Delhi HC Slams AI Deepfakes Misusing Ramdev's Persona as Illegal

The Delhi High Court has observed that unauthorized AI-generated deepfakes and manipulated content misusing Swami Ramdev's persona are prima facie illegal. Justice Jyoti Singh noted such content exploits his reputation for commercial gain and could mislead the public, posing potential health risks. The court granted an interim injunction, restraining entities from using Ramdev's likeness without consent and ordering platforms to take down specified content. While some platforms raised parody defenses, the court emphasized unauthorized commercial exploitation is impermissible and will be examined further.

Key Points: Delhi HC: AI Deepfakes Misusing Ramdev Illegal

  • AI deepfakes violate personality rights
  • Misleading endorsements risk public health
  • Court grants interim injunction
  • Platforms ordered to block content
  • Parody defenses to be examined
3 min read

Unauthorised AI, deepfake content misusing Swami Ramdev's persona prima facie illegal: Delhi HC

Delhi High Court rules unauthorized AI deepfakes of Swami Ramdev violate his rights, orders takedowns, and warns of public health risks.

"unauthorised commercial exploitation of a public figure's persona is impermissible - Delhi High Court"

New Delhi, February 25

The Delhi High Court has observed that the unauthorised use of yoga guru Swami Ramdev's name, likeness, voice and persona through AI-generated deepfakes, manipulated videos, fake endorsements, and misleading online content prima facie violates his personality and publicity rights and has the potential to mislead the public.

Justice Jyoti Singh, while hearing a commercial suit filed by Ramdev against unidentified entities and digital platforms, noted that the plaintiff is a globally recognised figure in yoga and Ayurveda whose identity attributes, including his appearance, voice, saffron attire and distinctive style of speech, are uniquely associated with him and legally protectable. The Court recorded that through decades of public engagement and institutional work, he has earned substantial goodwill, reputation and public trust.

The Court took note of allegations that Ramdev's persona has been widely misused across social media platforms, video-sharing websites and e-commerce listings. According to the plaint, AI-generated deepfake videos, manipulated images, impersonating accounts, and fabricated endorsements falsely depict him promoting medicines, consumer goods, and other products without authorisation. Such content, the Court observed, appears intended to exploit his reputation for commercial gain and online engagement.

The Court further observed that some content falsely portrays the plaintiff as endorsing medical advice or health products. Such misinformation, it noted, could not only damage his reputation but also pose risks to public health if individuals rely on misleading claims. The material on record also indicates altered videos, meme content, and repeated reposting designed to amplify misleading representations and distort his public image.

Intermediary platforms argued that certain posts fall within satire, parody or commentary protected under free speech. The Court said this issue requires further examination, but emphasised that unauthorised commercial exploitation of a public figure's persona is impermissible and may amount to passing off and copyright infringement.

On a prima facie assessment, the Court held that Ramdev has made out a strong case for interim protection, observing that AI-manipulated visuals and fabricated endorsements can tarnish credibility, erode public trust and dilute brand value. It also noted that digitally altered content linking him to unrelated products or messages may mislead viewers into believing such accounts are official.

Pending further hearing, the Court granted an ex parte ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants and associated persons from using Ramdev's name, image, voice, likeness or distinctive attributes without consent, creating or circulating AI-generated content or deepfakes exploiting his persona, and selling or advertising goods or services using his identity without authorisation.

The Court also directed platforms and authorities to take down and block specified URLs and listings within 72 hours, including certain videos and e-commerce links, and to disable additional identified content. However, for certain URLs where parody and satire defences have been raised, the Court permitted parties to address arguments on the next date of hearing.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
While protecting someone's likeness from commercial misuse is fair, I hope the court's final ruling carefully balances this with freedom of expression. Satire and parody are important, especially in a democracy. The line between malicious fake news and legitimate commentary shouldn't be blurred.
V
Vikram M
Finally! I've seen so many YouTube shorts and WhatsApp forwards with his deepfake voice selling some random churna or oil. It's pure cheating. These platforms must be held accountable for not taking these down sooner. Public health is at stake.
P
Priya S
Good step by Delhi HC. But this is just one case. So many other celebrities and even common people are facing this AI deepfake menace. We need a strong, comprehensive law for the entire country, not just case-by-case orders. Jai Hind!
R
Rohit P
The 72-hour takedown order for platforms is crucial. Often they drag their feet. Swami Ramdev has built Patanjali from the ground up, his image is his brand. Can't let fraudsters ruin decades of trust for quick money.
M
Michael C
Interesting precedent being set here in India regarding AI and personality rights. The global community will be watching how the court handles the "parody vs. infringement" arguments in the next hearing. A nuanced approach is needed.
A
Ananya R

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50