Parliament Chiefs Reject Opposition Bid to Impeach Election Commissioner

The Chairmen of both Houses of Parliament have rejected notices for an impeachment motion against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The notices, signed by a total of 193 opposition MPs, were filed in March under specific constitutional and legal provisions. Official bulletins stated the Speakers refused to admit the motions after careful assessment of all relevant aspects. The decision has drawn criticism from opposition leaders, who referenced the resignation of the previous Rajya Sabha Chairman.

Key Points: Opposition Motion to Remove CEC Gyanesh Kumar Rejected

  • Impeachment motion rejected
  • Notices signed by 193 MPs
  • Filed under constitutional provisions
  • Opposition criticizes decision
2 min read

Rajya Sabha Chairman, Lok Sabha Speaker reject opposition notices seeking removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar

Rajya Sabha Chairman and Lok Sabha Speaker reject impeachment notices against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar filed by opposition MPs.

"After due consideration... the Speaker... has refused to admit the said notice of motion. - Lok Sabha Bulletin"

New Delhi, April 6

Rajya Sabha Chairman CP Radhakrishnan and Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla have rejected the impeachment motion notice submitted by opposition members seeking the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

The notice of motion for impeachment of Gyanesh Kumar was signed by 130 Lok Sabha members and 63 members of the Rajya Sabha.

The notice of motion in Lok Sabha - filed on March 12, 2026, under Article 324(5) of the Constitution of India, read with Article 124(4), Section 11(2) of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, and the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 - sought the removal of Gyanesh Kumar. It was submitted to the Lok Sabha Speaker.

A similar notice was submitted to the Rajya Sabha Chairman and Vice President Radhakrishnan on March 12.

A Lok Sabha bulletin said that the Speaker has refused to admit the motion after due consideration."After due consideration of the notice of Motion and a careful and objective assessment of all relevant aspects and issues involved therein, the Speaker Lok Sabha, in exercise of the powers vested to him under Section 3 of the Judges (Injury) Act, 1968, has refused to admit the said notice of motion," it said.

A Rajya Sabha bulletin also informed members of the rejection of the notice.

"After due consideration of the notice of Motion and a careful and objective assessment of all relevant aspects and issues involved, the Chairman, Rajya Sabha, in exercise of the powers vested to him under section 3 of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, has refused to admit the said notice of Motion," it said.

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh took a dig at the BJP-led government over the rejection of opposition motion in the two Houses of Parliament.

"We know what happened to the last Chairman of the Rajya Sabha who accepted a petition moved by Opposition MPs," he said in a post on X, attaching the Lok Sabha bulletin.

Jagdeep Dhankhar had resigned as Rajya Sabha Chairman in July last year citing health grounds.

Opposition parties have been taking potshots at the government over Dhankhar's resignation.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Very disappointing. When 130+ MPs sign a motion, it deserves a proper debate in the House, not a quiet rejection. This sets a dangerous precedent. The opposition's concerns about electoral integrity should be heard, not silenced.
R
Rohit P
Jairam Ramesh's comment about the last Chairman is in poor taste. Using someone's health resignation for political point-scoring is shameful. Let's focus on issues, not personal digs.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, the technical grounds for rejection seem solid—they cited the specific Acts. But the perception of partisanship is hard to avoid. The Election Commission's credibility is paramount for a healthy democracy.
V
Vikram M
Good decision. The opposition is just creating noise before elections. If they have real evidence of misconduct, they should present it to the courts, not waste Parliament's time with political theatrics.
K
Kavya N
This whole episode shows how broken our political discourse is. Instead of working together on real issues like inflation, we're stuck in these endless political battles. So frustrating! 🤦‍♀️

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50