NewKerala.com

UK May Return Rejected Asylum Seekers to Taliban-Led Afghanistan

The UK is considering returning rejected Afghan asylum seekers to Taliban-led Afghanistan, signalling a possible policy shift. Over 6,000 Afghans arrived in the UK via small boats in the year ending June 2025. More than 20 EU states are exploring similar return policies despite humanitarian concerns. UN rapporteur Richard Bennett warned that such returns could violate international law due to widespread human rights violations.

Key Points: UK Considers Returns to Afghanistan Despite Crisis

  • UK considers returning rejected Afghan asylum seekers
  • Over 6,000 Afghans arrived via small boats in year to June 2025
  • More than 20 EU states exploring similar policies
  • UN warns returns could violate international law
2 min read

UK not ruling out possibility of returning rejected asylum seekers to Afghanistan: Report

UK signals possible review of Afghan asylum returns, considering deportations amid Taliban rule, humanitarian crisis, and EU talks.

"Any returns risk breaching the principle of non-refoulement due to widespread human rights violations including against women, human rights defenders and former public servants - Richard Bennett"

London, April 25

The United Kingdom has signalled a possible review of Afghan asylum returns as humanitarian crisis and refugee concerns intensify, Afghan media reported on Saturday. The possibility of returning rejected Afghan asylum seekers to Afghanistan is not ruled out, Khaama Press reported citing that London is closely monitoring discussions between Taliban authorities and the European Union on potential return arrangements, while internal government talks are ongoing.

Any such move, the report highlighted, would likely attract strong opposition from human rights groups, and would make a significant shift from the current UK policy, given the worsening conditions in Taliban-led Afghanistan.

"The UK currently cannot deport rejected Afghan asylum seekers due to the absence of formal recognition of Taliban authorities, but officials signalled that options remain under consideration. Afghans were the largest group arriving in the UK via small boats in the year ending June 2025, with more than 6,000 arrivals, while asylum approval rates have dropped sharply in recent years," Khaama reported.

It mentioned that, across Europe, several countries are also exploring returns, with reports that more than 20 EU states are considering similar policies despite ongoing legal and humanitarian concerns amid Afghanistan facing a severe humanitarian crisis, with widespread poverty, unemployment, and aid shortages that have left millions dependent on assistance, while women and girls face sweeping restrictions on education, work, and public life.

Earlier this week, Richard Bennett, the UN special rapporteur for Afghanistan, raised concerns over reported plans by European officials to host Taliban representatives for talks on deporting Afghan migrants, warning that such returns could violate international law.

"Reports of EU hosting Taliban officials to discuss deporting Afghans are seriously concerning. Any returns risk breaching the principle of non-refoulement due to widespread human rights violations including against women, human rights defenders and former public servants," Bennett posted on X.

His comments, reported Afghan media outlet Amu tv, come as European Union officials are reportedly considering holding talks with a Taliban delegation in Brussels on the issue.

"The proposed talks, which have not been formally confirmed, are expected to focus on the logistics of returning Afghan nationals without legal status in the bloc, including flight arrangements and conditions upon arrival in Kabul. The plans have already drawn criticism from some European lawmakers," Amu TV reported.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

J
James A
It's easy for European countries to talk about returns but they haven't seen the ground reality. I've worked with Afghan refugees in Delhi—they fled with nothing. Deporting them now would be criminal. India has sheltered millions before, it's time the world showed some humanity.
K
Kavitha C
As an Indian woman, I feel sick reading this. The Taliban have banned girls from education, erased women from public life. And now the UK wants to send people back there? This is not policy, it's cruelty. Why can't they look at the example of India? We gave shelter to Afghan Hindus and Sikhs.
R
Ravi K
The UK is being hypocritical. They talk about human rights but also want cheap labour. If they're going to deport people, they should ensure conditions in Afghanistan improve first. Right now it's a disaster—poverty, hunger, oppression. The UN rapporteur is absolutely correct about non-refoulement.
P
Priyanka N
I understand the UK has its own immigration issues, but this is not the answer. Afghans have suffered enough. India has always stood with the Afghan people—we didn't abandon them. The West needs to show similar compassion. And honestly, talking to the Taliban for deportations legitimises them. Wrong move. 😤
D
Deepak U
Reasonable take: The UK is a sovereign nation and can decide its policies. But if they're sending people back, they need to verify safety. You can't just deport thousands without a proper assessment. India has a strict refugee policy too, but we never force people into warzones. Common sense, guys.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50