UNGA Chief: UN Charter "Not Optional" Amid Venezuela Crisis and US Action

UN General Assembly President Annalena Baerbock emphasized that the UN Charter is a mandatory framework for international conduct, specifically addressing the crisis in Venezuela following U.S. military action. She underscored that Article 2 requires states to refrain from the threat or use of force against another state's territorial integrity. Her comments come as deposed Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro was taken into U.S. custody, with Vice President Delcy Rodriguez assuming presidential powers. Former U.S. National Security Advisor John Bolton revealed past plans to remove Maduro, noting President Trump's initial interest in Venezuelan oil.

Key Points: UN Charter Mandatory, Not Optional, Says UNGA Head on Venezuela

  • UN Charter adherence is mandatory
  • Article 2 forbids use of force
  • Lasting peace requires human rights
  • Maduro removed, VP assumes power
  • US action lacked congressional approval
3 min read

"The UN Charter is not optional": UNGA president Annalena Baerbock on Venezuela crisis

UNGA President Annalena Baerbock stresses the UN Charter is compulsory, citing Venezuela crisis and US military action. Details on Maduro's removal.

"The UN Charter is not optional": UNGA president Annalena Baerbock on Venezuela crisis
"The UN Charter is not optional—it is our guiding framework, in moments of calm and in times of crisis. - Annalena Baerbock"

New York, January 4

President of the United Nations General Assembly Annalena Baerbock on Sunday stressed that adherence to the UN Charter is mandatory and not optional, as international attention remains focused on Venezuela following United States military action.

In a post on X, Baerbock said the UN Charter must serve as the guiding framework for international conduct "in moments of calm and in times of crisis," specifically referring to the situation in Venezuela, which she said had culminated in US military action.

"The UN Charter is not optional--it is our guiding framework, in moments of calm and in times of crisis, like in Venezuela today, culminating with the United States military action," Baerbock said.

She underlined that Article 2 of the UN Charter clearly stipulates that all UN member states must refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state or act in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.

Emphasising the broader implications, Baerbock said respect for the UN Charter and international law forms the foundation of the international order and warned against a global system governed by power rather than law.

"A peaceful, safe and just world for everyone is only possible if the rule of law prevails instead of might makes right," she said.

She also highlighted the importance of human rights, including those of the Venezuelan people, stating that lasting peace depends on human rights prevailing over violations.

Baerbock's remarks come amid rapidly unfolding developments surrounding Venezuela's leadership.

Deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro was seen wishing reporters and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents a Happy New Year and Good Night during his perp walk, footage of which was later released by US authorities showing him in handcuffs as he was led into custody.

Following Maduro's removal, Venezuela's Supreme Court ordered Vice President Delcy Rodriguez to assume the powers and duties of acting president, CNN reported.

The order, announced late Saturday night local time, concluded that Maduro was in a "material and temporary impossibility to exercise his functions."

According to the ruling read by Justice Tania D'Amelio during a session broadcast on state television channel VTV, Rodriguez will "assume and exercise, as acting president, all the powers, duties, and faculties inherent to the office of president of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, in order to guarantee administrative continuity and the comprehensive defense of the nation," CNN reported.

Venezuela's constitution states that when there is a temporary or absolute absence of the president, the vice president must replace them.

Providing background to the US actions, former US National Security Advisor John Bolton told CNN that a plan to remove Maduro had been presented to US President Donald Trump during his first term but failed to advance because administration officials were unable to keep the president "focused" on the issue.

Bolton said Trump was "very interested in the Venezuelan oil" at the time and that while his team managed to get him interested in the idea of removing Maduro, they "couldn't keep him focused on it."

He also said the Venezuelan opposition then believed that sustained economic pressure would be sufficient to split Maduro's regime.

According to CNN, the United States later launched what Trump described as a "large-scale strike against Venezuela" and captured Maduro to face charges, carrying out the regime change effort without congressional approval.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
The principle is correct, but the UN's selective application is the real problem. Where was this strong stance during other crises? It often feels like rules are only enforced against certain nations. The world needs consistent, impartial institutions.
A
Aman W
"Very interested in the Venezuelan oil" – this says it all, no? 🤔 It's never about democracy or human rights for these powers. It's about resources. We've seen this playbook before. Hope the Venezuelan people find stability and peace soon.
S
Sarah B
As an international relations student in Delhi, this is a classic case study. The tension between sovereignty (Article 2) and the responsibility to protect human rights. A complex situation, but military action without UNSC mandate is clearly a violation.
V
Vikram M
Strong words from the UNGA President. But will powerful nations listen? The global south often bears the brunt when international law is ignored. India must continue to advocate for a multipolar world order based on rules, not sheer power.
K
Kavya N
The most shocking part is the former advisor saying they "couldn't keep him focused on it." This is how major decisions about regime change are made? It sounds chaotic and irresponsible. The Venezuelan people deserve better than to be a side project in someone's foreign policy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50