US Senate Hearing Highlights India’s Role in Global Fertiliser Crisis

US lawmakers and farmers cited India's massive fertiliser purchases as a key factor in the global supply crisis during a Senate hearing. Corey Rosenbusch of The Fertilizer Institute highlighted India's 2.5 million metric ton urea tender at nearly $1,000 per ton, driven by heavy government subsidies. American farmers reported fertiliser costs nearly doubling, with some abandoning phosphate use due to economic pressures. The hearing also raised concerns over Strait of Hormuz disruptions and China's export restrictions, prompting bipartisan legislation for market transparency.

Key Points: India’s Fertiliser Imports Cited in US Farm Crisis Hearing

  • India's $1,000/ton urea tender influences global prices
  • US farmers face soaring costs, reduced fertiliser use
  • Strait of Hormuz disruptions threaten supply chains
  • Bipartisan US bill targets market transparency
  • India's subsidy burden may rise amid geopolitical tensions
3 min read

US lawmakers cite India's fertiliser imports amid farm cost crisis

US senators and farmers warn of rising fertiliser costs, citing India’s massive urea purchases and subsidy policies as key factors in the global supply crisis.

"India, the world's second largest consumer of fertiliser behind China, their federal government procures their fertiliser; they then heavily subsidise it to keep prices low for their farmers. - Corey Rosenbusch"

Washington, May 14

India's massive fertiliser purchases and subsidy-driven farm policies were cited repeatedly during a heated US Senate hearing this week as American lawmakers and farmers warned that global supply disruptions and soaring input costs were pushing US agriculture deeper into crisis.

At the hearing of the Senate Agriculture Committee, witnesses said global fertiliser markets had become increasingly volatile due to geopolitical tensions, export restrictions and supply bottlenecks linked to the Strait of Hormuz.

Several senators and industry leaders pointed directly to India's growing role in the global fertiliser trade, describing the country as one of the biggest buyers shaping international prices.

Corey Rosenbusch, President and CEO of The Fertilizer Institute, told lawmakers that India, the world's second-largest fertiliser consumer after China, had recently issued a major urea tender for 2.5 million metric tons at nearly $1,000 per metric ton.

"India recently did another urea tender for 2.5 million metric tons of urea at nearly $1,000 per metric ton," Rosenbusch said.

He said the Indian government heavily subsidised fertiliser purchases to shield farmers from rising global prices, a policy that was influencing worldwide demand and supply patterns.

"In India, the world's second largest consumer of fertiliser behind China, their federal government procures their fertiliser; they then heavily subsidise it to keep prices low for their farmers," he told the committee.

The hearing came as US farmers complained of surging fertiliser costs, shrinking margins and growing bankruptcies across rural America. Lawmakers from both parties described the situation as a national security issue tied to food supply and geopolitical instability.

Committee Chairman Sen. John Boozman called the crisis "a generational event" for American agriculture.

South Dakota farmer Trent Kubik told senators fertiliser costs had nearly doubled in recent years, forcing farmers to reduce fertiliser use and alter planting decisions.

"In 2025, we did not apply any phosphate on our farm because it just did not make economic sense for us," Kubik said.

Kentucky farmer Eddie Melton said many producers were operating with little or no working capital while facing sharp increases in fertiliser prices.

"Since February, we have seen a 33 per cent rise in anhydrous prices, a 55 per cent rise in urea prices, and a 25 per cent increase in liquid nitrogen," Melton said.

Witnesses also pointed to disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most critical shipping routes for energy and fertiliser ingredients. Rosenbusch told lawmakers that nearly 34 per cent of globally traded urea and half of the world's sulphur exports moved through the region.

The hearing, among other things, highlighted concerns over China's export restrictions on fertiliser products, with witnesses warning that tightening global supplies were worsening price pressures for farmers worldwide.

Several senators backed bipartisan legislation aimed at improving fertiliser market transparency and increasing domestic US production capacity.

India is among the world's largest importers of fertilisers and remains highly dependent on global supply chains for urea, potash and phosphates.

Any prolonged disruption in Gulf shipping routes or spikes in international fertiliser prices could increase New Delhi's subsidy burden and impact agricultural input costs ahead of key crop seasons.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
I'm a farmer in Iowa and this is spot on. Indian subsidies distort global markets and drive up prices for everyone else. No hard feelings, but it's a policy problem that needs addressing at WTO level.
A
Aditya G
Before blaming India, maybe look at your own supply chain issues? Strait of Hormuz disruptions, China's export restrictions, and corporate consolidation in fertiliser industry affect prices far more than Indian demand. Also, our farmers are way poorer than US farmers - subsidy is essential for food security.
J
Jessica F
As an economist, I see both sides. India needs to protect its farmers, but unchecked subsidies do create global imbalances. Perhaps a more sustainable middle ground - like promoting organic fertilisers and precision farming - could benefit everyone long-term.
N
Nisha Z
Wait, US lawmakers complaining about India's fertiliser purchases? The same US that dumps billions in farm subsidies through Farm Bill? 😂 Pot calling kettle black! Let's talk about US cotton subsidies that hurt African farmers for decades.
R
Ravi K
This is a wake-up call for India. We can't keep relying on imported fertilisers indefinitely. Need to invest in domestic production, nano urea technology, and promote natural farming like Andhra Pradesh is doing. Atmanirbhar Bharat in fertilisers should be priority.
E
Emma D

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50