11 parties urge Manipur Guv to defer delimitation process till 2026

IANS May 13, 2025 160 views

Political parties in Manipur have united to challenge the proposed electoral boundary redrawing, citing concerns about outdated census data and ongoing ethnic tensions. The delegation of 11 parties, including national and regional groups, met with Manipur's Governor to request deferring the delimitation process until 2026. Their primary argument centers on the potential for social disruption and inaccurate population representation from the 2001 census. The Supreme Court's directive to complete the delimitation in northeastern states within three months adds complexity to their request.

"If any delimitation exercise is taken up in Manipur, there would be real disturbances of public order" - 11 Parties Memorandum
Imphal, May 12: Leaders of 11 political parties, comprising national and local, on Monday urged Manipur Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla to take up the matter with the Centre to defer the delimitation process in the state till 2026.

Key Points

1

11 parties oppose delimitation based on 2001 census data

2

Supreme Court mandates completion within three months

3

Ethnic conflict complicates boundary redrawing

A Raj Bhavan official said that during the discussions, party representatives submitted a memorandum and voiced their concerns about the possible delimitation exercise.

A spokesman of the delegation of the 11 political parties said that re-demarcation of electoral boundaries must be conducted on the basis of a correct Census and it should be deferred till 2026, when the delimitation process would be undertaken in the entire country with the new census figures.

The 11 parties’ meeting follows a recent directive from the Supreme Court, which has instructed the completion of the pending delimitation exercise in the northeastern states of Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur and Assam within the next three months.

The memorandum of the 11 parties said: “Considering the prevailing ethnic conflict in Manipur (since May 2023), it is not possible to carry out delimitation. If any delimitation exercise is taken up in Manipur, there would be real disturbances of public order. As per the 2001 census data, abnormal growth of population was found in certain hill districts. There is every likelihood of the eruption of further conflict between the people in the hills and the valley regions.”

The parties whose leaders met the Governor on Monday, include, National People’s Party (NPP), Janata Dal (United), Communist Party of India (Marxist), Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), Nationalist Congress Party (NCP-SP), Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP), Republican Party of India (Athawale (RPI-A), Shiv Sena (UBT), Manipur People's Party (MPP) and Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP).

Most political parties in Manipur opposed any possible delimitation exercises in the state based on the 2001 census report, and they demanded a thorough rectification of the census data before re-demarcation of electoral boundaries.

Senior BJP leader Kh Ibomcha said that his party would soon constitute a 13-member committee to look into the issues of the delimitation of electoral boundaries exercise in the state. Ibomcha, who is also an MLA of the Lamlai Assembly constituency, said that the BJP also reiterated that it has no objection to the delimitation of constituencies in the state if it is based on an authentic census.

The opposition Congress earlier also opposed any possible delimitation exercises in the state based on the 2001 census report, demanding a thorough rectification of the census data before re-demarcation of electoral boundaries.

Congress Vice-President in Manipur, Hareshwar Goswami, had said that the issue of inaccuracy in the 2001 census arose after detecting a disproportionate growth rate of people in nine subdivisions across three districts in the state. The Congress leader said that the party supports delimitation, but it must be based on a correct census without any errors. Everyone knows that the 2001 census had many irregularities, he claimed.

“Most people, political parties, civil societies and social organisations in Manipur are not opposed to the delimitation process. But they are asking for it to be conducted based on a genuine Census,” Goswami pointed out. He said that the Congress’ stance on re-demarcation of electoral boundaries is that the exercise must be conducted on the basis of a correct Census and hence the delimitation must be deferred till 2026.

Reader Comments

P
Priya K.
This is a very sensitive issue for Manipur. With the ongoing ethnic tensions, any hasty delimitation based on old census data could worsen the situation. The government should listen to these 11 parties and wait for 2026 census. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
R
Rahul S.
Interesting to see parties across the spectrum coming together on this issue. Manipur needs stability first. The abnormal population growth mentioned in 2001 census needs proper investigation before any boundary changes. #NorthEastMatters
A
Anjali M.
Why is there so much rush for delimitation now? The Supreme Court directive should consider ground realities. Manipur is still recovering from violence - let's not add fuel to fire. Accurate census data is basic requirement for fair representation.
S
Sanjay T.
As someone from Northeast (Assam), I understand these concerns. Hill vs valley tensions are complex. The 2001 census irregularities must be addressed first. Good to see BJP also supporting proper census before delimitation. Hope Centre listens 🤞
M
Meena P.
The mention of "abnormal population growth" in certain districts is concerning. This needs proper inquiry - could be due to migration or documentation issues. Either way, current situation is too volatile for boundary changes. Safety first!
K
Karthik R.
While I support delimitation for fair representation, timing is everything. With so many parties including AAP, NCP, CPI(M) agreeing on this, the government should take note. Unity among rivals shows how serious the issue is for Manipur.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Your email won't be published


Disclaimer: Comments here reflect the author's views alone. Insulting or using offensive language against individuals, communities, religion, or the nation is illegal.

Tags: