Trump Says Greenland Deal "Pretty Well Agreed To" in National Security Push

US President Donald Trump announced that negotiations regarding Greenland are underway and close to an agreement, emphasizing the deal's importance for national security. The talks follow a meeting between Danish, Greenlandic, and US officials that established a working group after earlier tensions. Trump had previously threatened tariffs on European allies to pressure Denmark over Greenland but later stepped back from those threats. He clarified the US would not use military force to acquire the territory, pointing to a framework deal discussed with NATO's leader.

Key Points: Trump: Greenland Negotiations Close to Agreement

  • Trump says Greenland talks are advancing
  • Deal framed as critical for U.S. national security
  • Working group established after high-level meetings
  • Trump walked back earlier tariff threats
  • U.S. pledges no military force to acquire territory
3 min read

Very important deal: US President Trump says Greenland negotiations "pretty well agreed to"

US President Donald Trump states negotiations for Greenland are advancing, calling it a critical national security deal for the United States.

"We have started a negotiation, and I think it's pretty well agreed to. - Donald Trump"

Washington DC, February 1

US President Donald Trump on Saturday said that negotiations over Greenland have begun and are close to an agreement, describing the talks as critical to U.S. national security.

Responding to a reporter's question aboard Air Force One on whether there were updates on Greenland negotiations and contacts with European leaders, Trump said the process was already moving forward.

"We have started a negotiation, and I think it's pretty well agreed to. I mean, they want us to do it," Trump said. "I think it's gonna be a good deal for everybody, very important deal actually, from a national security point of view, very, very important deal. I think we're going to make a deal there."

Trump did not specify whether he had recently spoken with French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer or other European leaders.

According to Politico, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said earlier on Thursday that initial talks among Denmark, the United States, and Greenland over the Arctic island's future had "gone well," though the dispute remains unresolved.

Politico reported that Rasmussen and Greenlandic Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt met with U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington on January 14, where the sides agreed to establish a "working group" to discuss Greenland and Arctic security amid Trump's demands to take over the self-governing Danish territory.

"After that there was a huge derailment," Rasmussen was quoted as saying by Politico, referring to Trump's threat to impose tariffs on several European countries unless they agreed to hand over Greenland, a threat he later walked back after saying he had reached a "framework" toward a deal with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, the details of which have not been made public.

"Things escalated, but now we are back on track," Rasmussen told reporters at the EU Foreign Affairs Council in Brussels, adding that the first meeting of the working group "went well and took place in a constructive atmosphere and tone."

Politico said Rasmussen cautioned that the dispute had not been resolved and that further talks were planned, though he said he was "a little more optimistic" than he had been a week earlier.

Trump's earlier threats to seize Greenland had unsettled European capitals and strained transatlantic relations, prompting calls within the European Union for greater unity and independence on security matters. France and Germany had urged the EU to consider deploying its Anti-Coercion Instrument before Trump backed away from launching a trade war.

Rasmussen credited Trump's decision to step back from tariffs to a strong display of European solidarity over Greenland, according to Politico.

"It has become clear that the price for going down that path has been too high," he said.

On January 21, on the 3rd day of the 2026 World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, Trump's address also included a clarification of the US's intentions regarding Greenland's sovereignty.

He said the United States would not use military force to acquire the territory, softening earlier statements.

He further reversed the proposed 10 per cent tariffs on European allies, which had been aimed at pressuring Denmark over Greenland's status, saying he had reached a "framework of a deal" on mineral and security rights with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
From an Indian perspective, it's fascinating to watch. We have our own border sensitivities. Imagine if a powerful country just announced it was negotiating for one of our states? The double standards in international relations are glaring. Greenland's people must have the final say, not distant capitals.
R
Rohit P
Strategic minerals and Arctic routes are the real prize here. China is also active in the Arctic. The US wants to counter that. As a developing nation, India should watch closely. We need resources too, but must secure them through partnerships, not coercion. 🤔
S
Sarah B
Living in India, I see how big powers operate. First, they create a crisis (tariff threats), then they "solve" it (working groups), and get what they wanted all along (mineral/security rights). Europe showed unity, which is key. A lesson for all nations dealing with pressure tactics.
V
Vikram M
"Pretty well agreed to" according to him, but the Danish minister says the dispute is unresolved. This is why clear, consistent diplomacy matters. Creates so much uncertainty for global markets. India's stance on dialogue and peaceful resolution looks more mature by the day.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, the article shows a positive outcome of European solidarity forcing a recalculation. That's the key takeaway for me. When nations stand together, even the most powerful have to reconsider. A lesson in geopolitical strength for the Global South.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50