Kerala's Education Battle: Why PM SHRI Scheme Splits Left Front Allies

The CPI has strongly opposed Kerala's move to accept PM SHRI scheme funds. Party secretary Binoy Viswam warned this would force NEP implementation through backdoor means. This creates tension within the LDF coalition as Education Minister Sivankutty had earlier declared the state would proceed with the scheme. The disagreement highlights growing differences between CPI and CPI(M) over education policy direction.

Key Points: CPI Opposes PM SHRI Scheme Citing NEP Implementation Concerns

  • CPI warns PM SHRI funds would compel NEP implementation in Kerala
  • Education Minister Sivankutty's declaration sparks intra-coalition conflict
  • CPI ministers raise PM SHRI issue in cabinet meeting without response
  • Opposition leader Satheesan questions CPI's humiliation within LDF alliance
2 min read

Differences surface in LDF over Vijayan govt's move on PM SHRI

CPI state secretary Binoy Viswam warns against PM SHRI scheme, calling it backdoor route for NEP implementation amid LDF differences in Kerala government.

"PM SHRI is a backdoor route to enforce NEP - Binoy Viswam"

Thiruvananthapuram, Oct 22

CPI state secretary Binoy Viswam on Wednesday reiterated that the National Education Policy (NEP) will not be implemented in Kerala.

CPI is the second biggest ally in the ruling CPI(M)- led Left Front government in Kerala.

He also warned that accepting funds under the PM SHRI Scheme would effectively compel the state to implement the NEP.

Calling PM SHRI a “backdoor route” to enforce the NEP, Viswam said the funds and the policy are “closely linked”.

He pointed out that M.A. Baby, the general secretary of the CPI(M), has already clarified the party’s position.

Viswam's statement came as a sharp response to the CPI(M) legislator and State Education Minister V. Sivankutty’s earlier declaration that the state would go ahead with the PM SHRI scheme.

Viswam spoke to the media soon after he called the four state CPI cabinet ministers to his house ahead of the weekly cabinet meeting and held discussions with them.

At the cabinet meeting, the CPI ministers raised the issue of PM SHRI, and it is reliably learnt that neither Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan nor Sivankutty spoke about it.

The CPI has also expressed its displeasure at what it sees as a unilateral decision by CPI(M) without proper consultation within the Left Democratic Front to have announced that they will go ahead with PM SHRI.

Adding a new dimension to the debate, V.D. Satheesan, the Leader of Opposition, stated that there is “nothing wrong in accepting central funds”, but warned against allowing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)’s “communal agenda” to take root through such schemes.

“This money does not come from the Prime Minister’s home”, and added that the PM SHRI scheme had already been implemented in states ruled by the Indian National Congress, but it was done before the party came to power there. We all heard the curt response of the CPI(M) state secretary M.V. Govindan when he asked, ‘Who is this CPI?’. It’s a shame that a party like the CPI is being humiliated by the CPI(M), and it’s high time that they come out of the LDF,” said Satheesan.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
This internal conflict shows the Left Front is crumbling. How can they govern if they can't even agree on basic policy matters? The people of Kerala deserve better leadership.
A
Arjun K
Satheesan makes a valid point - the funds belong to the nation, not to any political party. But we must be cautious about hidden agendas in central schemes. Kerala's education model is unique and worth protecting.
M
Meera T
As a teacher, I'm concerned about NEP implementation. Kerala's education system has produced excellent results without central interference. Why fix what isn't broken? 🤔
S
Sarah B
While I respect Kerala's educational achievements, some central funds could help improve infrastructure in government schools. There should be a middle path that preserves state autonomy while benefiting students.
V
Vikram M
The way CPI(M) is treating their alliance partner is shameful. "Who is this CPI?" - such arrogance! This shows the true colors of dominant partners in coalitions. Alliance dharma should be respected.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50