"US-Iran talks could happen over next two days in Islamabad": Reports
Islamabad, April 15
US-Iran peace talks may shift to Pakistan's capital, with President Donald Trump indicating that the next round of negotiations "could be happening over the next two days" in Islamabad after the stalemate in phase one of negotiations prompted Washington to impose a blockade on Iranian ports, according to reports cited by The New York Post and Khaleej Times.
In an initial telephonic interview, Trump said the ongoing discussions were "happening, but, you know, a little bit slow," while suggesting that a second round of direct negotiations aimed at ending the ongoing seven-week conflict would likely be held in Europe.
The remarks by Trump came after reports had circulated online purportedly claiming that the location for negotiations was being changed.
However, shortly after, Trump called back with a revised update.
"You should stay there, really, because something could be happening over the next two days, and we're more inclined to go there," he said of Islamabad. "It's more likely, you know why? Because the field marshal is doing a great job."
He was referring to Pakistan's Field Marshal Gen. Asim Munir, with whom he reportedly developed a rapport last year during heightened tensions involving India and Pakistan, which later de-escalated after a brief four-day conflict that the US helped mediate.
"He's fantastic, and therefore it's more likely that we go back there," he said. "Why should we go to some country that has nothing to do with it?"
"I just think he's a great guy. That guy. The field marshal. You know he ended the war with India, saved 30 million people," he added.
Trump also clarified that he would not personally participate in the proposed second round of negotiations and did not name who would represent the United States.
Meanwhile, he expressed dissatisfaction over reports suggesting that Washington had sought Iran's agreement to pause uranium enrichment for at least two decades following unsuccessful talks over the weekend.
"I've been saying they can't have nuclear weapons", he said, "so I don't like the 20 years."
When asked whether such a long moratorium could help secure a deal, Trump said, "I don't want them [Iran] to feel like they have a win," The New York Post quoted.
On the diplomatic front, retired Pakistani Lt Gen Muhammad Saeed, who is said to be involved in facilitating the talks, stated that Tehran had shown "flexibility" on the contentious issue of uranium enrichment, which had repeatedly stalled negotiations.
However, Trump cautioned that Iran would need to present any compromise in a politically acceptable manner domestically.
"Iran has to be able to take something back to its people that doesn't look like a surrender," said Saeed, describing the Islamic Republic's need to frame any compromise as being made "in the golden trust of the people."
Contrasting this, Mohammad Marandi, who accompanied the Iranian delegation in Islamabad, adopted a firm stance, stating, "A blockade won't change Iran's position," and adding that "ending enrichment will not be accepted," The New York Post reported.
— ANI
Reader Comments
Trump praising Pakistan's Field Marshal for "ending the war with India" is a gross oversimplification of a very complex situation. It undermines India's diplomatic efforts and restraint. The US should be more careful with its words when referring to regional conflicts.
As an Indian, my primary concern is regional stability. If these talks in Islamabad can prevent a larger conflict and stop nuclear proliferation, it's good for everyone. But the US should not let Pakistan leverage this for geopolitical gains against India. Jai Hind!
The whole "golden trust of the people" line from the Pakistani general is quite something. Every nation needs to save face, but Iran cannot be allowed to continue enrichment. A 20-year pause is better than nothing, but permanent denuclearization should be the goal. 👍
Trump's style is so unpredictable! One minute it's Europe, next it's Islamabad. While I hope for peace, this inconsistency doesn't inspire confidence. Also, giving so much credit to Pakistan's military leadership feels like a deliberate snub to other democracies in the region.
From a strategic perspective, holding talks in Islamabad is smart. It's a neutral-ish ground for US-Iran talks, away from direct European or Arab influence. But the Indian government will be watching this very, very closely. Any perception of Pakistan being rewarded is problematic.
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.