before final decision
2 min read

ECI delists 474 more political parties, action initiated against 359 others

Election Commission removes 474 political parties for failing to contest elections over six years, bringing total delistings to 808 in two months.

"ECI delisted 474 RUPPs on September 18, 2025 based on non-contestation in elections continuously for 6 years - Election Commission Press Note"

New Delhi, September 19

The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Friday delisted 474 Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs) for failing to contest any election over the past six years. With this, the total number of RUPPs removed from the official registry has risen to 808 in the last two months.

According to a press note issued by the ECI, the latest round of delistings follows a similar action taken on August 9, when 334 RUPPs were removed from the list of registered political parties for failing to contest elections for six consecutive years.

The Commission has also identified 359 more RUPPs from 23 States and Union Territories for not submitting their annual audited accounts for three consecutive financial years, 2021-22, 2022-23, and 2023-24. While these parties have contested elections, they failed to file mandatory election expenditure reports within the stipulated time, prompting the ECI to initiate action against them.

"In continuation, in the second phase, ECI delisted 474 RUPPs on September 18, 2025 based on non-contestation in elections conducted by ECI continuously for 6 years. Thus, 808 RUPPs have been delisted in the last 2 months," the press note reads.

"Political Parties (National/State/RUPPs) in the country are registered with the Election Commission of India (ECI) under the provisions of Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act 1951. Under provisions of the Act, any association once registered as a political party gets certain privileges and advantages, such as a symbol, tax exemptions, among others. Guidelines for registration of Political Parties mention that if the party does not contest elections continuously for 6 years, the party shall be taken off the list of registered parties," the press note reads.

To ensure due process, the Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) of the concerned States and UTs have been directed to issue show-cause notices to these parties. The ECI has said that these parties will be given a chance to explain their position in hearings conducted by the respective CEOs before a final decision is made on their delisting.

"The ECI takes the final decision on the delisting of any RUPP based on the reports of the CEOs," the press note reads.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Finally some action against paper parties. Many of these were just formed to claim tax exemptions and never intended to contest elections. Democracy needs genuine participants only.
M
Michael C
While I support the cleanup, I hope the ECI ensures proper due process. Some of these might be genuine small parties struggling with compliance. The hearing process is important.
A
Ananya R
Six years is more than enough time to contest at least one election. If they haven't participated, they don't deserve to be called political parties. Well done ECI! 🇮🇳
S
Sarah B
The financial accountability part is crucial too. Parties not submitting audited accounts for three consecutive years raises serious questions about transparency and potential misuse of funds.
V
Vikram M
This should have been done long back. So many parties registered just for namesake and enjoying benefits without any contribution to political process. Better late than never!
K
Karthik V
Hope this sets a precedent for regular monitoring. Political parties should be accountable and active participants in democracy, not just exist on paper for benefits.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50