Trump Slams Allies Over Hormuz Support, Singles Out UK's Starmer

US President Donald Trump has publicly expressed disappointment that several allies have been reluctant to support US efforts to secure the Strait of Hormuz. He specifically called out nations like China, Japan, and South Korea, which heavily rely on the waterway for energy, to contribute. Trump recounted a hesitant conversation with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer about providing naval ships and minesweepers. The president used the moment to revive long-standing criticisms about burden-sharing within alliances like NATO.

Key Points: Trump Criticizes Allies for Lack of Hormuz Strait Support

  • Trump criticizes allies for reluctance on Hormuz support
  • Names China, Japan, South Korea as major beneficiaries
  • Singles out UK PM Starmer for hesitant response
  • Revives concerns about NATO burden-sharing
3 min read

Trump slams allies over Hormuz support

President Trump expresses disappointment in allies like the UK and calls on China, Japan, and South Korea to help secure the Strait of Hormuz.

"They should not only be thanking us, but they should be helping us. - Donald Trump"

Washington, March 17

US President Donald Trump said countries dependent on energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz should be helping the United States, expressing disappointment that several allies were reluctant to step in.

"They should not only be thanking us, but they should be helping us," Trump said, pointing to nations that rely heavily on oil and energy shipments through the strategic waterway.

He named major economies, including China, Japan, and South Korea, as beneficiaries of secure passage through the Hormuz Strait. "China, as an example, should be thanking us," he said. "Japan gets 95 percent, China 91 percent. Many of the countries, South Korea gets a tremendous percentage of their oil and their -- therefore, their energy from the straits."

Trump said it was "a lot easier to get people today than it was two weeks ago", suggesting that some countries became more willing to engage only after the United States had already taken decisive military action.

"There are some countries that greatly disappointed me," he said. "One or two have been great. I'll tell you who the great ones are at the right time."

The president singled out Britain in particular, recounting a conversation with Prime Minister Keir Starmer in which he had asked for naval support. "It would be really helpful if you'd send over a couple of ships, and if you have some minesweepers, which they do, that would be very helpful," Trump said.

He described the response as hesitant. "The Prime Minister, he's a nice man, I think he's a very nice guy, he says, well, I'd like to ask my team," Trump said. "I said, you don't have to worry about a team. You don't have a team. You're the prime minister, you can make a decision."

Trump said the latter offer of support came too late. "I don't want them anymore. I don't want them after we win, I want them before we start. I don't need your aircraft carriers after we've already won."

He used the moment to revive a long-standing concern about burden-sharing within alliances. "I always said, you know, the problem with NATO is we'll always be there for them, but they'll never be there for us," he said.

Trump argued that the United States had carried the main burden while others hesitated. "We defend all these countries, and then, do you have any minesweepers? And they say, well, would it be possible for us not to get involved?"

At the same time, he acknowledged that some countries had been willing to support the US position. "There have been some that were right up there," Trump said. "They wanted to do it so much."

Trump also raised concerns about shipping risks in the region, even as he said there was no confirmed deployment of mines. "We don't know that any mines have even been dropped," he said, but added that "the thought that they would scares people that have billion dollar ships".

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
It's interesting he names China, Japan, South Korea... but what about India? A huge portion of our oil comes through Hormuz. This shows how some global powers still have a very selective view of who 'matters'. We need to strengthen our own naval capabilities for such contingencies. 🇮🇳
R
Rohit P
Trump has a point about burden-sharing. Why should one country bear all the cost? But the way he communicates is so transactional and rude. You can't treat allies like employees you can fire. Starmer was right to consult his team—that's how responsible governance works, not impulsive decisions.
A
Ananya R
The instability in the Strait is a worry for every Indian consumer. Petrol prices will shoot up if there's trouble. Hope our government is engaging with all sides quietly to ensure safe passage. We don't need another foreign policy crisis right now.
D
David E
Watching from the UK, it's fascinating. He publicly shames an ally for due process. India often talks about 'strategic autonomy'—maybe European nations are exercising theirs by not jumping when called. The world isn't a monolith that answers to one power anymore.
S
Siddharth J
This is why we are increasing ties with Russia and the Middle East directly. Can't put all our eggs in one basket. The US is an important partner, but their domestic politics shouldn't dictate global energy security. Time for India to play a more active role in the Indian Ocean region.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50