Trump Rejects Putin's Nuclear Proposal, Demands New Treaty After New START Ends

US President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal from Russian President Vladimir Putin to voluntarily continue observing the limits of the expired New START treaty. Trump criticized the pact as a "badly negotiated deal" and called for experts to craft a new, modernized nuclear treaty. The expiration leaves no legally binding constraints on the world's two largest nuclear arsenals for the first time in over fifty years. The treaty had been the last surviving arms control agreement between the two powers, following Russia's suspension of participation in 2023.

Key Points: Trump Rejects Putin's Offer, Seeks New Nuclear Treaty

  • New START treaty expires
  • Trump rejects Putin's voluntary extension
  • Calls for new modernized arms pact
  • No binding nuclear limits for first time in decades
3 min read

Trump rejects Putin's proposal to continue nuclear limits after New START expiry, calls for new modernised treaty

US President Donald Trump rejects a Russian proposal to extend nuclear limits after New START expires, calling for a new, modernized arms treaty.

Trump rejects Putin's proposal to continue nuclear limits after New START expiry, calls for new modernised treaty
"Rather than extend 'NEW START'... we should have our Nuclear Experts work on a new, improved, and modernised Treaty - Donald Trump"

Washington, DC, February 6

US President Donald Trump has rejected a proposal from Russian President Vladimir Putin to voluntarily continue observing limits on strategic nuclear weapons following the expiration of the landmark new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

The development came as Thursday marked the end of the pact, which had imposed the final remaining restrictions on the nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia, the two nations possessing the world's largest stockpiles, leaving, for the first time in over five decades, no legally binding constraints in place.

Responding on his social media platform, Trump criticised the agreement, calling it "a badly negotiated deal by the United States" that was "being grossly violated." He said, "Rather than extend 'NEW START' -- a badly negotiated deal by the United States that, aside from everything else, is being grossly violated -- we should have our Nuclear Experts work on a new, improved, and modernised Treaty that can last long into the future."

Framing his decision within a broader push to strengthen American military power, Trump highlighted what he described as sweeping defence upgrades during his presidency. "The United States is the most powerful country in the world," he asserted, adding, "I completely rebuilt its military in my first term, including new and many refurbished nuclear weapons." He also credited the establishment of the Space Force and pointed to what he called unprecedented expansion across military branches.

Continuing that theme, Trump referenced enhancements in naval forces, claiming the addition of battleships "100 times more powerful than the ones that roamed the seas during World War II," specifically citing vessels such as the Iowa and the Missouri.

He went on to claim personal credit for preventing global nuclear confrontations, stating without elaboration, "I have stopped nuclear wars from breaking out across the world between Pakistan and India, Iran and Israel, and Russia and Ukraine."

The New START agreement, concluded in 2010 between then US President Barack Obama and Russia's then leader Dmitry Medvedev, had placed ceilings on deployed strategic nuclear warheads and their delivery systems maintained by Washington and Moscow. With the treaty now expired, those limits are no longer enforceable, prompting arms control advocates to warn of the risk of a fresh nuclear arms buildup.

The erosion of the pact had begun earlier, when in February 2023 Putin announced Russia's suspension of participation, saying Moscow "couldn't allow US inspections of its nuclear sites at a time when Washington and its NATO allies have openly declared Moscow's defeat in Ukraine as their goal."

New START had stood as the final surviving agreement in a decades-long chain of arms control deals between Russia and the United States, a process that began with SALT I in 1972, aimed at restraining the nuclear stockpiles of the two powers.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The part where he claims he stopped a nuclear war between India and Pakistan is... quite something. Our governments have their own channels and mechanisms. It feels reductive and arrogant for any foreign leader to take sole credit for peace in our region. 🙄
A
Arjun K
While a modernised treaty might be needed, letting the old one lapse with nothing in place is reckless. The world can't afford a nuclear free-for-all. India has always advocated for global nuclear disarmament. This move by the US sets a terrible precedent.
S
Sarah B
Watching from India, the breakdown of US-Russia agreements makes the whole world less safe. It increases uncertainty for everyone. We need diplomacy, not posturing. Hope they get back to the table soon.
V
Vikram M
The timing is bad. With active conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, the last thing we need is a new nuclear arms race. Both sides need to show responsibility. India must continue its independent and principled stance on global security.
K
Karthik V
Respectfully, I disagree with the outright rejection. A stopgap extension while negotiating a new treaty would have been the sensible, mature approach. This "all or nothing" strategy puts global security at risk. Let's hope experts on both sides can work something out fast.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50