Trump Weighs Major Military Escalation Against Iran Post-Protests

President Trump has been briefed on significantly escalated military options against Iran, designed to damage its nuclear infrastructure or undermine its supreme leader. The planning shift follows the forceful suppression of recent mass protests within Iran. US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth underscored the threat, warning Iran against pursuing nuclear weapons and highlighting US military readiness. Trump himself urged Iran to negotiate, warning time is running out and alluding to past strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Key Points: Trump Mulls Expanded Military Options for Iran

  • New plans target nuclear sites & leadership
  • Options exceed prior proposals
  • Includes potential raids on Iranian soil
  • Follows suppression of mass protests
3 min read

Trump mulling expanded military options against Iran amid post-protest crackdown

US President briefed on aggressive new military plans targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure and leadership after protest crackdown.

"they should not pursue nuclear capabilities, and we will be prepared to deliver whatever this president expects of the War Department. - Pete Hegseth"

Washington DC, January 30

US President Trump has recently been briefed on a broader and more aggressive range of possible military actions targeting Iran, reported The New York Times.

The proposals are designed to inflict deeper damage on Iran's nuclear and missile infrastructure or to undermine the authority of the country's supreme leader, reflecting a significant escalation in planning compared with options reviewed earlier this month.

Officials said the measures now under consideration exceed those examined roughly two weeks ago, when the administration was focused on fulfilling Trump's public commitment to halt the killing of protesters by Iranian government security forces and affiliated militias. Those officials spoke "on the condition of anonymity to discuss potential military plans," citing the sensitivity of internal deliberations, reported The New York Times.

The updated menu of options includes scenarios that would place American forces directly on Iranian soil, such as targeted raids against key facilities. The context surrounding these discussions has shifted, officials noted, as the mass protests that swept parts of Iran have been forcefully suppressed, at least for now, by the authorities in Tehran.

Earlier, US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth delivered a stark warning to Iran on Thursday (local time) and underscored President Donald Trump's forceful military stance during a Cabinet meeting, as the United States continues to surge warships and air assets across the Middle East in a growing show of force amid rising tensions over Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

In outlining the seriousness of the threat posed by Iran, Hegseth cautioned Tehran against pursuing nuclear weapons, asserting that "they should not pursue nuclear capabilities, and we will be prepared to deliver whatever this president expects of the War Department."

His comments were part of broader remarks highlighting US military readiness and deterrence in the region. To illustrate American military capability, the defence chief pointed to the recent capture of former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife, describing the operation as unparalleled in scale and execution.

"No other military in the world could have executed the most sophisticated, powerful raid -- not just in American history -- I would say in world history," Hegseth said.

He added that this feat demonstrated the unique empowerment given to US forces under the current administration: "No other president would have been willing to empower those warriors that way."Hegseth said such high-profile operations are intended to send a clear message about the US resolve globally.

This followe a post on social media platform Truth Social, where President Trump said a large U.S. naval force, described as a "massive armada" led by the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, was moving toward Iran. He expressed urgency on Iran returning to the negotiating table and urged Tehran to reach an agreement that would bar nuclear weapons development.

"Hopefully Iran will quickly 'Come to the Table' and negotiate a fair and equitable deal - NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS," Trump wrote, warning that "time is running out" and that if Iran does not comply, the next attack "will be far worse" than prior strikes.

Trump's comments invoked past US military action, including a June 2025 campaign when American forces struck multiple Iranian nuclear facilities in coordination with Israel, an operation that Washington said significantly set back Tehran's nuclear capabilities.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The US seems to be repeating the same playbook. Military action rarely solves long-term political problems. The focus should be on supporting the Iranian people's aspirations, not just bombing infrastructure. This could backfire badly.
P
Priyanka N
As an Indian, my first worry is for our diaspora in the Gulf and for oil prices. If there's a war, petrol will cross ₹150/litre for sure. Our government must have a contingency plan. The US should think about the global economic impact, not just its own politics.
A
Aman W
The bragging about the "most sophisticated raid in world history" is a bit much, no? It feels like chest-thumping to justify further aggression. A true superpower leads through restraint and smart diplomacy, not just showing off military muscle.
K
Karthik V
Complex situation. On one hand, a nuclear Iran is a threat to regional peace. On the other, US intervention has a terrible track record in West Asia. India must walk a tightrope - protect our Chabahar port interests and relations with Iran, while managing our partnership with America. Tough job for MEA.
M
Michael C
The article mentions the protests being suppressed. If the US genuinely cared about the Iranian people, they'd find ways to support civil society, not just plan bombings that will likely unite the population against an external enemy. The approach seems counterproductive.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50