Key Points

Sri Lanka's cricket team suffered another dramatic loss against India in the Asia Cup Super Fours. Head coach Sanath Jayasuriya acknowledged the team's near-miss, highlighting Pathum Nissanka's impressive century and the fine margins that separated victory from defeat. Despite the disappointment, Jayasuriya remains optimistic about the team's potential and ability to learn from these experiences. The loss continues a pattern of narrow defeats that have kept Sri Lanka from reaching the tournament's final stages.

Key Points: Jayasuriya Rues Sri Lanka's Narrow Asia Cup Loss to India

  • Nissanka's brilliant 107 nearly secured victory
  • Sri Lanka missed crucial third run in final over
  • Team struggled with pitch adaptability
  • Repeated Super Over collapses against India
3 min read

Asia Cup: Jayasuriya rues missed chances after Sri Lanka stumble again in Super Over against India

Sri Lanka's head coach reflects on heartbreaking Super Over defeat, praising team's potential despite missed opportunities against India

"No captain or coach wants to go to a Super Over. - Sanath Jayasuriya"

Dubai, Sep 27

Sri Lanka head coach Sanath Jayasuriya admitted his disbelief after his side once again squandered a winning position against India, this time in their Asia Cup Super Fours clash in Dubai on Friday.

The defeat, eerily reminiscent of last year's collapse in Pallekele, saw Sri Lanka fall short in a Super Over despite centurion Pathum Nissanka's heroics.

"I would've preferred to finish games in normal time," Jayasuriya said at the post-match press conference. "No captain or coach wants to go to a Super Over. Unfortunately, Dasun missed completing the third run. But no, there's no mental block against India. Our batting line-up is strong, and we've given them confidence. Chasing 200 (203) is never easy, but we almost did it, which shows the quality we have."

Sri Lanka needed just 12 off the last over with six wickets in hand and Nissanka on 107. But Nissanka fell first ball, and while Dasun Shanaka's desperate dive completed only a second run off the last delivery, it left the scores tied at 202. A chance to sneak a third was missed, forcing a Super Over, where Sri Lanka faltered again.

The loss came despite a sublime innings from Nissanka, who stroked 107 off 58 balls, leading a 127-run stand with Kusal Perera (58 off 32). Jayasuriya revealed Nissanka had been carrying niggles throughout the tournament. "When you're chasing 202 (203), you have to keep finding boundaries," he said. "Their partnership was the key. The momentum shifted when we started losing wickets. That's natural in a chase because someone has to take risks. Sadly, Pathum got out at the wrong time, and later on, the ball began to turn more. Still, it was a very good game of cricket."

The coach heaped praise on Perera's role too. "Kusal is one of the best players of spin in our team. He played that role well again, though I'd have liked him to bat longer. Both took calculated risks, and when they wanted boundaries, they executed them. Pathum also had a bit of a hamstring issue recently but still gave 100% for the team, which shows his commitment."

For Jayasuriya, the loss triggered memories of July 2024 in Pallekele, when Sri Lanka needed just nine from two overs against India with six wickets left but collapsed into a Super Over defeat after scoring only one run. Yet he brushed off talk of a mental block.

Sri Lanka will return home without a win in the Super Fours, having earlier lost to Bangladesh and Pakistan, a disappointing outcome after progressing unbeaten through a tough group. Jayasuriya pointed to poor adaptability as the reason. "In T20 cricket, assessing conditions quickly is everything. In Abu Dhabi, for example, the first-round pitches had pace and bounce, but in the second round, things changed, and we were too slow to adapt. That cost us. The disappointment was the Bangladesh match in the Super Four -- 168 on that pitch was a good score, but we didn't bowl well enough to defend it. Against Pakistan, we didn't assess the conditions [in Abu Dhabi] quickly enough, and were late to adapt."

Despite the setbacks, the coach expressed optimism. "Today, India played very well to get over 200. Our boys showed they're capable of chasing that, but again we just fell short. Apart from that Bangladesh game, I'm fairly satisfied, though disappointed not to reach the final. We have the batting and bowling quality. The key is to execute plans according to conditions and opposition. If we do that consistently, this team can go very far."

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Sri Lanka really needs to work on their finishing skills. This is becoming a pattern against India - they play well but collapse at the end. Dasun Shanaka should have taken responsibility in that last over.
M
Michael C
As a cricket fan living in Dubai, this was one of the best matches I've seen live! The atmosphere was electric. Both teams gave their all. India's death bowling made the difference in the end.
A
Ananya R
Jayasuriya is right about the mental block. Sri Lanka players get nervous against India in crunch situations. They need a sports psychologist maybe? Otherwise they have talented players.
S
Sarah B
Pathum Nissanka deserved to be on the winning side after that brilliant century. Playing with injury and still performing - true sportsmanship! 👏 Hope Sri Lanka learns from these close losses.
V
Vikram M
Honestly, India got lucky here. 12 needed off 6 with 6 wickets in hand should have been easy for any international team. Sri Lanka's middle order needs to step up in pressure situations.
K
Kavya N
The real problem is Sri Lanka's inability to adapt to different pitches quickly. Jayasuriya pointed this out correctly. In modern T20 cricket, you need to be flexible.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50