Iran Claims US 'Forced' Into Ceasefire, Vows Strong Response If Needed

Iran's representative in India claims the United States was forced to announce a ceasefire due to an inability to continue the conflict. He states that a lasting peace is contingent on the US accepting Iran's conditions. The representative firmly denies Iran possesses or seeks nuclear weapons, citing religious prohibition. He blames US interference for regional instability and asserts Iran's attacks targeted only American military bases.

Key Points: Iran: US 'Forced' Into Ceasefire, Nuclear Weapons 'Haram'

  • US compelled to ceasefire
  • Iran sets conditions for peace
  • Denies seeking nuclear weapons
  • Blames US for regional instability
  • Ready to respond strongly if needed
3 min read

US 'forced' into ceasefire, says Iran Supreme Leader's India representative (IANS Exclusive)

Iran's Supreme Leader's India rep says US was compelled to halt conflict, denies nuclear ambitions, and states peace depends on Tehran's terms.

"The US was forced to announce a ceasefire because it could not continue the war. - Abdul Majid Hakeem Ilahi"

New Delhi, April 8

Iran's Supreme Leader's representative in India, Abdul Majid Hakeem Ilahi, on Wednesday claimed that the United States was compelled to announce a ceasefire with Iran after failing to sustain the conflict, and asserting that continued hostilities would have led to further setbacks for Washington.

In an exclusive interaction with IANS, Ilahi said that the US decision to halt the war was not voluntary but driven by its inability to continue fighting.

"The US was forced to announce a ceasefire because it could not continue the war. They made a big mistake, and within the last 41 days, they wanted to stop the war but could not do it. Finally, when they realised they could not continue and would face further defeat, they announced a ceasefire," he said.

On whether the ceasefire could pave the way for a lasting resolution, Ilahi indicated that peace would depend on the acceptance of Iran's terms.

"With our conditions... if they accept our conditions, yes, it will be the end of this war," he stated.

Reflecting on the broader conflict, Ilahi maintained that Iran had no intention of engaging in war and described the situation as being imposed on the country.

"From the beginning, we did not want this war; it was imposed on us. We also realised that many people from different countries suffered because of it, which we did not want. We did not want to attack civilians in countries that were attacking us. We were always guided by humanity and international laws regarding war," he said.

However, he added that Iran was prepared to respond decisively, if necessary.

"In the end, we also have to know how to respond, and they realised that if they continued, we would respond strongly," Ilahi remarked.

Addressing allegations regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions, Ilahi categorically denied that Tehran possesses or seeks to develop nuclear weapons, citing religious principles.

"This is not true. From the beginning, our Supreme Leader had clearly announced that nuclear weapons are forbidden (Haram) according to our religion. We do not want them now or in the future -- never," he said.

On accusations by Gulf countries regarding attacks allegedly carried out by Iran, Ilahi blamed external interference in the region for escalating tensions.

"We have lived in this region together for thousands of years without such conflicts. The crises began when America came from thousands of miles away and brought instability. The bases used by the US to attack us are located in neighbouring Arab countries," he said.

He clarified that Iran's actions were directed at US military infrastructure rather than neighbouring nations.

"We were forced to target American bases, but we never attacked our neighbours or civilians, although we could have done that," Ilahi added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone living in Delhi, the tension in the Middle East directly impacts oil prices and our economy. A ceasefire is a relief, but a lasting peace is what we truly need. Hope diplomacy wins.
R
Rohit P
The representative says war was "imposed" on Iran. But let's be real, the region has been a tinderbox for years. Blaming everything on America is an oversimplification. Every country has a role in de-escalation. India should continue its balanced approach. 🇮🇳
P
Priya S
The nuclear weapons denial based on religious principles is a strong statement. If true, it should be verifiable by international bodies. Stability in the Persian Gulf is crucial for India's Chabahar port project and broader connectivity plans.
A
Aman W
Finally some sense prevails! No one wins in a war. The common people suffer the most, be it in Iran, the US, or here in India where we feel the economic shockwaves. Hope this ceasefire holds. 🙏
K
Karthik V
This is just posturing. The US has massive military capacity; they weren't "forced" due to inability. It's likely a strategic pause. India must focus on its own interests—securing energy supplies and ensuring the safety of Indian ships and citizens in the region.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50