Key Points

Union Home Minister Amit Shah has accused retired Supreme Court Justice B Sudershan Reddy of supporting Naxalism through his judicial pronouncements. Shah specifically targeted Justice Reddy's 2011 Salwa Judum judgment that declared state-sponsored tribal militias unconstitutional. The Home Minister claimed this verdict weakened counterinsurgency efforts and extended Maoist extremism. These remarks come as Justice Reddy, nominated by the INDIA bloc, faces the BJP's candidate in the upcoming Vice Presidential election.

Key Points: Amit Shah Accuses INDIA Bloc VP Nominee Sudershan Reddy of Supporting Naxalism

  • Shah cites 2011 Salwa Judum verdict that disbanded state-backed tribal militias
  • Claims judgment indirectly strengthened Maoist extremists in Chhattisgarh
  • Accuses Congress of nominating a Naxalism supporter due to Left pressure
  • Links Kerala's extremist issues to the Opposition's VP candidate choice
2 min read

Amit Shah accuses INDIA bloc's VP nominee of supporting 'Maoism'

Union Home Minister Amit Shah alleges former SC Judge B Sudershan Reddy's Salwa Judum judgment helped Naxalism, linking it to INDIA bloc's VP nomination.

"Sudershan Reddy is the person who helped Naxalism. He gave the Salwa Judum judgment. If that judgment had not been given, Naxal terrorism would have ended by 2020 - Amit Shah"

Kochi, Aug 22

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Friday accused retired Supreme Court Judge B Sudershan Reddy, the INDIA bloc's nominee for the upcoming Vice Presidential election, of having supported Naxalism (Maoism) through his judicial pronouncements.

Speaking at a public event here, HM Shah referred to Justice Reddy's 2011 Salwa Judum judgement, which had declared as "illegal" and "unconstitutional" the state-sponsored arming of young tribal men as special police officers in Chhattisgarh.

The ruling ordered that such militias be disbanded, stressing that the state must address the root causes of the insurgency through lawful governance rather than vigilante groups.

Revisiting that verdict, the Home Minister alleged the judgement indirectly strengthened Maoist extremists and curtailed the state's ability to counter insurgency.

"Sudershan Reddy is the person who helped Naxalism. He gave the Salwa Judum judgment. If that judgment had not been given, Naxal terrorism would have ended by 2020," the Home Minister said.

He further claimed the Congress, under pressure from its Left allies, had nominated a candidate "who supported Naxalism with a forum like the Supreme Court".

HM Shah also pointed out that Kerala, which will face Assembly elections next year, has "suffered" from Left-wing extremist activities, and urged voters to recognise the implications of the Opposition's choice.

The Vice President election is scheduled for September 9.

Justice Reddy, nominated by the Congress-led INDIA bloc, will face the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance's candidate, Maharashtra Governor C P Radhakrishnan.

The election follows the resignation of incumbent Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar last month.

Justice Reddy, who retired from the Supreme Court in 2011, was part of several significant constitutional benches during his tenure.

His Salwa Judum ruling remains one of the most debated judgments on state policy towards Maoist insurgency, earning both praise for upholding constitutional rights and criticism for curbing state-led counterinsurgency initiatives.

With campaign rhetoric sharpening, HM Shah's remarks are seen as part of the BJP's effort to frame the election as a larger ideological battle between national security and civil rights approaches to internal conflict.

Earlier in the day, the Union Home Minister had a closed-door meeting with all the top leaders of the Kerala unit of the BJP and urged them to ensure that they target 25 per cent vote share at the local body polls likely to be held in December.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Justice Reddy's judgment protected tribal rights and prevented state-sponsored violence. Calling this "supporting Naxalism" is misleading. The Supreme Court's role is to uphold constitutional values, not endorse vigilante groups. 🇮🇳
M
Michael C
As someone who has studied Indian judiciary, I find this politicization of judicial decisions concerning. The Salwa Judum judgment was about constitutional principles, not political ideology. Both sides should debate policies rather than questioning a former judge's patriotism.
A
Ananya R
The Home Minister is right to point out the security implications. Kerala has suffered enough from extremist activities. We need leaders who prioritize national security over political alliances. BJP's stance makes sense for our safety.
S
Siddharth J
This is typical election rhetoric. The Vice President position should be above such political mudslinging. Justice Reddy served the Supreme Court with distinction. Let's focus on qualifications rather than creating unnecessary controversies.
K
Kavya N
Arming tribal youth was never the solution. Justice Reddy's judgment protected innocent people from being caught in crossfire. Addressing root causes through development is the right approach. Proud of his constitutional stance! 👏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50