Iran Claims US 'Forced' Into Ceasefire, Vows Strong Response if Needed

The Iranian Supreme Leader's representative in India claims the United States was forced to announce a ceasefire after realizing it could not sustain the conflict and faced further defeat. He states that a lasting peace is contingent upon the US accepting Iran's conditions, while maintaining that Iran never desired the war. The representative firmly denies Iran possesses or seeks nuclear weapons, declaring them religiously forbidden. He also blames the US for regional instability, asserting Iran targeted only American military bases, not neighbouring countries or civilians.

Key Points: Iran: US 'Forced' Into Ceasefire, Nuclear Weapons 'Haram'

  • US ceasefire was compelled by inability to fight
  • Peace depends on accepting Iran's terms
  • Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons
  • Blames US for regional instability
3 min read

US 'forced' into ceasefire, says Iranian Supreme Leader's India representative (IANS Exclusive)

Iranian Supreme Leader's India rep says US ceasefire was not voluntary. Details on war conditions, nuclear stance, and regional tensions in exclusive IANS interview.

"The US was forced to announce a ceasefire because it could not continue the war. - Abdul Majid Hakeem Ilahi"

New Delhi, April 8

The Iranian Supreme Leader's representative in India, Abdul Majid Hakeem Ilahi, on Wednesday claimed that the United States was compelled to announce a ceasefire with Iran after failing to sustain the conflict, and asserting that continued hostilities would have led to further setbacks for Washington.

In an exclusive interaction with IANS, Ilahi said that the US decision to halt the war was not voluntary but driven by its inability to continue fighting.

"The US was forced to announce a ceasefire because it could not continue the war. They made a big mistake, and within the last 41 days, they wanted to stop the war but could not do it. Finally, when they realised they could not continue and would face further defeat, they announced a ceasefire," he said.

On whether the ceasefire could pave the way for a lasting resolution, Ilahi indicated that peace would depend on the acceptance of Iran's terms.

"With our conditions... if they accept our conditions, yes, it will be the end of this war," he stated.

Reflecting on the broader conflict, Ilahi maintained that Iran had no intention of engaging in war and described the situation as being imposed on the country.

"From the beginning, we did not want this war; it was imposed on us. We also realised that many people from different countries suffered because of it, which we did not want. We did not want to attack civilians in countries that were attacking us. We were always guided by humanity and international laws regarding war," he said.

However, he added that Iran was prepared to respond decisively, if necessary.

"In the end, we also have to know how to respond, and they realised that if they continued, we would respond strongly," Ilahi remarked.

Addressing allegations regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions, Ilahi categorically denied that Tehran possesses or seeks to develop nuclear weapons, citing religious principles.

"This is not true. From the beginning, our Supreme Leader had clearly announced that nuclear weapons are forbidden (Haram) according to our religion. We do not want them now or in the future -- never," he said.

On accusations by Gulf countries regarding attacks allegedly carried out by Iran, Ilahi blamed external interference in the region for escalating tensions.

"We have lived in this region together for thousands of years without such conflicts. The crises began when America came from thousands of miles away and brought instability. The bases used by the US to attack us are located in neighbouring Arab countries," he said.

He clarified that Iran's actions were directed at US military infrastructure rather than neighbouring nations.

"We were forced to target American bases, but we never attacked our neighbours or civilians, although we could have done that," Ilahi added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an expat living in Delhi, I find this analysis quite one-sided. The claim that the US was "forced" into a ceasefire seems like posturing. The reality of geopolitics is far more complex than a simple narrative of victory and defeat.
P
Priya S
India has strong ties with both Iran and the US. We must navigate this carefully. Our energy security and Chabahar port project are crucial. Hope our diplomacy can help bring lasting peace to the region. 🙏
R
Rohit P
The statement about nuclear weapons being 'Haram' is significant. If true, it should ease tensions. But actions speak louder than words. The international community needs verifiable proof. Stability in the Gulf is vital for global trade, including ours.
K
Karthik V
Blaming all problems on American interference is an old tune. Regional powers also have responsibility. As an Indian, I'm just glad there's a ceasefire. Too many innocent lives are lost in these conflicts. Let's hope it holds.
M
Meera T
Whatever the rhetoric, a ceasefire is welcome news. The common people in the region, and the world, suffer the most during war. India should use its good relations to be a bridge for peace. Our foreign policy is being tested.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50