Sun, 28 Jun 2026 · LIVE
Updated Nov 27, 2025 · 12:08
Computer News Updated Nov 27, 2025

Google's South Korea Concession: Why YouTube Premium Lite Reveals Antitrust Pressure

Google is launching a cheaper YouTube Premium Lite subscription in South Korea without the music streaming component. This comes after months of investigation by the country's antitrust watchdog into alleged anti-competitive practices. The new video-only service will be priced significantly lower than the full YouTube Premium package. Google agreed to this corrective measure through a consent decision process to resolve the FTC's concerns about consumer choice restrictions.

Antitrust probe: Google to launch YouTube Premium without music service in S. Korea

Seoul, Nov 27

Google will launch a cheaper version of its YouTube Premium subscription without its music streaming component in South Korea, the country's antitrust watchdog said on Thursday, following months of investigation into alleged anti-competitive practices.

The move is part of a self-proposed corrective measure agreed upon by the U.S. tech giant and the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), which has been probing the company over suspicions that bundling YouTube Music with YouTube Premium violated fair trade rules, reports Yonhap news agency.

Under the decision, Google will introduce YouTube Premium Lite, a video-only subscription that includes advertisement removal, background playback and offline viewing services, the FTC said. Existing YouTube Premium and YouTube Music Premium subscriptions will continue to be available.

YouTube Premium Lite is expected to be priced at 8,500 won (US$5.80) per month for Android and web users and 10,900 won per month for iOS users, the FTC said. YouTube Premium currently costs 14,900 won, while YouTube Music is offered separately for 11,990 won per month.

The new service, currently available in 19 other countries, will be launched in South Korea at the lowest relative price compared with other major markets, officials said.

"The pricing will remain in effect for at least one year and, even if adjustments are made, will stay lower than prices in major overseas markets for up to four years," an FTC official said.

Google is required to launch YouTube Premium Lite within 90 days of receiving the consent decision.

In July last year, the FTC issued a report equivalent to a formal prosecution complaint, accusing Google Korea of unfairly bundling YouTube Music with YouTube Premium, thereby restricting consumer choice and abusing its market dominance.

The regulator claims Google's practice effectively forced consumers to subscribe to both services, limiting options for those who may have only wanted access to ad-free video streaming.

Rather than pursuing a prolonged legal battle, Google has submitted a corrective action plan under the FTC's procedure known as a "consent decision." The mechanism allows the FTC to suspend its investigation if the company voluntarily proposes measures that address the alleged consumer harm.

Some critics have asked whether citing the consent decision without determining the legality of Google's alleged violations amounts to giving the company a free pass.

The FTC said the consent decision system is widely used internationally as a way to quickly and effectively restore competitive conditions and take necessary corrective measures.

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

Finally some consumer-friendly action! I've been wanting just the ad-free YouTube experience without paying for music I don't use. South Korean regulators are setting a good example for other countries. 👏

Arjun K

While this is positive, I'm concerned about the different pricing for iOS users. Why should Apple users pay more for the same service? This seems unfair. 🤔

Sarah B

As someone who uses both services, I prefer the bundle. But choice is always better. More options mean more people can get what they actually need. Good decision by the regulators.

Vikram M

Big tech companies often force unnecessary bundles on consumers. Glad to see South Korea taking a stand. Indian regulators should also be more proactive about such practices. 💪

Michael C

The consent decision approach seems practical - avoids lengthy legal battles while achieving consumer benefits. Sometimes compromise works better than confrontation in regulatory matters.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked