Trump Hints at Iran 'Regime Change', Says War Could End Swiftly

US President Donald Trump stated the conflict with Iran could end very quickly under certain conditions, while negotiations are ongoing. He described significant political shifts within Iran, terming them a "regime change" and claiming the US is now dealing with more reasonable and less radicalized counterparts. Trump emphasized that military pressure remains a key part of the US strategy, though he acknowledged domestic sentiment favors ending the conflict. The remarks underscore a dual-track approach of pressure and diplomacy as Washington seeks to shape outcomes in a region of global strategic importance.

Key Points: Trump on Iran: War Could End Quickly, Hints at Regime Change

  • Trump says war could end quickly
  • Describes internal Iranian shifts as "regime change"
  • Claims negotiating with more reasonable interlocutors
  • Military pressure remains central to US strategy
3 min read

Trump hints at 'regime change' in Iran, says war could end soon

US President Donald Trump suggests Iran war could end soon, describes internal shifts as "regime change" and points to new negotiations.

"You can call it what you want, but I call it regime change. - Donald Trump"

Washington, April 6

US President Donald Trump on Monday said the war with Iran could end swiftly under certain conditions, while claiming that US actions have already led to major political shifts inside the country.

"Well, it could end very quickly, the war, if they do what they have to do," Trump told reporters at the White House, indicating that negotiations are ongoing.

He said the US is currently dealing with a different set of Iranian interlocutors. "The people that we're negotiating with now... are much more reasonable," Trump said, suggesting a shift in Tehran's leadership approach.

Trump went further, describing the changes in Iran as significant. "You can call it what you want, but I call it regime change," he said, adding that earlier leadership phases had been removed.

He said the current negotiating group is "not as radicalised" and "much smarter", and expressed confidence that talks are being conducted "in good faith".

At the same time, Trump made clear that military pressure remains central to US strategy. He said Iran's ability to sustain the conflict is limited, noting that its remaining capabilities include "some missiles" and "some drones".

He also pointed to a recent incident in which a US aircraft was shot down but both pilots survived, calling it a rare occurrence in such operations. "They got a little bit lucky... in war, you need a little bit of luck also," Trump said.

Trump said the US has multiple pathways ahead, including the option of disengagement. "We could leave right now... but I want to finish it up," he said, indicating a preference to see the conflict through to a defined outcome.

He also introduced an economic dimension to the conflict, suggesting that control over Iran's oil resources could be a consideration. "If I had my choice... take the oil... keep the oil and would make plenty of money," Trump said, while acknowledging that such a move may not align with domestic sentiment.

At the same time, he argued that public opinion in the US favours ending the conflict. "The American people would like to see us come home," Trump said, even as he maintained that the war serves a larger strategic purpose.

The remarks highlight a dual-track US approach -- continued military pressure alongside negotiations - as Washington seeks to shape outcomes in Iran.

The evolving situation in West Asia remains closely watched globally, particularly by countries like India with deep economic, energy, and diaspora links to the region.

The Iran issue has long been a focal point of global diplomacy, especially after the US withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal, with its ripple effects continuing to influence regional stability and international energy markets.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Trump openly talking about "taking the oil" is shocking. It's 2024, not the colonial era. This kind of rhetoric only fuels anti-Western sentiment. The US should focus on diplomacy, not resource grabs.
P
Priya S
As an Indian, my main worry is for the diaspora and the impact on oil prices. Petrol is already so expensive! 🇮🇳 Any war will make it worse for the common person. Global powers need to think of the economic fallout for developing nations.
R
Rohit P
While I'm no fan of the Iranian regime's policies, externally imposed "regime change" never works. Look at Iraq, Libya. It creates a power vacuum and decades of chaos. India must maintain its strategic autonomy and not get pulled into this.
K
Karthik V
The article mentions India's deep links to the region. Absolutely true. We have millions of citizens working in the Gulf. A full-blown conflict would be a humanitarian and repatriation nightmare. Hope cooler heads prevail.
N
Nikhil C
Trump says the American people want to come home, but he "wants to finish it up." Sounds contradictory. This conflict feels like it's more about legacy and politics than any real strategic goal for regional peace.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50