Sat, 13 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Apr 2, 2025 · 19:20
Jammu And Kashmir News Updated Apr 2, 2025

'Disempowering Muslims': J&K political parties oppose Waqf (Amendment) Bill

J&K political leaders, including Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti, have strongly opposed the Waqf Amendment Bill, calling it discriminatory against Muslims. Abdullah stated his party will oppose the bill in Parliament, while Mufti accused the BJP of systematic disempowerment of Muslims. Sajad Lone termed the bill an interference in religious affairs, contrasting BJP's claim of transparency-driven reforms. The debate highlights deepening political and religious divides in the region.

Srinagar, April 2

All political parties of J&K, except the BJP, opposed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, saying that the Bill is intended to disempower Muslims and only target one religion.

J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah said that the Bill is not acceptable to his party.

"Only one religion is being targeted. Every religion has its institutions, and every religion has a charitable wing. For Muslims, it is the Waqf," said the Chief Minister.

Omar Abdullah said that targeting the Waqf is very unfortunate, adding that it is up to Parliament now to stop amendments in the Bill.

"NC cannot support this Bill. Our MPs will strongly oppose it," said the Chief Minister.

Former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti also opposed the bill, saying that she has no hope from the BJP given the treatment meted out to Muslims in the country.

"I don't have any hope from the BJP. We have seen how Muslims are being lynched and mosques demolished in the last 11 years," she said.

The former Chief Minister added that the Bill is intended to disempower Muslims, adding that she hoped that the Hindu brethren would step forward to stop it.

"India is a nation of Gandhi, and it should be run as per the Constitution. The secular forces should intervene to prevent the country from becoming another Myanmar. If people decide to remain as mute spectators, then nobody can stop the chaos in the country," said the former Chief Minister.

People's Conference chairman, Sajad Gani Lone, also opposed the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, calling it blatant interference in the religious affairs of Muslims.

"The proposed amendment by Parliament is a blatant interference in our faith aimed at divesting the rightful custodians of their authority. This is yet another rightwing trespassing," the People's Conference chairman wrote on X.

Meanwhile, BJP leader Darakhshan Andrabi welcomed the amendments, saying they would be beneficial for the poor from the community.

"How does Waqf have so many properties, but still, Muslim brothers are poor? Waqf has thousands of kanals of land, but despite that, a majority of Muslims are homeless and landless. The Prime Minister is thinking about these issues so that the Muslim community does not remain poor and gets all facilities," she said.

Darakhshan Andrabi heads the J&K Waqf Board.

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill was tabled in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday by Union Minister for Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju.

As per the government, the Bill is aimed at improving the functioning and ensuring transparency and technology-driven management of Waqf properties in the country.

Opposition parties in the Lok Sabha have called the Bill "unconstitutional" and against the "interest" of the Muslim community.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Ayesha K.

This is deeply concerning. Why single out Waqf properties when other religious institutions operate freely? The timing seems suspicious too. 🤔

Rajiv P.

While I support transparency in all religious institutions, the government should clarify why this amendment is necessary now. The optics don't look good.

Sameer A.

As a Muslim, I welcome reforms if they genuinely help the community. But the political rhetoric from both sides is making it hard to understand the actual provisions.

Priya M.

The article presents one-sided views. Where are the details about what exactly the amendment proposes? Journalism should be more balanced. 👎

Imran H.

Waqf properties have been mismanaged for decades. Maybe some oversight is needed, but it should be done carefully without hurting religious sentiments.

Neha T.

The polarization is heartbreaking. Can't we have a civil discussion about governance reforms without making it about religion vs religion? 😔

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked