US Peace Plan Circulated via Pakistan; Iran Rejects "Excessive" Terms

U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff confirmed Pakistan acted as an intermediary to deliver a 15-point American peace framework to Iran. Iran has responded negatively, calling the proposal excessive and insisting any ceasefire must be on its own terms and timeline. A senior Iranian official outlined five specific conditions for ending the war, including reparations and control over the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict, which began on February 28, continues to cause regional instability and disruptions to energy supplies.

Key Points: US-Iran Peace Plan via Pakistan; Iran Sets Conditions

  • US peace framework shared via Pakistan
  • Iran rejects proposal as one-sided
  • Tehran outlines five conditions for ceasefire
  • Conflict began Feb 28, disrupting energy
  • Diplomacy continues amid battlefield stalemate
4 min read

Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff confirms Pakistan acting as intermediary between US, Iran

US envoy confirms Pakistan mediated a 15-point peace plan to Iran, which rejects it as excessive and outlines its own terms for ending the conflict.

"if a deal happens, it will be great for the country of Iran, for the entire region and the world at large - Steve Witkoff"

Washington, DC, March 26

United States Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff said on Thursday that 15-point action list that forms the framework for a peace deal given to Iran has been circulated through the Pakistani government and if a deal happens, "it will be great for the country of Iran, for the entire region and the world at large".

He made the remarks during a White House Cabinet meeting on Thursday in the presence of US President Donald Trump.

"We have, along with your foreign policy team, presented a 15-point action list that forms the framework for a peace deal. This has been circulated through the Pakistani government, acting as the mediator and this has resulted in strong and positive messaging and talks, as you just indicated to the press," Witkoff said.

"But these are sensitive diplomatic discussions, and you have directed us to maintain confidentiality on the specific terms and not negotiate through the news media, as others do. We will see where things lead, and if we can convince Iran that this is the inflection point with no good alternatives for them, other than more death and destruction," he added.

Iran has responded negatively to the American proposal aimed at ending the ongoing conflict insisting that any cessation of hostilities will only occur on Tehran's "own terms and timeline," a senior political-security official told state broadcaster Press TV on Wednesday. It has termed the proposal one-sided and excessive.

Witkoff lauded Trump and said the policy of "peace through strength" is the most effective tool for a diplomatic resolution.

"We have strong signs that this is a possibility and if a deal happens, it will be great for the country of Iran, for the entire region and the world at large. Your policy of peace through strength is the most effective tool for a diplomatic resolution here, just as this policy was an effective tool in each and every one of all of the other conflicts you settled in your first year," he said.

He said Iran is looking for an off-ramp "following your powerful threat on Saturday".

"Your indications that you are willing to listen to peace proposals have been well received instructed us that your preference is always peace and that we should make that our priority. We have delivered that message, along with the 15 points for peace. Finally, we have told Iran one last thing. Don't miscalculate again," he said.

Iran said earlier that it will end the war when it decides to do so and when its own conditions are met," the official told Press TV, emphasising Tehran's resolve to continue its defence and inflict "heavy blows" on the enemy until its demands are fulfilled.

According to the official, Washington has been pursuing negotiations through various diplomatic channels, putting forward proposals that Tehran views as "excessive" and disconnected from the reality of America's failure on the battlefield.

Tehran has categorized the latest overture, which was delivered via a friendly regional intermediary, as a ploy to heighten tensions.

The official outlined five specific conditions under which Iran would agree to end the war. These include "a complete halt to "aggression and assassinations by the enemy"; the establishment of concrete mechanisms to ensure that the war is not reimposed on the Islamic Republic; guaranteed and clearly defined payment of war damages and reparations; the conclusion of the war across all fronts and for all resistance groups involved throughout the region and international recognition and guarantees regarding Iran's sovereign right to exercise authority over the Strait of Hormuz.

The official also told Press TV that these stipulations are in addition to demands previously presented by Tehran during the second round of negotiations in Geneva, which took place just days before the US and Israel carried out strikes on February 28.

"No negotiations will be held prior to that," the official stressed, reiterating that the continuation of Iran's defensive operations will persist until the outlined conditions are met.

"The end of the war will occur when Iran decides it should end, not when Trump envisions its conclusion," the official further told Press TV.

The conflict between Israel and the United States on one side and Iran on the other started on February 28 and has caused disruptions in energy supply.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The "peace through strength" policy sounds like a euphemism for coercion. Iran's five conditions seem like a non-starter for the US. This feels like diplomatic posturing more than a genuine path to de-escalation. The mention of the Strait of Hormuz is critical for global trade, and India's energy imports. Hope cooler heads prevail.
P
Priya S
As an Indian, my primary concern is the impact on our economy and diaspora. Any conflict in the Gulf affects oil prices and remittances. If Pakistan's role brings genuine peace, good. But the history of US-Pak relations is complex. Let's hope this mediation is transparent and doesn't create new geopolitical headaches for our region. 🙏
R
Rohit P
"Don't miscalculate again" – such language is not diplomacy, it's threat. No sovereign nation will negotiate under such public ultimatums. Iran's conditions, especially on the Strait of Hormuz, show they are digging in. This could get worse before it gets better. India should diplomatically engage with all sides to protect its interests.
V
Vikram M
The article mentions disruptions in energy supply. That's the real worry for us. Petrol prices are already high. Our government should have a contingency plan. On the mediation, Pakistan has ties with both US and Iran, so maybe it can deliver. But the trust deficit is huge. Let's see.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, I think the US approach is flawed. Presenting a 15-point list via an intermediary while also issuing threats is contradictory. Iran will never accept a deal that looks like

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50