Trump Seeks to Elevate 'Board of Peace' Above UN, Expand Its Global Mandate

US President Donald Trump has stated his intention to expand the mandate of his 'Board of Peace' beyond Gaza and position it as an organization that would oversee the United Nations. The UN responded by reaffirming that its work is overseen by member states through the General Assembly and Security Council, as per its Charter. Trump criticized the UN for not living up to its potential, partly due to the Security Council veto power, while also offering conditional financial help despite the US owing billions in dues. The president also recounted a malfunctioning escalator incident during a past UN visit involving First Lady Melania Trump.

Key Points: Trump's Board of Peace Aims to Oversee UN, Expand Beyond Gaza

  • Trump aims to position BoP above UN
  • UN cites Charter, oversight by member states
  • Trump criticizes UN, offers conditional help
  • US owes UN billions in unpaid dues
  • Trump recounts escalator incident at UN HQ
4 min read

Trump pushes to expand 'Board of Peace' beyond Gaza, position it above UN

US President Donald Trump proposes positioning his Board of Peace as a supervisory body over the UN, with plans to widen its scope globally.

"The Board of Peace is going to almost be looking over the United Nations - Donald Trump"

United Nations, Feb 20

US President Donald Trump is trying to position his Board of Peace as a super international organisation that would supervise the UN while widening its own scope beyond Gaza for which it was set up.

"The Board of Peace is going to almost be looking over the United Nations and making sure it runs properly", he said on Thursday at the first meeting of the group.

Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, sidestepped Trump's assertion and cited the UN Charter.

"What is clear, if you look at the Charter of the UN, which remains our guiding principle, the work of the UN is overseen by Member States through the General Assembly and the Security Council", he said when a reporter asked him at his briefing about Trump's statement.

Trump did acknowledge the endorsement given by the Security Council for the BoP to ensure a ceasefire in Gaza and rebuild it, a limited mandate.

He said of his ambitions for the BoP, "I think we can spread out to other things as we succeed with Gaza".

After Gaza, he said, "We can do numerous other things."

"We can do pretty much whatever we want to do. And we'll do it in conjunction with the United Nations", he added.

He repeated his criticism of the UN that "it has not lived up to (its) potential".

The fundamental reason for the UN's failure to end conflicts is the veto power of the five permanent members, including the US, that limits the Security Council's powers to act.

Trump, on the other hand, unilaterally used the economic, political, and military might of the US to back his diplomacy.

But the president said that the UN has "tremendous potential", and "some very good people at the United Nations" and offered help to strengthen it.

The UN is struggling financially because the US has not paid its dues and owes about $4 billion, and officials have warned it could go broke mid-year if Washington doesn't pay up.

Trump said, "They need help, and they need help money-wise. We're going to help them money-wise, and we're going to make sure the United Nations is viable".

But he did not give an assurance that he would release the UN dues, even though most of it has been approved by Congress.

"We're going to strengthen up the United Nations", he added.

As is his wont, Trump projected his offers to help the UN through the lens of his legacy.

"Someday, I won't be here. The United Nations will be. I think, (it) is going to be much stronger", he said.

"I think it's going to eventually live up to potential", he added. "That'll be a big day".

Trump said that he was going to speak to Guterres "in a little while".

Dujarric said, "We're expecting a call", but as of Thursday night (local time), there was no sign of a Trump conversation with Guterres, who is in India for the AI impact summit.

Trump called Guterres a "good man" with whom he "had a good relationship".

But he quickly resurrected his complaint about the malfunctioning escalator and the teleprompter when he visited the UN headquarters in September to speak to the General Assembly.

"They did turn off my teleprompter", and "I had an escalator that stopped", he said.

"Lucky my movie star First Lady was in front of me because I put my hand on a certain part of her body" to steady her when the escalator stopped, "just boom".

Amazon recently released a documentary on Melania Trump, elevating her to a "movie star" for Trump.

Before his complaint about the teleprompter and the escalator, Trump had said, "We're going to make sure its facilities are good".

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The irony is too much! The US owes the UN billions and then talks about "helping them money-wise" to make it "viable". First, pay your dues, then talk about oversight. This feels like a corporate takeover bid for global governance. Not a good precedent.
R
Rohit P
While the UN definitely needs reform, especially the veto power issue, this approach seems chaotic. From complaining about escalators to grand visions of a new world order in one speech? It lacks seriousness. Global institutions need stability, not this rollercoaster.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, I have to respectfully disagree with the direction here. The principle of sovereign equality of nations is vital. A "super" organization answerable primarily to one country undermines the very idea of international cooperation. The focus should be on making the existing system more effective and inclusive.
K
Karthik V
"We can do pretty much whatever we want to do." That statement says it all. This isn't about peace; it's about power. India must be very cautious and ensure its strategic autonomy is not compromised by such new formations. Our foreign policy should remain nimble and principled.
M
Michael C
The Secretary-General is in India for the AI summit while this is happening. Interesting timing. Maybe some of the discussions there about global governance of technology are more relevant and forward-looking than this proposed board.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50