US Lawmakers Sound Alarm on China's AI Chip Access as Security Threat

US lawmakers and former officials testified that the competition with China over artificial intelligence is a central national security challenge, with advanced AI chips underpinning modern warfare and economic power. They warned that allowing China access to chips like Nvidia's H200 would accelerate its military modernization in areas from cyber warfare to autonomous drones. China's strategy of "military-civil fusion" blurs the line between civilian and military technology use, making export controls vital. The bipartisan hearing concluded that AI dominance will decide future military competitiveness and requires oversight comparable to arms exports.

Key Points: US Warns China AI Chip Access Risks National Security Edge

  • AI race shapes future military dominance
  • China uses civilian tech for military aims
  • Export controls slow Beijing's progress
  • Advanced chips power modern warfare systems
  • Bipartisan call for stricter oversight
3 min read

US lawmakers warn China AI chip access risks security edge

US lawmakers warn that China's access to advanced AI chips like Nvidia's H200 threatens America's military and economic security in a critical tech race.

"Winning the AI arms race is key to America's national security and our economic security. - Congressman Brian Mast"

Washington, Jan 20

US lawmakers and former national security officials have warned that the accelerating artificial intelligence competition between the United States and China has become a central national security challenge, with advanced AI chips now underpinning modern warfare, intelligence and economic power.

Testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, witnesses said last week that the outcome of the AI race will shape military dominance in the coming decade and determine whether the United States retains its technological edge over China.

Committee chairman Congressman Brian Mast described the stakes in blunt terms. "Winning the AI arms race is key to America's national security and our economic security," he said. "The outcome of this race directly affects military competitiveness of the United States versus China."

Mast said artificial intelligence already powers military command and control, surveillance, cyber operations, and nuclear modernization. "AI dominance can decide who sees first, who decides first, and who strikes first," he said.

Former US national security adviser Matt Pottinger warned against allowing China access to advanced American AI chips, saying such a move would accelerate Beijing's military modernization. "Selling Nvidia's H200 chips to China will supercharge Beijing's military modernization," he said, citing applications ranging from cyber warfare and autonomous drones to intelligence operations.

Pottinger said China's national strategy of "military-civil fusion" makes it impossible to separate civilian and military uses of advanced technology. "There's no such thing as civilian use in one compartment and military use in another," he said.

Former Biden administration official Jon Finer said AI has become the most consequential arena in US-China competition and warned against complacency. "The most hotly contested area determining who eventually prevails will be this intense technology competition," he said.

Finer said China increasingly views artificial intelligence as "the critical technology that will enable their economic and military ambition," adding that export controls on advanced chips and semiconductor manufacturing tools have been central to slowing Beijing's progress.

Witnesses said China's inability to manufacture advanced semiconductors at scale remains its primary bottleneck, despite massive state subsidies. Pottinger cited public statements by Chinese leaders acknowledging gaps in core AI technologies and the need to "face up to the gap."

China, he said, is attempting to close that gap by purchasing advanced foreign chips. "China is doing everything that they can to catch up and dominate us," Pottinger said.

Lawmakers also raised concerns that private Chinese technology companies purchasing US chips often work closely with the state. Pottinger cited firms such as DeepSeek, Alibaba and Tencent as examples of companies tied to China's broader military objectives.

The hearing reflected bipartisan agreement that AI policy is no longer a theoretical issue limited to commercial innovation. "These chips affect real wars, real weapons and real casualties," Mast said, calling for congressional oversight comparable to that applied to arms exports.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
The US-China tech war is heating up. While it's their competition, the spillover effects on global supply chains impact everyone. India needs to play this smartly and build partnerships without getting caught in the crossfire.
A
Aman W
Interesting to see the focus on military-civil fusion. China's approach is very integrated, while India's public and private sectors sometimes work in silos. We need better synergy for national tech goals. Jai Hind!
S
Sarah B
From an Indian perspective, this underscores why we need our own robust R&D in critical technologies. The PLI schemes are a good start, but the pace needs to match the geopolitical urgency.
K
Karthik V
The part about "who sees first, who decides first" is chilling. AI in warfare is a reality. India must ensure our defence forces are not left behind in this new era of tech-driven combat.
V
Varun X
While the security concerns are valid, I hope this doesn't lead to excessive tech protectionism that stifles global innovation. There has to be a balance. India can be a voice for responsible, open collaboration.
N
Nikhil C
China's bottleneck in semiconductor manufacturing is an opportunity for India. If we can build a strong domestic fab ecosystem, we

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50