Key Points

Former Congress leader P. Chidambaram's recent revelations about the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks have stirred significant controversy within the party. Rashid Alvi has strongly criticized Chidambaram, suggesting his statements inadvertently strengthen the BJP's political positioning. The core of the dispute centers on Chidambaram's disclosure about international pressure, particularly from the United States, which influenced India's diplomatic response. These revelations have exposed internal tensions within the Congress party and reignited debates about India's strategic decision-making during a critical moment in its recent history.

Key Points: Chidambaram Mumbai Attacks US Pressure Sparks Congress Clash

  • Chidambaram revealed US pressure influenced India's restrained response to Mumbai attacks
  • Rashid Alvi accuses Chidambaram of weakening Congress party
  • Diplomatic channels were prioritized over military retaliation
  • Condoleezza Rice personally intervened to prevent potential war
3 min read

Chidambaram wants to strengthen BJP: Rashid Alvi over US pressure remarks

Rashid Alvi criticizes P. Chidambaram's revelations about 26/11 response, claiming his statements benefit BJP's political narrative.

"What is the point of making such a statement after 16 years? - Rashid Alvi"

New Delhi, Oct 1

Former Congress Rajya Sabha member Rashid Alvi on Wednesday came down heavily on ex-Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram, accusing him of strengthening the BJP by making statements that target the previous UPA-led government.

The criticism follows Chidambaram's recent remarks about the decision-making process within the government in the aftermath of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks.

During a recent interview, he disclosed that he had favoured a retaliatory strike against Pakistan at the time but was asked to rely on diplomatic channels instead. Chidambaram revealed how international pressure, particularly from the United States, played a major role in shaping India's restrained response to the deadly attacks.

Reacting sharply, Alvi said, "Chidambaram is saying that the government was working under US pressure? Such a statement will only benefit the BJP. Why is Chidambaram making this claim after 16 years?"

He further asserted that if Chidambaram had disagreed with the decision-making back then, he should have resigned from his position.

"If he had disagreed at that time, he should have resigned. Many within the Congress want to weaken the party. It is like a house catching fire because of its own lamp," Alvi said.

Expressing doubt over Chidambaram's intention, the former Congress MP questioned the timing of his statement.

"What is the point of making such a statement after 16 years? Why does he want to prove that the UPA government was working under American pressure? This means he wants to strengthen the BJP," Alvi said.

Congress MP Tariq Anwar, however, took a softer line, expressing disbelief over the claims attributed to the former Union Minister. "I don't think Chidambaram can make such a statement," Anwar said.

In the interview, Chidambaram acknowledged that the idea of retaliation had indeed crossed his mind.

"It did cross my mind that we should do some act of retribution. I did discuss it with the Prime Minister and other people who mattered. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh discussed this matter when the attack was going on, I can surmise. And the conclusion was largely influenced by the MEA and the IFS that we should not physically react to the situation, but we should employ diplomatic means," he said.

According to Chidambaram, the decision to exercise restraint was taken under mounting international pressure.

"The conclusion was reached amid pressure from the world that was descending upon Delhi to tell us that don't start a war," he said.

He recalled that then US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had flown to Delhi to meet him and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, urging India to avoid any military retaliation.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who lost family in 26/11, I appreciate knowing the truth. We deserved a stronger response against terrorism. Better late than never to know what really happened in those crucial days.
P
Priya S
Rashid Alvi has a point about the timing. But we should focus on the bigger issue - should India ever bow to foreign pressure on matters of national security? This is a serious question for all political parties.
A
Arjun K
The real question is why our government had to listen to US pressure? 26/11 was an attack on Indian soil and we should have taken whatever action necessary. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
M
Michael C
While I understand the frustration about timing, transparency in governance is important. Citizens have the right to know how critical decisions were made, even if it's years later.
K
Kavya N
This internal fighting within Congress is exactly why people are losing faith in opposition parties. Instead of blaming each other, they should present a united front and better alternatives to the public.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50