US Puts China, Indo-Pacific at Heart of Defense Strategy for Global Power

The United States has identified China and the Indo-Pacific region as the central focus of its 2026 National Defense Strategy. The document warns that dominance of the region by a single power, particularly China, would threaten global economic access and American security. The strategy aims to prevent regional domination through a posture of "deterrence by denial" and strengthened alliances, while seeking a stable peace. It explicitly links America's domestic industrial revival to secure access to Indo-Pacific markets and sea lanes.

Key Points: US Defense Strategy Prioritizes China, Indo-Pacific for Security

  • Indo-Pacific as global economic center
  • China's historic military buildup
  • Strategy of "deterrence by denial"
  • Focus on allied collective defense
  • Linking regional security to US reindustrialization
3 min read

US defence strategy puts China, Indo-Pacific first

The US 2026 National Defense Strategy centers on deterring Chinese dominance in the Indo-Pacific, linking regional control to American prosperity and security.

"Our goal is simple: To prevent anyone, including China, from being able to dominate us or our allies. - 2026 National Defense Strategy"

Washington, Jan 25

The United States has placed China and the Indo-Pacific at the center of its national security planning, warning that control of the region will determine global economic power and directly shape America's security, freedom, and prosperity, according to the 2026 National Defense Strategy released by the Department of War.

The strategy states that the Indo-Pacific "will soon make up more than half of the global economy," making American access to the region a vital national interest. It cautions that if China or any other power were able to dominate the region, it would gain the ability to "effectively veto Americans' access to the world's economic center of gravity," with long-term consequences for US economic strength and industrial revival.

Describing China as "already the second most powerful country in the world," the document highlights the "speed, scale, and quality of China's historic military buildup," particularly forces designed for operations in the Western Pacific and beyond. While acknowledging China's internal challenges, the strategy says Beijing has shown it can "spend even more on its military" and do so effectively.

Running into 26 pages, the unclassified version of the strategy emphasises that Washington's objective is not confrontation or regime change, but preventing any single power from dominating the region. "Our goal is simple: To prevent anyone, including China, from being able to dominate us or our allies," it states, adding that the United States does not seek to "dominate China," nor to "strangle or humiliate them."

Instead, the Pentagon says it will pursue what it describes as "deterrence by denial," aimed at ensuring that aggression fails before it begins. As part of that approach, the United States will "erect a strong denial defense along the First Island Chain" and urge regional allies and partners to contribute more to collective defence.

The strategy stresses that the US military posture in the Indo-Pacific is designed to support diplomacy, not undermine it. "A decent peace, on terms favorable to Americans but that China can also accept and live under, is possible," the document says, describing this as the premise of President Donald Trump's approach to relations with Beijing.

At the same time, the Department of War says it will seek to expand military-to-military communication with the People's Liberation Army to support "strategic stability," "deconfliction," and "de-escalation." These engagements, it says, will be paired with a clear demonstration of US strength to ensure that American leaders can negotiate "from a position of strength."

The strategy links the Indo-Pacific directly to domestic prosperity, arguing that US reindustrialization depends on secure access to regional markets and sea lanes.

While the document underscores a desire for stability, it also makes clear that the US military will retain the ability to conduct "devastating strikes and operations against targets anywhere in the world," including directly from the US homeland, to ensure deterrence credibility.

The Indo-Pacific focus marks a clear prioritization as the United States seeks to balance global commitments. The strategy states that while other threats persist, defending the homeland and deterring China are the foremost missions shaping force posture and investment decisions.

In recent years, India has emerged as a central player in the Indo-Pacific, with growing economic weight and an expanding role in regional security discussions. US policymakers have increasingly described the region as the primary theater shaping 21st-century geopolitics.

China's military modernization and territorial assertions in the Indo-Pacific have been a source of concern for several regional countries, prompting greater emphasis on balance-of-power strategies and multilateral cooperation to preserve stability and freedom of navigation.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The part about "deterrence by denial" and the First Island Chain is very telling. It seems the US wants to contain China's influence without direct conflict. For us in India, the key is to ensure our sovereignty and interests are not compromised in this great power game. We are not a pawn.
R
Rohit P
Good analysis. The Indo-Pacific *is* the future, and half the global economy will be here. India's rise is perfectly timed. We need to build our navy and economic corridors like never before. Atmanirbhar Bharat must extend to maritime security!
S
Sarah B
While the strategy talks of not seeking to dominate China, the language of "negotiating from a position of strength" and "devastating strikes" is inherently confrontational. I hope diplomacy prevails. Stability in this region is crucial for global trade, including for India's exports.
V
Vikram M
The US reindustrialization depends on this region, they admit it. So does India's Viksit Bharat 2047 vision. Our security in the Indian Ocean is non-negotiable. We must work with all partners who respect that, but our primary goal should be self-reliance. Jai Hind!
K
Karthik V
A respectful criticism: The article and the US strategy both frame this as a US-China issue. The voice and agency of other regional nations, including India, ASEAN countries, Japan, and Australia, seem secondary. The future of the Indo-Pacific should be decided *by* the Indo-Pacific nations, not for them.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50