Key Points

The Indian government has strategically revised flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) requirements for thermal power plants based on scientific studies. Mandatory installations will now focus on plants near large urban centers, potentially reducing electricity costs for consumers. Multiple research institutions supported this targeted approach, highlighting India's unique environmental conditions. The decision represents a nuanced balance between environmental protection and economic considerations.

Key Points: Govt Eases FGD Norms Power Plants Electricity Costs Down

  • - Mandatory FGD installations now limited to plants near million-plus population cities
3 min read

Centre eases FGD norms for power plants, electricity costs to come down

India relaxes mandatory flue gas desulphurisation rules for thermal power plants, potentially reducing electricity costs by 25-30 paise per unit.

Centre eases FGD norms for power plants, electricity costs to come down
"This is a rational, science-based move that avoids unnecessary costs - Senior Public Sector Utility Executive"

New Delhi, July 13

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has relaxed the requirement for mandatory installation of flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) systems at most coal-based thermal power plants, marking a move towards differentiated compliance based on proximity to urban populations and the sulphur content of the coal used.

The new framework, finalised after extensive deliberations and multiple independent studies, will restrict FGD mandates only to plants located within 10 kilometres of cities with a population exceeding one million.

Plants in critically polluted areas or non-attainment cities will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. All other plants - accounting for nearly 79 per cent of India's thermal power capacity - are now exempted from mandatory FGD installation.

Crucially, the relaxed norms are expected to bring down the cost of electricity by 25 to 30 paise per unit. That benefit, say experts, will ultimately flow to consumers. In a high-demand, cost-sensitive economy, the impact could be significant, helping state discoms contain tariffs and reducing the subsidy burden on governments.

The financial burden of mandatory FGD retrofitting was previously estimated at over Rs 2.5 lakh crore, or Rs 1.2 crore per MW, with installation timelines of up to 45 days per unit. Several power producers had warned that this would not only raise costs but also jeopardise grid stability during peak seasons.

The decision follows a series of studies by IIT Delhi, CSIR-NEERI and the National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), which found that ambient sulphur dioxide levels in most parts of India are well within the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Measurements across multiple cities showed sulphur dioxide levels ranging between 3 and 20 µg/m³, significantly below the NAAQS threshold of 80 µg/m³.

The studies also questioned the environmental and economic efficacy of a universal FGD mandate in the Indian context. Indian coal typically has a sulphur content of less than 0.5 per cent, and due to high stack heights and favourable meteorological conditions, dispersion of sulphur dioxide is efficient.

The NIAS study warned that retrofitting FGDs nationwide would add an estimated 69 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions between 2025 and 2030 due to increased limestone mining, transportation, and power consumption.

FGDs are useful in places with high sulphur coal (like in China or the US), high ambient sulphur dioxide levels and dense urban proximity. Studies show that India does not face these problems at scale, making universal FGD rollout unnecessary, expensive and counterproductive.

Industry executives welcomed the decision. "This is a rational, science-based move that avoids unnecessary costs and focuses regulation where it is most needed," said a senior executive at a leading public sector utility. "More importantly, it will help keep electricity affordable."

Officials stressed that the government remains committed to environmental protection, but with a smarter lens. "This is not a rollback. It is a recalibration based on evidence," a senior official said.

"Our approach is now targeted, efficient and climate-conscious," the official added.

An affidavit incorporating these findings will be submitted shortly to the Supreme Court in the MC Mehta vs Union of India case, where FGD enforcement timelines have been under judicial scrutiny.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Ananya R
While cost reduction is good, I'm concerned about long-term environmental impact. Delhi's air is already terrible 😷 Shouldn't we be more proactive rather than waiting for pollution to reach dangerous levels?
V
Vikram M
Good decision based on scientific studies. Our coal quality is different from China/US. Why waste money on unnecessary equipment? Focus should be on renewable energy transition instead.
P
Priya S
25-30 paise reduction per unit may seem small but will make big difference for small businesses! Our bakery spends ₹8000/month on electricity - this means ₹2000 savings. Every rupee counts in this economy 🙏
S
Sarah B
As someone who recently moved to Mumbai, I appreciate the balanced approach. The city air is bad enough already - glad plants near urban areas still need these systems. Health should come first in crowded cities.
K
Karthik V
Smart move by the government. We need to stop applying one-size-fits-all solutions. The studies show our situation is different - why spend ₹2.5 lakh crore unnecessarily? Better to invest that money in solar/wind projects.
M
Meera T
I hope they monitor air quality closely. If SO2 levels start rising in future, they should be ready to reverse this decision. Environment ministry must stay vigilant 👀

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50