Iran Rejects Ceasefire Claims, Vows to Continue Military Action Against US

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi has firmly rejected U.S. President Donald Trump's claims that Iran is seeking a ceasefire or negotiations. Araghchi stated Iran will continue its military actions until the United States ends what it calls an "illegal war." He defended Iran's strikes, asserting they target only U.S. military assets in the Gulf region. This comes a day after Trump stated he was unwilling to make a deal with Iran, claiming the current terms are insufficient.

Key Points: Iran Denies Seeking Truce, Vows Defense Against US

  • Iran denies seeking ceasefire
  • Vows continued military action
  • Rules out talks with Washington
  • Defends strikes on US assets
3 min read

"We have neither sought truce nor talks": Iran rejects seeking ceasefire

Iranian FM rejects Trump's ceasefire claims, says Iran will continue military ops until US ends "illegal war." No talks planned.

"We never asked for a cease-fire, and we have never asked even for negotiation. - Seyed Abbas Araghchi"

Tehran, March 16

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi on Sunday rejected the claims made by US President Donald Trump that it was seeking a ceasefire, saying that Iran was ready to defend itself as long as it takes. He also spoke in defence of the strikes carried out on United States military assets in Gulf countries, CBS News reported.

Araghchi said that Tehran will continue military action until the US ends the "illegal war".

In an interview with CBS News, the Iranian leader dismissed the claims that Iran had sought negotiations or a truce.

"No, we never asked for a cease-fire, and we have never asked even for negotiation. We are ready to defend ourselves as long as it takes," Araghchi said.

He added that Iran would continue military operations until the United States changes course.

"We continue to do that until President Trump comes to the point that this is an illegal war with no victory," he said, as reported by CBS News.

The remarks come a day after Trump said the United States was not ready to make a deal with Iran because "the terms aren't good enough yet".

Araghchi also ruled out talks with Washington, saying Iran sees no reason to return to negotiations after being attacked.

"We don't see any reason why we should talk with Americans, because we were talking with them when they decided to attack us," he said.

The Iranian minister defended Tehran's attacks across the Gulf region, insisting that Iranian forces were targeting only US military assets.

"We are only targeting American assets, American installations, American military bases," Araghchi said.

He added that Gulf countries hosting US forces had effectively allowed their territory to be used to launch attacks against Iran. "These are the countries who have given their soil to American forces to attack us," he said, as reported by CBS News.

Earlier, Trump on Saturday (local time) said that Iran was ready to negotiate a deal to end the ongoing war, but he was not prepared to agree to a ceasfire yet since the terms offered are insufficient, according to NBC News.

In an interview with NBC News, Trump said he was unwilling to make a deal with Tehran at this stage despite indications the country wants negotiations.

"Iran wants to make a deal, and I don't want to make it because the terms aren't good enough yet," he said, adding that any terms would have to be "very solid".

When asked about the conditions for a deal, Trump said, "I don't want to say that to you," though he indicated that a commitment from Iran to completely abandon would be part of any agreement.

His remarks came amid the ongoing conflict that began two weeks ago when the US and Israeli forces launched joint strikes on Iran, triggering retaliatory attacks by Tehran on Israel and US-linked targets across the region.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
It's interesting to see the posturing. Trump says they want a deal, Iran says they don't. Who to believe? The US has a history of pulling out of agreements (like the JCPOA), so Iran's distrust is understandable. But this "no talks" stance from Tehran seems more for domestic consumption. Behind the scenes, channels must be open.
P
Priyanka N
As an Indian, my primary concern is for the thousands of our citizens working in the Gulf countries. If US bases there are targeted, our people could be caught in the crossfire. The government should have contingency plans ready. Our foreign policy needs to walk a very careful line here.
A
Aman W
The Iranian minister has a point. If you are talking to someone and they attack you mid-conversation, why would you trust them again? The US initiated this conflict. However, saying they will continue military action "as long as it takes" is worrying. This could drag on for years, devastating the region.
K
Karthik V
Both sides are too proud to back down. Trump wants a "very solid" deal (meaning complete surrender), and Iran won't even come to the table. Where does this leave everyone else? India should use its good relations with both to advocate for de-escalation. We have more to lose than most if this spirals.
M
Michael C
With respect, I think the Iranian position, while defiant, is strategically unwise. They are economically strained and facing internal protests. A prolonged conflict with the US, even a limited one, will cripple them further. Sometimes national pride must be balanced with pragmatism

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50