US Senator Lindsey Graham Says "I Don't Trust Pakistan" Over Iran Mediation

US Senator Lindsey Graham has declared he does not trust Pakistan as a mediator with Iran, citing allegations that Pakistan allowed Iranian military aircraft to park on its airfields. The comments came during a Senate hearing where Graham questioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Pakistan has dismissed the report as "misleading and sensationalised," while President Trump has adopted a patient stance on negotiations. The allegations threaten to derail ongoing diplomatic efforts between the US and Iran.

Key Points: Lindsey Graham: "I Don't Trust Pakistan" Over Iran Ties

  • Graham distrusts Pakistan as Iran mediator
  • Allegation: Pakistan allowed Iranian aircraft on its airfields
  • Hegseth sidesteps friction in Senate testimony
  • Trump: "No need to rush" Iran negotiations
  • Pakistan denies claims, calls reports misleading
3 min read

US Senator Lindsey Graham, Trump's close political ally, says "I don't trust Pakistan"

US Senator Lindsey Graham casts doubt on Pakistan as a mediator, alleging it sheltered Iranian aircraft. Trump remains patient on Iran talks.

"I don't trust Pakistan as far as I can throw them. - Senator Lindsey Graham"

Washington, DC, May 13

Casting a long shadow over the ongoing diplomatic overtures in the Middle East, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has bluntly declared that he does not "trust" Pakistan, suggesting the United States should pivot to an alternative mediator for a truce with Iran.

The Senator's scathing assessment stems from allegations that Pakistan quietly allowed Iranian military aircraft to park on its airfields, possibly shielding them from American airstrikes.

"I don't trust Pakistan as far as I can throw them. If they actually do have Iranian aircraft parked in Pakistan bases to protect Iranian military assets, that tells me we should be looking maybe for somebody else to mediate. No wonder this damn thing is going nowhere," Senator Graham remarked, highlighting a growing frustration with Islamabad's multifaceted involvement.

Senator Lindsey Graham asked US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth regarding Islamabad's neutrality in ongoing diplomatic efforts during a high-stakes testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee.

The exchange focused on whether the presence of Iranian planes on Pakistani soil was "consistent with [Pakistan] being a fair mediator." While Secretary Hegseth attempted to sidestep the political friction by stating he did not want to get in the middle of negotiations, the Senator from South Carolina offered a sharp rebuttal.

In a post on X earlier, Graham, a close political ally of US President Donald Trump, stated that he would "not be shocked" by such a move by Pakistan, citing an earlier statement from officials from Islamabad on Israel, which has strong ties with Washington.

"If this reporting is accurate, it would require a complete reevaluation of the role Pakistan is playing as mediator between Iran, the United States and other parties. Given some of the prior statements by Pakistani defence officials towards Israel, I would not be shocked if this were true," Graham stated in his post.

CBS News reported that shortly after US President Donald Trump announced the ceasefire in early April, Tehran dispatched several aircraft to the Nur Khan Airbase near Rawalpindi. This development surfaced just as Pakistan confirmed it had received Iranian peace proposals to be "shared with the US side," creating a jarring contrast between Islamabad's public diplomacy and its clandestine military cooperation.

Pakistan has scrambled to dismiss the report, labelling the claims as "misleading and sensationalised". In a formal rebuttal, the Foreign Office maintained that the Iranian aircraft arrived during the ceasefire following initial talks and bears "no linkage" to any military contingency or preservation arrangement.

The statement further alleged that such "speculative narratives" were designed to sabotage regional peace efforts.

President Trump has adopted a patient stance, asserting there was "no need to rush" negotiations while the current economic pressure remains in place. "We don't have to rush anything. We have a blockade which allows them no money. It's a very simple thing: we cannot let them have a nuclear weapon -- because they'd use it," the President stated during an interview with New York's TalkRadio 77 WABC.

Discussing the ultimate objective of halting Tehran's nuclear ambitions, the President expressed absolute certainty in the outcome. When questioned if the US could prevent Iran from enriching uranium or constructing a bomb, he replied, "100%. They're going to stop, and they told me, the Iranians told me... they said that we're going to get the dust."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The US has been using Pakistan as a punching bag for decades. When they need us for Afghanistan, we're allies. When they don't, we're untrustworthy. This 'distrust' narrative is just a convenient excuse for Washington to shift blame for failed diplomacy. Pakistan has legitimate security concerns too, including its own nuclear program and proximity to Iran.
J
James A
I'm an American but I do think Graham is being harsh. Pakistan has complex geopolitical pressures. Hosting Iranian aircraft for diplomatic talks isn't necessarily betrayal—it could be part of the mediation process. The US should respect that Pakistan has its own foreign policy interests and isn't a US puppet.
R
Rohit P
While I agree Pakistan shouldn't be blindly trusted by the US, this whole 'I don't trust Pakistan' drama is just political theatre. Senator Graham knows nothing about our region's complexities. Pakistan's real problem isn't being untrustworthy—it's being stuck between US pressure, Iranian proximity, and Indian rivalry. And let's not forget, the US has a history of abandoning allies in this region when convenient. So who should trust whom? 🤔
S
Sarah B
As a global citizen, I find it ironic that the US questions Pakistan's neutrality when American foreign policy has flip-flopped on so many issues. Pakistan's military has been a US ally in counter-terrorism, but now they're being cast as villains. This is why many in South Asia view American diplomacy as inconsistent. Pakistan should be transparent, but Graham's tone is unnecessarily aggressive.
K
Kavya N
Honestly, Pakistan does need to be more careful about its international image. Hosting Iranian aircraft while acting as mediator does look suspicious, no matter how you spin it. But Graham

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50